Thank you for all of your answers. I'm reading up on some of your conversions and this new concept of theoism. I do see Orthodoxy as the first "gatherings" of the Apostles. Don't know the wording, but I do see and recognize that Orthodox came first, which is why I'm studying it. I'm curious.
The thing that scares me away the most (haven't been to a parish yet), but tradition scares the crap out of me. I love to love the Lord and I personally see that everyone has different ways of pleasing Christ. Hence different body parts metaphor. I think I asked this before, don't remember, but what book out there will help guide me into understanding what I will see at a parish service. I want to understand before I go. To avoid confusion of course.
Also, does the Orthodox Church have their own compilation of scripture? And can someone explain some of the basic differences between RC and Orthodox? I can gather some differences, but at face value can someone explain them to me?
Thank you all so far, I am enjoying your responses and they all have been helpful.
Glory to Jesus Christ.
What about tradition is scary, exactly -- traditions in and of themselves? Or the fact that you would have to set aside personal feelings to embrace the teachings of Apostolic Christianity? A lot of Orthodox Christians will tell you that one of the hardest things to do in embracing the Church is leaving behind the "baggage" we're all so accustomed to.
The heart, my friend, is deceitful above all things, as the epistles read. A happy, joyous feeling does not constitute truth at all. I'm not saying that the only reasons you believe what you believe is because of how you feel, but I know that when I was a part of the charismatic "revival"/holiness type groups, my faith wasn't based on reason, only how emotionally-charged I was, how much my heart would leap for joy at the messages I heard. I figured that if this was how it felt to be "saved", the messages I heard were from the Bible, this is what I get from "worship", this must be what's right.
However, Tradition definitely shows that this was not the way, not two thousand years ago, not even two hundred years ago. Spontaneous worship is an entirely Protestant idea that started around the 1600's or so, and Word of Faith/Pentecostalism in the late 1900's.
That's the beauty of Tradition -- showing us what we should truly be afraid of, as opposed to what we feel is right or wrong(amongst many other things). What has been passed down since Pentecost? What has been innovated since that time?
Do I think you're doomed? I'd sooner fear for the souls here and anywhere who think you're doomed! Our God is a loving, merciful God, and I fear for my own salvation as one who knows the Truth and doesn't practice it with zeal before I would fear for any Protestant's salvation who puts all they have into faith, works, and practice. However, I would cease to hold onto any belief in Orthodoxy if I believed that Protestantism is the unaltered Truth. I believe that Protestants are, though loved by the Lord, in schism with the Church and it is a true tragedy.
You mentioned different ways of pleasing Christ. Where has it been taught? Where can I find commentary from the early Church on this? How can I know with certainty that these expressions or worship are legitimate... I want to give you food for thought and hope that I cause no offense:
Abel offered what he
knew for certain was pleasing to God. Cain offered what he
thought was pleasing to God. Who's sacrifice was acceptable in His sight? Were Cain's feelings applicable in this situation?
Good questions my friend. Just try to remember that Orthodoxy is not a faith that's found in the books, it's a faith that's practiced and learned in the heart and only there, with illumination from the Holy Spirit. You will learn more through attending Divine Liturgy and praying with the Church than you will reading books on the sidelines.
+ Peace be with your spirit,
Isaac