This is extrapolation using mostly conjecture, making a concrete statement about a variable doesn't prove anything it just sounds authoritative, if you have an open mind then you are open to the variables, but it is obvious that we are preceeding from multiple directions, so try not to make confident assertions about variables and I will too.
Uranium and polonium radiohalos thus provide startling evidence of catastrophic geological processes on a young earth. During the year-long Flood (about 4,500 years ago) sediments were eroded and deposited catastrophically on a global scale. The catastrophe buried vast graveyards of plants and animals, producing fossil-bearing rock layers all over the earth. Rapid earth movements pushed up mountains,9 and formed granite bodies quickly. Inside these granites, super-fast radioactive decay generated uranium and polonium radiohalos. These are so microscopic they could be easily overlooked.4 But their presence in abundance in granites all around the world cannot be ignored.10 They are exciting confirmation that the earth and its rocks are not millions and billions of years old as usually claimed, but only about 6,000 years, as God’s Word plainly declares in the historical narratives in Genesis.
Just because the evidence is not readily available does not mean that it automatically constitutes an eternal conundrum, it simply means that the answer has not been discovered yet, or the technology has not advanced enough to discover the truth of the matter, For my part I believe in the Biblical Creation account recorded by Moses who recorded the events by speaking directly to God, there are answers to all the questions, and we will discover them all eventually, we need to be patient, and ask God to show us the answers to these questions because He was the One that accomplished these things, the world is 6000 years old, if the halos formed then there must be a reason why they formed quickly, and we must remember that the One who designed physics is not bound by it. This matrix can be altered or manipulated at will by Him, so to state physical norms emphatically is presumptuous when referring to God.
all I'm saying is the world goes far beyond the natural, and is extremely complex to the point that I am not going to make assertions about things that we don't have all the information on, I will trust in the testimony of those that I trust, and proceed from a sure base line, departing from a sure base line from a trusted source and looking only at the physical is not only misleading, it is fatal in regards to finding the truth. I am doing a lot of reading on line and I will not make snap decisions about anything or regard anything as fact just because it happens to be in a Org textbook.
What I'm saying is we don't have all the physical evidence necessary to make an exact formulation, we weren't there, you weren't there, you have not performed these experiments yourself so you yourself are trusting in the opinions of others, we were not there to witness the entire planetary reconstruction of the earth so you are trusting in what you hear and see, and I am doing the same, we just come from different points of view and all of us do not have all the information, all I'm saying is looks can be deceiving and people have agendas, so be very careful who you believe, because some day people are going to be entering heaven while others are left behind because they were too busy fiddling with their conundrums. He says my righteous ones will walk by faith not by sight.
Organizations have agendas which drive doctrine, that why we refer to them as Orgs, because they create agenda that causes them to stray.
You're not 'trusting in the opinions of others' by accepting experimental data. The point is, they show their work. You can look at their data yourself, and you can read about their methodology. Nobody serious would accept their conclusions otherwise.
That's one of Ken Ham's favorite statements, "you weren't there". Are you suggesting that there is no physical evidence for looking into the physical past of the earth?
you are trusting in conclusions that are based on assumptions, because nobody can wait millions of years for something to happen, so you are basing YOUR belief on assumptions that are formulated by people that do not have all the information necessary to state the truth of the matter exactly, and you chose to believe it. well that is your choice, I have no problem with that, but I'm just saying my trusted source is better than yours because it comes directly from the mouth of the One that created and recreated the whole thing.
yes there is evidence, but the conclusion always depends on which dim glass your looking through.
