Why the 'obsession' with homosexuality?

[Beanieboy]

Come on, people. Everyone knows that the penis and vagina were only designed for urination. Wait a minute...

 

[Beanieboy]

Try eating a hotdog through your eye. Organs are designed for "a" purpose. Sexual organs are not lungs. The waste elimination "organs" are not designed for sex. The mouth and palate are not designed as sex organs. Let's just stick to logic and reason. Body parts show sexual orientation only one way. Unless of course you're born deformed (abnormal) as a hermaphodite. Otherwise stick to what normal design shows is normal function.

You can't sell gay sex with your analogy. A penis isn't designed for mouth or rectum. And please, show us all the functions of the penis, and you will still never get it near the mouth or rectum as part of its functioning system. Except of course by accident or choice. But still, that is not the fault of the organ in question. And a vagina is not designed for another vagina.

So, you are against heterosexual oral sex, heterosexual anal sex, and heterosexual manual sex, all which are common?
Where are your multiple threads against heterosexual oral sex?

 

[WhatThe]

Er... Polycarp... the penis is a waste organ, too...
Unless you pee from somewhere else... your eye, maybe?

 

[EnemyPartyII]

"Christian" Forums right? Why are the non and anti-Christians here? That is a more appropriate question.

I'm a Christian. So if you'd like to stop answering a question with a question, and explain why someone who claims to be happy to live and let live is here decrying the evil of homosexuality?

Like I wrote, up until you want to teach my children about gay sex,

What is wrong with wanting to teach children about reality?

No need to bring up sexual acts to be protected as a minority status.

There is if there are people discrimnating against people because of those sex acts. If people know that homosexuality exists and we aren't slavering monsters out to destroy humanity, then people won't discrimnate against us, right? People fear the unknown and unusual. Sop, by educating people, you defuse the potential for misunderstanding. Same is true for ANY minority group.

They should be private and not part of public schools UNLESS it biologically sound.

Homosexuality is biologically sound, otherwise we wouldn't see it as such a universal trait amongst so many varieties of biological entity. *sigh* I'm at work, but if you want, when I get home I can cite you as many peerr reviewed articles as you like that suggest homosexuality is a biologically fit trait, particularly in social animals.

In Christian culture there is no such thing as same-gender marriage.

Your idea of Christian culture. Not Christian culture per ce. Big difference.

"God" didn't design it that way.

Says you. I disagree, and the science seems to back me up.

 

[Polycarp_fan]

That all reads a bit deranged. Were you attempting to make a point? I think I have conclusively shown that all body parts are not designed for one pupose. Natural selection can hone an organ to perform many functions,

Oh, natural selection? Natural selection is the harshest thing of all to homosexuality. Or rather the individual homosexual. Talk about discrimination and bullying. Yes please, let's go with sceince. It takes away all of the emotionalism.

 

[EnemyPartyII]

Try eating a hotdog through your eye. Organs are designed for "a" purpose. Sexual organs are not lungs. The waste elimination "organs" are not designed for sex. The mouth and palate are not designed as sex organs. Let's just stick to logic and reason. Body parts show sexual orientation only one way. Unless of course you're born deformed (abnormal) as a hermaphodite. Otherwise stick to what normal design shows is normal function.

You can't sell gay sex with your analogy. A penis isn't designed for mouth or rectum. And please, show us all the functions of the penis, and you will still never get it near the mouth or rectum as part of its functioning system. Except of course by accident or choice. But still, that is not the fault of the organ in question. And a vagina is not designed for another vagina.

Multi function does not mean ALL functions are interchangeable.

No, you can't eat a hot dog through your eye. But You CAN both see and excrete through your eye.

You can't eat a hotdoig through your liver, but you CAN both detoxify blood and produce bile with it.

You can't eat a hotdog through your penis, but you CAN both urinate and inseminate with it.

You can't eat a hot dog through your lungs, but you CAN both respire and acid buffer your blood with them.

You can't eat a hot dog with your anus, but you CAN both excrete and be sexually stimulated with it.

See how that works? Multifunctionality. Amazing stuff.

 

[WhatThe]

If the anus is unable to be used for sexual intercourse, then why is the prostate placed in such a position that anal sex stimulates it?

 

[EnemyPartyII]

Oh, natural selection? Natural selection is the harshest thing of all to homosexuality. Or rather the individual homosexual. Talk about discrimination and bullying. Yes please, let's go with sceince. It takes away all of the emotionalism.

Lets bump these tired PRATTS on the herad right now... before you say anything further...

A. Non reproducing individuals often contribute to the overall health of population in social organisms (consider lions, wolves, and bees)

B. Homosexuality can be passed on as a genetic trait perfectly well as a RECESSIVE trait, like many, many other genetic traits that result in a homozygous individual failing to produce offspring (consider cystic fibrosis or sickle cell anaemia, both genetic traits that are passed on ass recessive traits, as the homozygous individual dous not reproduce)

 

[Polycarp_fan]

I'm a Christian. So if you'd like to stop answering a question with a question, and explain why someone who claims to be happy to live and let live is here decrying the evil of homosexuality?

I am to love my fellow Christians. Promoting homosexuality is not something a Christian should do. I show that with scripture. I just use the New Testament as it is. I don't alter it for the Humanist Manifesto and politics.

What is wrong with wanting to teach children about reality?There is if there are people discrimnating against people because of those sex acts.

Sex acts should be a private matter. Also, no Christian should engage in same-gender sex acts. It is a decent thing to help sinners out of sinning. According to the New Testament witness.

If people know that homosexuality exists and we aren't slavering monsters out to destroy humanity, then people won't discrimnate against us, right? People fear the unknown and unusual.

People fear that their children will be taught inappropriate things by inappropriate people. Gay sex is an inappropriate thing to teach children. And certainly I would not adherants of it to teach it to other people's children. I don't see it as such an innocent thing as you do. I see it as a symptom of a troubled world.

Sop, by educating people, you defuse the potential for misunderstanding. Same is true for ANY minority group.Homosexuality is biologically sound, otherwise we wouldn't see it as such a universal trait amongst so many varieties of biological entity. *sigh* I'm at work, but if you want, when I get home I can cite you as many peerr reviewed articles as you like that suggest homosexuality is a biologically fit trait, particularly in social animals.

A square peg in a round hole. I don't agree with your position. That unreasoning animlas engage in same-gender sex acts is not a great selling point to promote it to humans.

Your idea of Christian culture. Not Christian culture per ce.

Just the Christian culture preached by Jesus and the Apostles. There is not one place that condones or promotes Christians to engage in same-gender sex. But many places that preach proper sexual behavior.

Big difference.Says you. I disagree, and the science seems to back me up.

Science backs up the abnormality of same-sex attractions. It is always in the extreme minority and is aberrant behavior. Even more so the attempts at it. Christians should stick to humanity the way it is taught "in the New Testament." There is also no indication that we are to expect a change in marriage or sexual behaviors "for Christians" 2000-years (or longer) from its creation. I'm here as a Christian only. I don't care what pagans do. And we know what pagans do.

 

[Polycarp_fan]

Lets bump these tired PRATTS on the herad right now... before you say anything further...

A. Non reproducing individuals often contribute to the overall health of population in social organisms (consider lions, wolves, and bees)

B. Homosexuality can be passed on as a genetic trait perfectly well as a RECESSIVE trait, like many, many other genetic traits that result in a homozygous individual failing to produce offspring (consider cystic fibrosis or sickle cell anaemia, both genetic traits that are passed on ass recessive traits, as the homozygous individual dous not reproduce)

And this is your salespitch, your justification for humans to engage in same-gender sex acts? It's either animal behavior or a birth defect. What is your vote?

I'm out of here for the night.

 

[Verv]

What you present is bigotry pure and simple.

If you posted the hatred and lies about blacks that you post about gays and lesbians it would be called bigotry
If you posted the hatred and lies about Jews that you post about gays and lesbians it would be called bigotry
If you posted the hatred and lies about women that you post about gays and lesbians it would be called bigotry
If you posted the hatred and lies about Muslims that you post about gays and lesbians it would be called bigotry
If you posted the hatred and lies about Buddhists that you post about gays and lesbians it would be called bigotry
If you posted the hatred and lies about the handicapped that you post about gays and lesbians it would be called bigotry


Just because you display your hatred for one minority doesn’t change what you post into something good or moral

Hey, cha-cha-check it out...

Most of us Christianskies here love gays. In fact, we subscribe to the "GOLDEN RULE" of loving our neighbors as how we love ourselves.

We forgive others so that we may be forgiven;

I think you are just jealous because our ideological foundation prevents us from bigotry even in the smallest forms while you wallow stooped like an angry hunchback in your own rage against Christendom.

 

[WhatThe]

A teacher may say "Some men love women, some mem love men, some women love men, and some women love women." or "Some people have a mum and dad, or one mum or dad, or two mums, or two dads" and that "All of these families are just as good as the other".
Nothing wrong with that. At all.

But you seem to think that teachers are going to start saying "Be gay! Go and have as much gay sex as you can! Here, i'll show you how!"
Which is absolutely ridiculous.

 

[katautumn]

My personal theory is that some Christians are preoccupied with homosexuality because if it isn't merely a sinful lifestyle choice it proves the Bible is not the infallible Word of God. It threatens the very basis of their religion - that everything Christians know and believe come from the Bible, which is considered to be without one single error.

The only way to keep proving your sacred text is the only correct and divinely inspired one is to swiftly silence and shoot down any sort of behavior that could be completely genetic that would contradict it.

 

[EnemyPartyII]

People fear that their children will be taught inappropriate things by inappropriate people. Gay sex is an inappropriate thing to teach children. And certainly I would not adherants of it to teach it to other people's children. I don't see it as such an innocent thing as you do. I see it as a symptom of a troubled world.

I don't think that anyone is actually trying to teach children about the specific mechanics of gay sex, rather, about the existance of gay people. How is the knowledge of the existance of homosexuals threatening to anyone's children?

A square peg in a round hole. I don't agree with your position. That unreasoning animlas engage in same-gender sex acts is not a great selling point to promote it to humans.

Who's talking about it as a trait in animals? I can provide you with a bunch of evidence supporting the idea homosexuality is a beneficial trait in human populations too. Want some?

Just the Christian culture preached by Jesus and the Apostles. There is not one place that condones or promotes Christians to engage in same-gender sex. But many places that preach proper sexual behavior.

Chapter and verse where Jesus condemns homosexuality? No, didn't think so.

Science backs up the abnormality of same-sex attractions.

Citation needed.

It is always in the extreme minority and is aberrant behavior.

Just like left handedness or blue eyes.

There is also no indication that we are to expect a change in marriage or sexual behaviors "for Christians" 2000-years (or longer) from its creation.

So... the historical fact that there have been massive changes in the concept of marriage over the past 2000 years already is lost on you?

I'm here as a Christian only. I don't care what pagans do. And we know what pagans do.

Who's talking about pagans?

And this is your salespitch, your justification for humans to engage in same-gender sex acts? It's either animal behavior or a birth defect. What is your vote?

Its neither. Its a human trait, like many others. It being genetic does not mean it is a defect, it being a common behaviour with animals does not make it an "animal behaviour"

 

[cantata]

My justification for gay sex has nothing to do with animals or birth defects. It's just that women are totally hot.

 

[EnemyPartyII]

My justification for gay sex has nothing to do with animals or birth defects. It's just that women are totally hot.

Its true. We are.

 

[WhatThe]

My justification for gay sex has nothing to do with animals or birth defects. It's just that women are totally hot.

I'll third that!

 

[Polycarp_fan]

Hey, cha-cha-check it out...

Most of us Christianskies here love gays. In fact, we subscribe to the "GOLDEN RULE" of loving our neighbors as how we love ourselves.

We forgive others so that we may be forgiven;

I think you are just jealous because our ideological foundation prevents us from bigotry even in the smallest forms while you wallow stooped like an angry hunchback in your own rage against Christendom.

To watch the tactics of the gay ideologue is truly fascinating. I once thought that Sodom and Gomorrah were metaphor, but now I watch the reality of the places in people and cities and a society of today, so much like them, there's no way they are fairy tales. Lot was probably called a an angry hunchback by a sodomite as they desired to teach the two angels all about their brand of hospitality. They may have even tried to prove how natural homosexual rape is. It does happen in the animal kingdom too. And seeing what gays do "in the Church," it is all too common in humans. Oh where or where will the convoluted world of gay justification lead us. Looking at our youth cultute today, right back to Sodom and Gomorrah. And seeing how cunning GLBT's use neologism and wierd sceince, that too will be labeled as something palatable for mass consumption (even more). And if that too is rejected, it will get the insults and lawsuit treatment. It's going to be forced on the populace, every man, woman, child and pets and livestock. Until the cry of the people about it again reaches the Lord.

"There's nothing new under the sun."

Here we go again.

 

[cantata]

The paranoia is hilarious. There is no gay conspiracy, and non-heterosexual people are not a homogeneous mass of psychotic child rapists (just like not all Christians are a homogeneous mass of psychotic child rapists, I guess). Get some perspective.

 

[sidhe]

I think this already made an appearance in this thread, but for an encore...