• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Morat

Untitled One
Jun 6, 2002
2,725
4
49
Visit site
✟20,190.00
Faith
Atheist

   Oh, true. And the fact that you misrepresented Hawking's words badly in your initial post, and responded to the evidence of that by calling Hawking's explanation "smoke and mirrors" had nothing to do with it (when, of course, the mere existance of the explanation showed you lied, so you call it "speculation". What's the definition of "is", Souljah?).

   Yes. It's our emotional investment with Hawking. It has nothing to do with you lying, with your deceptions, and your general attitude that truth is for other people.

 
 
Upvote 0

Explaining how zero energy works is NOT explaining where energy came from in the first place.

He clearly said that the answer to the question of where did the energy come from, is that the total energy is actually zero.

He NEVER explains where energy comes from, other than saying the total energy is zero. Wow, that is brilliant.
 
Upvote 0
Originally posted by D. Scarlatti


Can you libel yourself?

Better yet, can you sue yourself?

Can you have an original thought?  Can you post something of your own, instead of acting like some post vulture?

All you ever do is make snide remarks in passing and contribute nothing to these forums other than bitter sarcasm.
 
Upvote 0

D. Scarlatti

Well-Known Member
Jun 3, 2002
1,581
88
Earth
✟2,620.00
Faith
Atheist

That's rich. I think I was the guy with the copy of ABHoT handy, as opposed to the person that was relying on "memory."

And what is it you do? Misunderstand, and worse, misrepresent the contents of a book you admit you've only read parts of; claim that Hawking's statements in the referenced chapter are the same as saying "There isn't any energy" even though he is talking about massive amounts of energy; confuse "vacuum" with "vacuum state" and "quantum vacuum"; provide sources that contradict your "argument"; make vague accusations of "hostility" and libel ... zzzzzzz

One thing you can rightly claim is prophecy, since in your original post you remarked:

Of course, I had a good laugh when I read this

That's a fair summary of this thread.
 
Upvote 0