Okay but what about the conflict between Gen 7:4 and John 3:16, you still haven't answered that.Crispie said:Genesis 7
1 The LORD then said to Noah, "Go into the ark, you and your whole family, because I have found you righteous in this generation.
Many men have been righteous, such as Noah and Job. Now when did Righteous always mean Sinless? Look at the translation of the word righteous for this verse.
challenger said:
You've missed my point:Crispie said:This verse, John 3:16, applies to when Jesus came, not before then. Obviously no one can believe in Jesus as their saviour untill God actually sends Jesus onto the earth, makes the sacrifice, and teaches everyone of Jesus. That isnt a contradiction at all. Look more closely at what your saying next time.
My point is that God destroyed the entire world that he supposedly loved, what about little kids who couldn't make a moral choice yet. Think about a different version of the flood account for a second, where some little kid sees her parents drown and then drowns herself in total terror, completely unaware of why this is all happening. Some conservative Christians get all upset over a dead fetus ("look at its little heart beat, its a alive!"), but they don't seem to mind a few hundred million kids drowning to satisfy their megolomaniacal volcano god's twisted anger.Crispie said:This also applys to why God justly punishes those who deserve it, such as the very sinful people of noahs time.
So what's the point then, if you're saying that death doesn't matter and its not that important that God wiped out a couple million kids because they're in heaven then why does God bother with mortal existence in the first place? Why aren't kids given the same free will that adults are? Couldn't God have just vapourised all of the sinners or somthing, instead of going for this rediculously complex flood business? And what about all those innocent, souless (according to Christianity) animals, what did they do to deserve such a horrible death?Crispie said:Ever think that those little kids will be going to heaven after they die? Pretty good deal if you ask me, die now and be able to go to a perfect paradise, doesnt sound like a Cruel God to me. (Children that are young enouph do go to heaven automatically).
Why did God have to flood the Earth to do that, don't you think that's a little OTT for somebody for whom "all things are possible", couldn't he just have disintegrated them or just made them all go to sleep and never wake up. Why so viscious?Crispie said:Look, God basically wiped out most of the existance on earth for a REASON. Dont you relize basically everyone besides Noah at that time was very sinful and destructive, and were hellbound. Dont you think that its good of God to get rid of that, and have a new start with Righteous people over allowing all that sin to spread and just send more people to hell? In the long run Gods doing saved a lot of people from hell.
challenger said:Why did God have to flood the Earth to do that, don't you think that's a little OTT for somebody for whom "all things are possible", couldn't he just have disintegrated them or just made them all go to sleep and never wake up. Why so viscious?
http://www.christianforums.com/showthread.php?p=8467460#post8467460
You're still skipping merrily around my point, and I've started another thread for this anyway. So Crispie Why such a cruel method of execution?Crispie said:Look, if God gives you the chance to go to heaven or hell, he's giving you a fair chance to choose what you want. If you want to disobey God, the one who gave you life and had his own son die for you in order to be forgiven, then be prepared for the consequences. All your doing is giving your opinion on what a "Good" God is. You should never start thinking up your own ideas on what God should be, since we cant even start to begin to comprehend perfection, let alone the existance of God.
So your God is a wrathful, vengeful tyrant that punishes everybody in the most horrible ways he can come up with? I thought you said that the innocents (like the little kids + such) all went to heaven, why did they deserve to die horribly, couldn't God have found a more merciful way?Crispie said:Flooding the entire world was one of the best ways to get rid of those people, and everything else sinful. There is no such thing as innnocent suffering. Did it ever come to you that maybe they deserved to be drowned in the flood?
Look, STOP with the opinions. I answered these before. Look there is no such thing as innocent suffering, all have sinned and have fell short of the glory of God. IF you really need a better explanation, sigh, then read this. http://christiananswers.net/q-eden/edn-t023.html Now stop with opinions PLEASE. At least God didnt make the world go up in flames to kill all those people, and did you know drowning is one of the most peaceful ways to die?challenger said:So your God is a wrathful, vengeful tyrant that punishes everybody in the most horrible ways he can come up with? I thought you said that the innocents (like the little kids + such) all went to heaven, why did they deserve to die horribly, couldn't God have found a more merciful way?
This is off topic anyway, can you please take it to the other thread?
These are your added views on them and interpretations of them. When they are read palin as day simply as to what they say...they contradict. Now if course if you add to it your ideas about what you think the verses REALLY mean then of course you can make them not contradict..but without your twist on what you think they REALLY mean, they contradcit.Both Luke 12:51 and Matthew 10:34 are talking about the same thing, putting God above everything, even your own family. Jesus purpose was never to come to Earth and bring Peace to all the world, but to save mankind from sin.
Read John 14:17. The peace Jesus leaves with us is not the peace that the world gives, but Jesus gives us the peace of us not being troubled nor being afraid, through the Holy Spirit. The "contradictions" you talk about have nothing to do with eachother.