Winconsin Supreme Court declines to hear Donald's appeal.

[TLK Valentine]

Wisconsin high court declines to hear Trump election lawsuit

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A split Wisconsin Supreme Court on Thursday refused to hear President Donald Trump’s lawsuit attempting to overturn his loss to Democrat Joe Biden in the battleground state, sidestepping a decision on the merits of the claims and instead ruling that the case must first wind its way through lower courts.

The defeat on a 4-3 ruling was the latest in a string of losses for Trump’s post-election lawsuits. Judges in multiple battleground states have rejected his claims of fraud or irregularities. Dissenting conservative justices said the decision would forever “stain” the outcome of the election.

Incidentally, Donald's lost about 200,000 Twitter followers since Election Day... guess the judges aren't the only ones who aren't listening to him anymore.

Thoughts?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Wisconsin high court declines to hear Trump election lawsuit



Incidentally, Donald's lost about 200,000 Twitter followers since Election Day... guess the judges aren't the only ones who aren't listening to him anymore.

Thoughts?

The Trumpsters are getting desperate and are attempting to jump the queue.

 

[Tanj]

Trump was looking to jump the gun and by pass that pesky procedure thing with requires the case start in the lower court and move up from there. The whole thing is predicated on eventually getting to SCOTUS, where Trump and his team believe the conservative, originalist judges they appointed will lose their minds and engage in outrageous judicial activism.

Good luck with that. They *still* haven't heard the case that went to them on election day concerning ballot receipt deadlines in PA.

 

[Blade]

Lol..yeah.. that's the whole story ok. This is like another thread where Bill Barr found nothing so its over. Haha.

Not all of the facts but.. it plays to a narrative. Hmm who are we. I was blind but I can see

 

[TLK Valentine]

Trump was looking to jump the gun and by pass that pesky procedure thing with requires the case start in the lower court and move up from there. The whole thing is predicated on eventually getting to SCOTUS, where Trump and his team believe the conservative, originalist judges they appointed will lose their minds and engage in outrageous judicial activism.

Good luck with that. They *still* haven't heard the case that went to them on election day concerning ballot receipt deadlines in PA.

Donald's getting frightened. He knows that unless he can strongarm SCOTUS before January 20th, he's cooked.

On that day, either Biden or Pelosi will be sworn in as President, and neither of them are going to allow these shenanigans to go on.

 

[Tanj]

Donald's getting frightened. He knows that unless he can strongarm SCOTUS before January 20th, he's cooked.

On that day, either Biden or Pelosi will be sworn in as President, and neither of them are going to allow these shenanigans to go on.

Well, in one of the cases (sorry, I don't remember which) Elite Seal Team Sux has actually argued that the constitution is unconstitutional.

Anyhoo, I have my bulk popcorn supplies pre ordered for post Dec 14th when Biden is formally elected for Trump to file a suite of lawsuits claiming the electoral college was unconstitutional.

 

[Tanj]

Twice in one day. Trump and his allies lost in the WI supreme court twice in one day.

Are you listening Guiness book of world records?

https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/12/2020AP1971-OA.pdf
https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/11/2020AP1958-OA-12-3-20.pdf

 

[TLK Valentine]

Twice in one day. Trump and his allies lost in the WI supreme court twice in one day.

Are you listening Guiness book of world records?

https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/12/2020AP1971-OA.pdf
https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/11/2020AP1958-OA-12-3-20.pdf

That's some pretty efficient failure, right there. Kudos to Team Donald.

 

[disciple Clint]

Wisconsin high court declines to hear Trump election lawsuit



Incidentally, Donald's lost about 200,000 Twitter followers since Election Day... guess the judges aren't the only ones who aren't listening to him anymore.

Thoughts?

He is likely better off on both counts. He needs to get this before the Supreme Court asap so getting rejected by the state court may work in his favor.

 

[Subduction Zone]

He is likely better off on both counts. He needs to get this before the Supreme Court asap so getting rejected by the state court may work in his favor.

What makes you think that the Supreme Court will even look at this? Without evidence they have no grounds for a decision. They will simply reject the cases.

 

[Pommer]

He is likely better off on both counts. He needs to get this before the Supreme Court asap so getting rejected by the state court may work in his favor.

Really?
How’s he going to appeal a State Law?
I mean, if they can assert a “Constitution” violation, sure.
But I ain’t seeing how such an appeal can be crafted, (IANAL).

 

[disciple Clint]

What makes you think that the Supreme Court will even look at this? Without evidence they have no grounds for a decision. They will simply reject the cases.

I do not think so.

 

[Subduction Zone]

I do not think so.

Why do you have such a low opinion of the Supreme Court?

 

[disciple Clint]

Why do you have such a low opinion of the Supreme Court?

Who said that I do.

 

[Pommer]

Who said that I do.

SCOTUS isn’t going to take any appeal that might be possible.
But let’s play “what if?”
What if they took the case(s)?
You really think that Roberts is going to want to be the last Chief Justice?

Joe Biden won.
He’s going to be President January 20, noon est.

 

[disciple Clint]

SCOTUS isn’t going to take any appeal that might be possible.
But let’s play “what if?”
What if they took the case(s)?
You really think that Roberts is going to want to be the last Chief Justice?

Joe Biden won.
He’s going to be President January 20, noon est.

Are you saying that you doubt the integrity of the Supreme Court?

 

[7thKeeper]

Are you saying that you doubt the integrity of the Supreme Court?

I'm having a bit of trouble how that relates to what you were replying to. Can you clarify a bit? It seems disjointed to me. Thank you.

 

[disciple Clint]

I'm having a bit of trouble how that relates to what you were replying to. Can you clarify a bit? It seems disjointed to me. Thank you.

My question is what the previous poster is saying when he said "You really think that Roberts is going to want to be the last Chief Justice?" Why would he poster think that taking the case might result in Roberts being the last Chief Justice?

 

[Tanj]

Alito asked for defendant responses on the 9th, the day after safe harbour. That's the end of that.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Who said that I do.

You did.