If, as you state, homosexuals who claim to be christians are not christians, then they are just the sinners I was refering to. Their "claims" of being christian are irrelevant if that is so. And you may notice in those passages you quoted, it says NOTHING about seeking out those sinners and correcting them. I states get rid of the yeast in your midst. I'm sure that your church would in no way allow a homosexual through the door. (If they knew about it, anyways.) Why do you feel responsible for the churches of others?
Erm..no that is not "as I state" ....what I ACTUALLY SAID was:
"The folks in here do not claim to be lost sinners, they state they are a part of the body. So, your campaign is null and void on account of "sinners" right out of the gate. Read 1 Corinthians chapter 5 and 2 Timothy chapter 3:1-13
They also state that the Word of God does not say what it says, and they claim that homosexual activity is not sin, and they have made David a bisexual, Jonathan a homosexual, Joseph and Potipher bisexuals and Daniel a homosexual all in an effort to support their desires.
They have claimed that Romans 1:26-31 is referring to male homosexual temple prostitutes, in addition to claiming that the men in Sodom and Ghemorah were guilty of beastiality."
Therefore, your argument is still null/void.
uh huh. So then, if these people whom you have said are not looking to be corrected led or ministered to, of what profit is it bothering anyways?
I am not sure if you ever happen to notice the number of "visitors" in this forum. Very often I see over 50 people not logged in that are reading.
If those who post here want to be left alone and post their unBiblical teachings, in pursuit of affirmation and approval, let them get their affirmations from a non-Christian site.
If anyone in this forum wants to post unBiblical doctrine and pass it off as Biblical in public on a Christian site, well then they should surely expect it to be refuted, without direct invitation, by those who take their responsibility seriously and hold tight to what is good, and reject what is evil who are willing to be hated for the sake of souls for the cause of Christ, whether it be logged in readers or for those who are lurking that hear, not pretending to love them, but loving them for real according to Romans 12:8-9, which says: "If your gift is to encourage others, be encouraging. If it is giving, give generously. If God has given you leadership ability, take the responsibility seriously. And if you have a gift for showing kindness to others, do it gladly. Don’t just pretend to love others. Really love them. Hate what is wrong. Hold tightly to what is good."
how is refusing to confirm the viewpoint of fundamental christians as dyed in the wool bigots hypocritical? I don't remember them asking my opinion on the matter. If they did, I'd give it. If it seeks ME out, I'll refute it. I won't go looking for it.
And see here, you prove your hypocrisy, as you call us "fundamental Christians, dyed in the wool of bigots." which as you know I did report. Edited to add: and I see you took advantage of a mod's misunderstanding to weasel out of it. I get a snippy response for posting there and you can post away and it is no problem. That's okay.......whatever. First of all, I do not even know what you think a fundamental is. I always thought it referred to Baptists which I am not but if a fundamentalist is one who holds fast to the Scripture and our Faith, who fights the good fight of faith against all false theologies and doctrines, who looks to please God rather than win a popularity contest with men, by preaching to their itching ears what they want to hear, one who opposes mockers of the truth and profane work and cause of the cross of Christ, then by all means feel free to call me a fundamentalist.
But somehow I think it is your "Christian curse word" for Fascists, which is due to your own personal bigotry and not Biblically based.
I can't help it if your reading comprehension is a bit low. I did not call you a liar. In fact, I said pretty clearly that I'm sure you believe what you were saying.
I just doubt what you claimed is even POSSIBLE.
Look, for the 3rd time, if not 4th, this is what I said, and this is what I mean, so apparently it isn't my reading comprehension that is in question but your inability to hide the mustard stain that's on the front and center of your white shirt!
I said:
"There is no sin in my life that I have not yielded.
I have no "pet sins". And no, that doesn't mean I am without sin, it only means I have no sin that I want to keep and have coveted and choose to keep and practice. I am completely in agreement with God's Word and want His highest and best in my life and am clay in the potter's hand to do with as He wishes to make me more suitable for His purpose. I am not in any forums fighting for my sin and railing against Christians changing God's Word to make myself feel better in my attempt to justify it."
If you do not believe that it is possible for anyone to not have PET SINS, that is YOUR PROBLEM. But no matter what jig you try to do, or how you try to patronize me as if it is possible "only in my head" and you say you 'doubt that what I claim is even possible', then you are indeed calling me a liar.
one thread does not a proof make. The vitrolic nature of the entire subforum is not corrected by one thread!
I did not offer that to you to correct anything but your assumption.
The significance of that thread is that it was about fornicating heterosexuals who met the SAME OPPOSITION for their unBiblical claims and doctrine. There is actually a part ONE and part TWO of that thread if memory serves me correctly. It was longer than any of these threads. Quite a lot of posts.
I also have not been a member here that long, and this place is big, so don't worry I will make my rounds. In the meantime you should get off your high horse before you fall and hurt yourself.
(and just so it's noted, the scripture is being butchered in your presence, because you chose to seek it out. Not one person forced you to go into a forum you know FULL well will be like that. If it offends your sensibilites so very much, you are responsible for that, you went there on your own accord!)
I am not complaining about where I am, YOU ARE.
I have to wonder...how do you come upon various threads? How did you find your way to this one? Were you "seeking it out"? If not, then how are you to know how I came here or anyone else?
And as I said to you before, what concern is it to you anyway? How is it your responsibility one way or another, what area of ministry we decide to work in or at on any given day? Why do you feel the need to control where we minister or to whom we minister?
You work in whatever field God directs you and leave others to work
what ever field God directs them to. Okey doke?