As for the question about whether Ivana Trump's Statement is accurate, as I stated in the original post, she of all people should know and given Donald's propensity to quote Hitler phrases only adds credence her account. Trump himself, when asked, didn't deny it but instead tried to brush it off by saying the book was given to him by a friend. As for "Unhumans" when dozens of independent authors report exactly the same quotes from it and even those who are touting the book don't deny the contents but instead bolster them, that's enough for me. I have no intention of reading it. I simply reported that Vance had championed it. "There are none so blind as those who will not see"."Widely reported" is in the category of ":everyone says." That has the implication of multiple sources. In this case what's "widely reported" is a claim by Ivana Trump. The one question (and the one I really thought you'd address) is whether Ivana Trump's statement is accurate. Having never known Ivana Trump, I can't say one way or the other. Note that Josephus' accuracy concerning the First Jewish Revolt has been questioned, so this is something that's common in history. The elephant in the room is whether the statement by an ex wife about a former spouse is always accurate. To this we can answer a definite "Maybe."
I'm sorry if you find this offensive, but this is part and parcel of history, whether it's Trump or Titus.
As to Unhuman, from experience I can say what is reported about a book may or may not be accurate. That's why I ended up reading Godsey's When We Talk About God, Let's Be Honest. The same for Caldwell's Tobacco Road. Read only opinions about a book, and you come away knowing the opinions but not the contents.
From your statement above, it appears you haven't read Unhuman either. Should you chose to do so, I recommend finding it in a library rather than buying a copy, if at all possible. That way, if you find it to be objectionable, you haven't spent money lining the author's pocket.
Upvote
0