Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I wouldnt imagine it does.doesnt literally mean every time we sing it must be a new song.
There is no 'but'.of course He wants our heart in it, but that doesnt mean do away with our God-given worship.
Are you saying the Sermon on the Mount is not part of the new covenant?It's important to know that, because if not, people tend to believe that stuff like the sermon on the mount and other expositions on the law is part of the gospel, that it belongs in the new covenant.
You believe you're inspired by the Holy Spirit, right? You've discarded certain parts (see below). You either believer you're justified in doing this, or not.Talking about what you said; "Anything you discard is 'justifable' because you claim the Holy Spirit is guiding you."
i wonder what you mean by that.
Yes you are. You said hair lengths can be ignored. And you re-write Paul's words on slavery as some kind of endorsement that's now irrelevant - you straw-manned Paul!I'm not discarding any part of the NT. And it's not so much about wisdom as it is about common sense.
Disagree with that, see above.Not throwing out a single thing. The NT is sufficient,
I agree. So what's with all the protestatns here demanding a finding in the NT of things such as 'responses to gospel reading'?but it's never been meant to be sufficient as some sort of rule book or guide to life in general.
So you're justified by the Spirit. Anything you do could be so justified. You might want to pick up James Hogg's The Private Memoirs and Confessions of a Justified Sinner: Written by Himself here's where you can buy it.In fact, the NT stresses that that's a function and responsibility of the Spirit.
Then you're back to discarding that part. Please make up your mind. Did the Holy Spirit inspire you to do this?The bible does NOT elevate itself to the role and position most christians have put it in. God has never meant the bible to be some sort of eternal rulebook on hair lengths.
OkayAnd BTW I've never argued "sola scriptura". Careful with those assumptions.
it is not up to me to decide upon the canon of the Bible. that has been done and I trust the brothers in Christ who did so.Tell me which of these are inspired, and which aren't
http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/
does not seem like a very polite thing to do to meIt's called Reductio ad absurdum
so, do you feel that you are expressing Christ?I'm not expressing myself, I'm not a Protestant!
I'm not saying you're not inspired.How do you know I'm not inspired, at all, (or not)? I can claim the Holy Spirit moves me and write an Epistle.
What makes you believe, for instance, that Luke was inspired? Is that Gospel self-proving?
How do you know that they were inspired?it is not up to me to decide upon the canon of the Bible. that has been done and I trust the brothers in Christ who did so.
It's a debating tooldoes not seem like a very polite thing to do to me
My church does.so, do you feel that you are expressing Christ?
If I am, and you are, why's God having us believe in opposite things so passionately that we're arguing over it?I'm not saying you're not inspired.
So you're judging it by yourself.I believe the bible is inspired, at large, as a matter of faith. I can't prove it, and I can't give you a good argument for which canon of the bible is the only correct one (or indeed, if there is only one "correct" one) because I haven't studied that well enough.
The reason I believe the bible, though, is because I've experienced it to be true. Not all the things that are written there, of course, but some. For instance, I believe the gospels are basically true because I've experienced that it's true that when I come to Christ, He does give me rest. And I figure that if Luke got that part right, he probably got the rest right too. Apart from the obvious errors like when the gospels disagree on smaller things like what the crucified thieves did with Jesus. But thankfully my faith doesn't depend on the bible being flawlessly dictated by God.
Amen sister! no respector of persons.In Christ we all are priests. In Christ there is no Jew and no Greek. The Lord is not a respector of persons. The job of the priest is to serve Christ to others. As a kingdom of priests we all can and should do that. Someone whose job is that of a priest is not necessarily any godlier than someone whose job is that of a carpenter.
Never mind, I had misread your post and thought that you had said or meant something which you did not.Umm, no... Have I misinterpreted something when I say that nobody says everybody are equally inspired?
![]()
from both the Lord Himself and from my brothers and sisters in ChristHow do you know that they were inspired?
does that make it proper for a Christian to use it?It's a debating tool
Do you feel that you personally are expressing Christ in your posts in this thread?My church does.
Yes, that's my personal belief. I belive that since Jesus, in His own words, had been sent only to the "lost sheep of the house of Israel" and since He had a habit of going around explaining and teaching the law, and since the new covenant simply hadn't been established yet, and since the sermon on the mount, unlike the gospel, tells you how you must perform to be saved, that yes, it most definitely belongs in the old covenant. But pointing forward to the new.Are you saying the Sermon on the Mount is not part of the new covenant?
I may be inspired, but I'm not infallible. I have the Spirit in me and with me, and I have common sense. I am also influenced by traditions and other people's opinions, though I try not to be.You believe you're inspired by the Holy Spirit, right? You've discarded certain parts (see below). You either believer you're justified in doing this, or not.
If you're not inspired by the Holy Spirit in doing this, then what would inspire you to do this? Your call!![]()
I'm not discarding it any more than you are discarding the mosaic commandments about animal sacrifices. We just realize that some things were for a certain time, for certain people. And, just like with the claims that the earth is flat, we probably agree that not everything in the bible can, or should, be taken literally and personally by us today; some things simply reflect the time and culture it was written in.Yes you are. You said hair lengths can be ignored. And you re-write Paul's words on slavery as some kind of endorsement that's now irrelevant - you straw-manned Paul!
Well, speaking for myself, it's just about the sad tendency we have to replace content with form, substance with tradition.I agree. So what's with all the protestatns here demanding a finding in the NT of things such as 'responses to gospel reading'?
Well, I don't seek to justify individual things I do. That's not how I live or think. I don't operate by law, I don't measure myself according to some set of commandments. I just... live. This has to do with my fundamental understanding of the gospel and of life with God. Probably too big a subject to debate in this threadSo you're justified by the Spirit. Anything you do could be so justified. You might want to pick up James Hogg's The Private Memoirs and Confessions of a Justified Sinner: Written by Himself here's where you can buy it.
I believe the Spirit inspires me to think for myself and use my intellect and my common sense.Then you're back to discarding that part. Please make up your mind. Did the Holy Spirit inspire you to do this?
I object to priests because the priests I see and meet are much more like the OT priests than... well, you and me, who are also priests, according to Paul. Even in the lutheran church here, there's still this sense that the priest is between God and the public, doing things on behalf of us and Him. I don't know how that works in orthodox churches though.Well then I don't get your objections to priests.
I really love it when people have no experience about Orthodoxy ....they admit it and still come to assumptions...I object to priests because the priests I see and meet are much more like the OT priests than... well, you and me, who are also priests, according to Paul. Even in the lutheran church here, there's still this sense that the priest is between God and the public, doing things on behalf of us and Him. I don't know how that works in orthodox churches though.
Protestantism makes everyone a Pope!