"The difference here is that you don't believe it is available to you."
The rest of it is "Just Another" rationalization (among MANY) for why healing generally DOESN'T WORK.
It generally does. It does show that healings can take time, and you have to hang in there by faith.
Sure I do. Intellectually, according to the Word, I know it's POTENTIALLY available to me (and everybody else - Isaiah 53 pretty much settles that issue). I said nothing to indicate the contrary, of course.
(Why healing generally doesn't work.) You've indicated that God hasn't chosen to heal you and that you don't have an ounce of faith that He will.
Intellectually being available to you and you not receiving because of your rationalization that God's best for you is not available to you because of some higher "wisdom". That seems to be contrary to believing it is available to you.
But I don't have any "revelation"/SPECIFIC FAITH that He HAS healed me (no "Substance", or "Evidence") NOW.
You're saying that you don't have harvest faith. If you agree with what God has said, and
plant the seed of the Word (promise) in your heart, it will grow and bear fruit. You won't get a harvest immediately. That planting will have a harvest if you don't draw back through unbelief. Also... if you meet the conditions regarding obtaining His blessings.
Really, the conditions are heart conditions, and what goes on in our bodies typically is a reflection of what's going on in the heart.
"That it is available for you, if you meet the conditions."
<This is a "Job's friends" type of answer. What do YOU think the "Conditions are"?? Are you among those who believes that Job "caused HIS OWN problems" (seems to be a popular false teaching in some WoF paradigms)??
Jesus said to ask WHAT YOU WILL and you'll receive. The conditions are believing and abiding in His Word and in His love. Also, to forgive. (This is not a Job's thing, it's a Word thing.) What love is, is depicted throughout the Bible, so being a do'er of the Word is the perquisite to receiving.
If God doesn't change and we're not to forget His benefits, and His Word DOES state that we're to judge ourselves and not do things that make for the enemy afflicting us, a
nd we're not receiving that benefit, then something got in the way and it keeping you from receiving.
Your answer is "NO" then - they DON'T ALWAYS get healed when you law hands on 'em. Why not just admit it? We all know that "Healing", when it manifests, normally comes as a "surprise" to both the one prayed for, and the one who ministers,
If you take Jesus' Word about believers laying hands on the sick and they WILL recover, and the recovery is a surprise, then you're saying the fulfillment of God's Word is a surprise?
Realistically, the one receiving prayer has a part in receiving the healing. The passage demonstrates that healing grace is available. We know from the Word that the doubleminded won't receive anything from God. This goes back to having to get the revelation about this and then choosing to appropriate it.
The WORD IS always true, of course. Our INTERPRETATION of the Word according to our paradigms may not be, however.
What if when Jesus said "THEY WILL RECOVER" that they actually would, if they received and did not forfeit the blessing.
The "they will recover" is an indication of the healing benefit ready to be manifested by believers for believers. God does heal unbelievers, but generally not unbelieving "believers". Of course you have to submit for the revelation and be willing to put our understanding on the shelf
and not speak contrary to the Word.
Been listening to him on and off for over 40 years now.
You do know that He believes every believer can get healed of every disease?
And of course his cited revelation (which I Believe without question) obviously indicates that the person WOULD NOT recover when hands were layed on them - for a SPECIFIC REASON (not given).
This is what I am talking about where believers need to judge themseles. Yes, the secret things belong to the Lord. I suppose people make judgments and cannot enter in to some of their inheritance. It's all about repentance and faith.
This is not a "Job's counselors" type of thing. This is a case where God judges a person when they do not judge themselves. I suppose sometimes the undiscerned cause can go back a little ways.
SO it's all well and good to tell me I've got to believe that Jesus WOULDN'T "lie about believers laying hands on the sick and they will recover" - and then you go right ahead and indicate that sometimes they won't get healed anyway - and it's THEIR FAULT (the standard Word of Faith disclaimer when it doesn't work).
That's because God is always faithful to His Word. We're the ones with the problems.
Actually, I would advise you to repent of your judgment about the Word not applying for all believers and submit your uinderstanding to God for some revelation regarding His covenant and how that applies to you for healing. Not that that is enough, you have to appropriate it as well. Since you have already said previously that you have zero faith for healing, then maybe it's time to see about getting some, unless of course, you'd like to rely on medical procedures to be included in your testimony of healing and recovery.
I'm not knocking you personally, but it would give God greater glory for you to be healed and for you to get the revelation about this than the alternative.
I ASSUME (for lack of other explanation) that the Lord intends to MAINTAIN ME in my condition because in HIS WISDOM, it's the best possible state for me (with my personality, and weaknesses) to be in now.
(Sigh)
LIKE Paul's "Thorn" (whatever it was) it was better for Him, AND His ministry to suffer with it than it would have been if it were eliminated. That it wasn't a "Physical condition" is unimportant it was something that bugged the FIRE outta him - that the Lord allowed to remain.
Here's the "messenger" thing coming back into play. I'd hate to see a thorn come and steal something out of God's benefit plan for you life.
Your "veiled threat" at the end is also typical of the "WoF" genre - a "touch not the Lord's anointed" thing, I guess.
I said: It's important not to scoff because the inheritance of the scoffer is not good and allows these types of situations to exist. (You haven't scoffed specifically about this in this post, but I thought that I would entreat you to consider not doing so, particularly in the light of the seriousness, and how God considers you very precious in His sight).
I often warn people when I namedrop or when others do because many are quick to judge and I grow weary of reminding people not to bring judgment on themselves.
(I thought that was as loving as I knew to be, and certainly was not a
threat.) Why would I do that? The debate thing enables us to air out reasonings about various doctrines and compare them to the Word, not their experience, or even other's experiences. We can learn from them, as long as it doesn't contradict the Word.