• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Your plane crashes

Status
Not open for further replies.

MoonlessNight

Fides et Ratio
Sep 16, 2003
10,217
3,523
✟63,049.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
That's one of the problems I've had posing ethical questions to people. They always go against the spirit of the game and try to find the "way out". I don't know what yguy was after, but in my opinion the question i asked is what he is trying to ask.

I think that's because in these types of questions to go along with the "spirit of the game" you almost always have to accept a situation that would never happen or at the very least would have more possible solutions than the ones offered. And if the question isn't "what would you do in this situation if it happened to you" but rather "what would you do if the world was completely different so that you had to make this arbitrary choice (which probably is biased towards my particular world view in the analysis)." And that's just a game at that point.

I'll talk moral principles, discuss examples of them issue and talk about how they might apply to realistic situations, but I've never liked these gotcha games.
 
Upvote 0

Inviolable

Well-Known Member
Feb 27, 2006
2,285
59
✟3,179.00
Faith
Christian
Ooo I know!

You check the gun to see how many rounds it has.
If the gun is fully loaded you shoot twice in the air or toward the ceiling, "checking for blanks."
Then you call the dictator into the room announcing that you've killed a kid.
Once the dictator comes in to check out the dead kid you shoot him.

Or!

You ask the kids who their parents are. Seeing what nationality they are and hope that a special forces group arrives soon to save everyone.

Or!

You check the room out for a phone and if it has one you call for back up.

Or!

You look for a bathroom and see if you can fit any of the kids down the drain as an escape route.

Or!

You look for a bundle of clothes and see if you can disguise the kids as adults.

Or!

What the heck is the answer!
 
Upvote 0

Archer93

Regular Member
Nov 20, 2007
1,208
124
50
✟32,101.00
Faith
Pagan
Marital Status
Married
Zaac, the problem with your solution is that it isn't a solution- you've already been told to kill one of the children or they all die. By removing yourself you have failed to kill one of them, so now they're all dead.

I think I'd play the numbers game on this one- I'd shoot one to save the rest and try to live with it.
She says, sitting in her comfy office chair at at computer, thinking about going for lunch in about an hour.
It's impossible to tell what one would do, only what one thinks one would do.
 
Upvote 0

Jane_the_Bane

Gaia's godchild
Feb 11, 2004
19,359
3,426
✟183,333.00
Faith
Pagan
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
Politics
UK-Greens
I'd let the children decide; not in the sense of telling them to pick one (which would inevitably lead to them singling out a scrawny boy with glasses, or a fat one), but in the sense of giving them the option of volunteering for the job - and thus becoming the saviour of the rest. (This is, of course, assuming that "kill one" or "let all get killed" are indeed the only two options available.)
 
Upvote 0

b&wpac4

Trying to stay away
Sep 21, 2008
7,690
478
✟40,295.00
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Engaged
I think that's because in these types of questions to go along with the "spirit of the game" you almost always have to accept a situation that would never happen or at the very least would have more possible solutions than the ones offered. And if the question isn't "what would you do in this situation if it happened to you" but rather "what would you do if the world was completely different so that you had to make this arbitrary choice (which probably is biased towards my particular world view in the analysis)." And that's just a game at that point.

I'll talk moral principles, discuss examples of them issue and talk about how they might apply to realistic situations, but I've never liked these gotcha games.

I prefer the straight question myself.
 
Upvote 0

yguy

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2009
658
5
✟836.00
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Private
5. He wants to get to me,
You're close.
either for disobeying his order or for killing a child. Unlikely, ruthless dictators do not need convoluted scenarioes to accuse you of anything.
That's where you go astray.

For anyone else still interested, remember that the question isn't how to save any children. It's whether or not you obey the dictator.
 
Upvote 0

keith99

sola dosis facit venenum
Jan 16, 2008
23,142
6,837
73
✟404,962.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
You're close.That's where you go astray.

For anyone else still interested, remember that the question isn't how to save any children. It's whether or not you obey the dictator.

How so? If you make that the question youhave made the dictator the important one here. Then no matter how you decide he wins.

If you decide based on ht ekids and only the kids then they are the important ones and no matter what the dictator loses.
 
Upvote 0

yguy

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2009
658
5
✟836.00
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Private
Because I said so in the OP.
If you make that the question you have made the dictator the important one here. Then no matter how you decide he wins.
Wrong. To understand why, you need to know why he's doing it.
 
Upvote 0

Sojourner1

Following my Shepherd
Site Supporter
Jan 27, 2004
46,127
4,553
California
✟544,451.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Because I said so in the OP.Wrong. To understand why, you need to know why he's doing it.

The dictator's motivation is probably to get me to do something illegal so he can throw me in jail for the rest of my life or execute me.
 
Upvote 0

yguy

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2009
658
5
✟836.00
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Private
The dictator's motivation is probably to get me to do something illegal so he can throw me in jail for the rest of my life or execute me.
But as Freodin mentioned, why go through all that when you're a dictator? Why would he not just declare you guilty and do whatever he wants?
 
Upvote 0

Aeris

Regular Member
Feb 1, 2008
387
26
38
✟23,182.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
I dont know whether the answer is to listen or not, but perhaps the reasoning behind him setting up this situation is to put you in the position he is often in, do you as an authority figure do what is good for the majority while directly having a negative effect on an individual or small group or do you avoid directly hurting anyone at the possible cost of everyones well being?
 
Upvote 0

PhilosophicalBluster

Existential Good-for-Nothing (See: Philosopher)
Dec 2, 2008
888
50
✟31,346.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Wow. I read the first eight pages and it looks like the majority say 'do nothing'. It's true. One death is a tragedy. 100 is a statistic.

I would close my eyes and shoot one at random. My own clear conscience is not worth the lives of 99 children.
 
Upvote 0

PhilosophicalBluster

Existential Good-for-Nothing (See: Philosopher)
Dec 2, 2008
888
50
✟31,346.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
No, the dictator killed 100 children. Sojo is no more responsible for his actions than you are for mine.

Okay fine, you didn't actually kill them, but you had the opportunity to stop them from being killed and you didn't take it because you didn't want personal guilt.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.