• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Why the Sabbath is a moral commandment

DamianWarS

Follower of Isa Al Masih
Site Supporter
May 15, 2008
10,077
3,424
✟978,841.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Yes I agree, a 10 commandment vacuum was never the intent plus in practice our motivations go well beyond the 10 (as they should). I feel like often a call to the 10 is more about highlighting the sabbath (and for something reason dietary laws)
I like to end with a song, hynm, or spiritual song
Psalm 144:9
I will sing a new song to you, God. On a ten-stringed lyre, I will sing praises to you
Taking time to pause and reflect is always beneficial and I appreciate the focus. I've been listening to a new song by river valley worship called "Testify". It's catchy and easy to listen to but I've been pulled in my the lyrics. chorus is:

"For all my days I'll sing Your praise as a testament to Your faithfulness

"For all my life I'll lift you high
Your the one who brought me back to life
 
Last edited:
Reactions: Leaf473
Upvote 0

Leaf473

Well-Known Member
Jul 17, 2020
9,145
2,531
55
Northeast
✟231,822.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The Ten Commandments reflect core moral principles of God's law,
I'm not aware of a scripture that says this

Blessings!

 
Upvote 0

DamianWarS

Follower of Isa Al Masih
Site Supporter
May 15, 2008
10,077
3,424
✟978,841.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private

It's the "including the 10 commandments" parts that have historically been loaded in these discussions and carries a meaning closer to a 10 commandments vacuum. The 10 are a part of the torah. The Torah as a whole, and not an isolated part, reflects the nature of God.


It indeed is problematic. The 10 commandments inherit the implicit morality of God which is the same for all laws so there is no cause to isolate the 10 by looking through this morality. This moral framework needs to be taken in context, some are universally moral and don't need a written law to be known. In contrast, others have deeper meaning, and their surface components do not describe moral action but need revelation to understand their role within a moral framework.

Laws of ceremonial, ritual, symbolic, etc.. in natural need further unpacking to understand their deeper meanings, where alone their moral counterpart is hidden. For example, separation laws like not mixing grains or threads or not breeding different species (like a horse or a donkey to make a mule). These do not involve moral action and if I take two grains and mix them together it is not a moral failing. Laws like this have purpose in a grander plan of salvation and a call for holiness. (but God doesn't actually care about mixing grains) If we put a blanket statement over all law and call it moral then this doesn't help to articulate morality well and is a non-critical way of approaching the subject because it doesn't qualify moral behaviour vs something like ritual or ceremonial acts.

The act of the ceremony or ritual do not describe moral action innately, they are deep with meaning and they point to something bigger with a moral base. Sabbath is such a law since ritual rest is not of moral action which is why the Sabbath must be understood spiritually to understand it's universal aspect and role in a larger plan.


I'm not trying to trap you but earlier you stated "But these commandments, as mentioned before are not replacements for the Ten Commandments; they are the foundation of them all." So, which is the foundation of which? Christ's says the law and the prophets hang upon these two commandments (Christ's law) and by these words I see Christ's law as foundational to all law even to the 10 commandments.

You're taking "arbitrarily" out of context (if it's a comment on my use of the word). God doesn't do anything arbitrarily, but we do all the time. The way we approach law may miss the point and not be aligned with God purpose. We may interpret arbitrary action or definition out of law that does not reflect its intent but is more agenda-driven.

The moral role of the 10 I would suggest is more driven at depaganising Israel by establishing core monotheistic principles and worldviews that align with God's character that were otherwise inconsistent with surronding cultures; it's a polemic to the surrounding cultural laws of the day. Moses essentially christens the 10 by destroying it in rage against violators of it. Christ, however wasn't trying to depaganize Israel, they were vehemently monotheistic by that time, but suffered from legalism and lost focus of the spirit of the law. Christ's law in its simplicity and heuristic approach can be a polemic to legalism and a return to core values of love and sacrifice. He does not highlight the 10 here and we should take pause at that, he instead indiscriminately lumps it together without hierarchy and says it all "hang upon these two commandments".

I sense a "but" here...
Christ law operates at a deeper foundation than the 10 do (by explicit definition) and they are more exhaustive than the 10 from their heuristic approach (the 10 are not a heuristic, it is black and white do or don't). Although the 10 might have been foundational to the Hebrews it is not to us, as we have deeper foundational revelation from Christ and it is the deeper that is better.

Christ speaks of the abstract of goodness as lawful action on the Sabbath. He could have said something more limiting like saving a life or healing (which is often the interpretation) but he chose an example of saving sheep that can have intentional wide application both physical and spiritual. Rescuing sheep is a major flag that we should recognize instantly as not about sheep but about people, and not about their physical state but their spiritual state. He calls it out himself saying "how much more valuable are people". I'll connect the dots... how much more valuable is the spiritual state than the physical too?

Sabbath rest is counter-productive when we hoard it, inbeded in the commandment is ensure all those under your care have rest. Christ took a localised expression of "neighbour" and essentially turn it into a meaning for all. When keeping Christ's law, we are not just concerned about our inner circle but should be concerned for those as wide and far as possible as to how we are called. A better goal is to share sabbath than to hoard it which is inline with NT teaching (even if it involves work). I'm not talking about physical rest, I'm talking about spiritual rest. Goodness is mechanism of lawful action that we cannot merely sweep under a rug. Trapped sheep is a metaphor for the lost so there is an implicit missional charge in this goodness on the sabbath. It is not just lawful, but it is a better way aligning with Christ's law over the letter of the 4th; Christ is showing us how the 4th looks through his lens.

It is about his kingdom and spreading the glory of God as far and wide as possible but some too busy resting to hear the bleating sheep trapped in pits that surround them. If those in a 50 m radius haven't experienced God's rest then this is a call to work, not a call to rest. We have physical limits and I don't mean to suggest at the cost of our health but if we can't justify helping our neighbour or instead avoid them on the Sabbath too fearful of turning them down because it would violate our practice of rest then we are prioritizing rest over being able to connect with people. I intentionally seek to help my neighbour (they are all Muslim) and if it's the sabbath and he asks me to help move a couch I'm happy to assist and praise God while doing so. My goal is missionally driven and is not to break rest (even if the latter is the product)

I'm not interested in how or if you rest, I'm interested in how you spread his glory. In this space there is no violation of any laws.
Foundational principles to oppose competing pagan values of surrounding cultures. The moral goal of the 10 is less about love for neighbour, and more about a standard that is intentionally counter-cultural and separate from these competing cultures. This has to be established first as a framework for love to happen because if we killing each other, stealing, lying and having orgies, or if we have a stack of idols in our cloest this is a destructive environment where love cannot flourish. destructive but common in surrounding cultures (and apparently within Israel as well such as what we see demonstrated countless times). That destructive environment needs to be recalibrated before love can flourish and that's what the 10 do. Similar to the creation acount it is also a polemic of the Egyptian or Sumerian cosmology myths. It's designed to depaganise and to align with monotheistic values while also showing a plan for salvation. The literal details of it to me are the most uninteresting part of the account. Law has a similar focus.

I am not challenging the standard the law sets. I am challenging our motivation for keeping it and the way we value Christ's revelation of it.
As should be the motivation behind all obedience
It is the spiritual component of the Sabbath that is the blessing. Physical restoration has value indeed, and it is its own blessing. In the practice of Sabbath you're going to have the benefits of the physical aspects. But the spiritual blessing of the sabbath is greater and should be our focus over the physical. Some are not able to gain the physical benefits because of the a physical depraved state they are in, but they still are able to have access to the spiritual rest. If you already have the spiritual blessing, then we should share it. I like Paul's focus here "I do this all for the sake of the gospel that I might share in its blessing" (1 Cor 9:23). So yes, I missionally approach the Sabbath.
I broadly agree, yet we do not practice all aspects of law. There seems to be an underlying "but" here and and an elevated value of the 10 over the others. Which part of the law are we to keep and which parts are we no longer under obligation to keep? Why are some this way and others that way? Because the measure still seems to be if it's the 10 commandments or not.

Let's start with circumcision as it is a mirror role of the Sabbath in the Abrahamic covenant. (Both are signs of everlasting covenants) What is our obligation to value the commandment of God to circumcise all males in the flesh? Or do we follow NT teaching and see ourselves not under the physical obligation, but instead view it as a spiritual obligation? Can this be applied to Sabbath.... I'm sure the answer that will be returned will amount to no... So why not? Why is circumcision revealed through spiritual means, with a greater focus on the spiritual and Sabbath not? What is more important? Physical rest or spiritual? So which should we value more, physical rest or the spiritual? What NT teaching reinforces sabbath law so that it shows us a continued obligation to this physical ritual of rest?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0