• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

mark46

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 29, 2010
20,632
5,006
✟987,331.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Here in SC, we can afford to be a local opposition within the TEC. By SC law, and by ruling of the SC Supreme Court, the national TEC can't take over our church property as has happened in other states.

The notion of ACNA being a splinter group will take a few years to deal with. However, I would note that the ACNA is recognized by half the world's Anglicans. In anyc ase, ACNA is not very active in SC because the legal situation. We can continue as conservative Anglicans.

 
Upvote 0

LivingWordUnity

Unchanging Deposit of Faith, Traditional Catholic
May 10, 2007
24,497
11,193
✟220,786.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
I'm with TOMUK. I left Rome because I could no longer agree with Papal infallibility and the "new dogmas", so to speak. Yet that's no reason to become Anglican.
What is in any of the dogma's that wasn't already believed in the early Church?
 
Upvote 0

TomUK

What would Costanza do?
Site Supporter
Feb 8, 2004
9,101
397
41
Lancashire, UK
✟84,645.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Politics
UK-Conservative
What is in any of the dogma's that wasn't already believed in the early Church?

A rather ironic question considering the early church didn't even speak in terms of dogmas.
 
Upvote 0
L

luckyfredsdad

Guest

You have a mistaken idea of the Church my friend! The Church is the Body of Christ! We are made members of Christ and Children of God, through baptism and Instruction in the Faith. We hold to the Catholic Church of the Ages and to Holy Tradition as it has been taught since the beginning! The fact that various groups have abandoned the Revelation of Christ, its recording in Scripture and the Teaching of the Holy Fathers through the Seven Ecumenical Councils, is a tragedy, but it doesn't affect the Body of Christ! Except perhaps to reduce its size. We might regret it and we might have remorse that things have come to this pass. it might make us Good, Bad or indifferent Catholics, yet we who hold to the Church and the ancient teachings remain Catholics.It is surely the Church that makes us Catholics and not we who make the Church. It is our faithfulness to the received teaching that we have to seek and will be what we are judged on. If the Orthodox Church abandons their Anglican brethren this is their business and the judgment will be on them.
Those Anglicans who have abandoned the ancient faith and have added to the Revelation, are no longer Anglicans , but Neo Anglicans.
 
Upvote 0
L

luckyfredsdad

Guest
What is in any of the dogma's that wasn't already believed in the early Church?
We do not need to look too deep, The Papacy is not in Scripture or Tradition!
Infallibility and Papal Jurisdiction are missing from Revelation or Scripture. They are additions to the Deposit of faith!
The Roman Church, as we know it today is not the ancient catholic church of the fathers but an offspring of Trent!
 
Upvote 0

Ave Maria

Ave Maria Gratia Plena
May 31, 2004
41,132
2,030
43
Diocese of Evansville, IN
✟129,899.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican

I'm not trying to debate but I seriously think you should look at this:

Scripture Catholic - THE PRIMACY OF PETER

Scripture Catholic - THE SECOND COMING

Scripture Catholic - THE SECOND COMING

Scripture Catholic - THE SECOND COMING

Scripture Catholic - THE SECOND COMING

God Bless,
Ave Maria (aka Holly)

EDIT TO ADD: I know that some of the links above appear to be the same link but they're actually the same link that just jumps to a particular section on that page so don't think that I copied the exact same link over and over.
 
Upvote 0
L

luckyfredsdad

Guest
Dear Colleague in Christ!

I have not yet read any of your links other than the one regarding, "The Primacy of Peter". I will get back on them, if the owners permit!

I have read this and can find no real proof or even concrete suggestion that the Primacy of Peter any way descends to the Bishop of Rome. Further, I have read the subject for some time and can find no proof that the early Fathers or Councils admitted any Primacy for The papacy.
My research suggests that what primacy the Pope has is in holding the title of Primate of the West. This being given by the Ecumenical Councils is one of place and honour and is to a large extent shared by the Bishop of Constantinople!
What is in any of the dogma's that wasn't already believed in the early Church?

 
Upvote 0

LivingWordUnity

Unchanging Deposit of Faith, Traditional Catholic
May 10, 2007
24,497
11,193
✟220,786.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
I was wondering something. In reference to the Early Church quote below, why did the Eastern Church of the Corinthians have to go to the Bishop of Rome to settle a dispute they had?

“Owing to the sudden and repeated calamities and misfortunes which have befallen us, we must acknowledge that we have been somewhat tardy in turning our attention to the matters in dispute among you, beloved…Accept our counsel, and you will have nothing to regret…If anyone disobey the things which have been said by Him through us, let them know that they will involve themselves in transgression and in no small danger…You will afford us joy and gladness if, being obedient to the things which we have written through the Holy Spirit, you will root out the wicked passion of jealousy.”
St. Clement of Rome, Letter to the Corinthians, 1: 58–59, 63, A.D. 80
 
Upvote 0

TomUK

What would Costanza do?
Site Supporter
Feb 8, 2004
9,101
397
41
Lancashire, UK
✟84,645.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Politics
UK-Conservative

I think you will find the majority of Anglicans recognising the historical significance and primacy of the bishop of Rome. The problems only start appearing when you consider what the papacy has become. I pray every day that the church may one day become, united under the bishop of Rome as the first among equals. However from my perspective the obstacles aren't coming from the Anglican church but the Roman one.
 
Upvote 0
L

luckyfredsdad

Guest
I was wondering something. In reference to the Early Church quote below, why did the Eastern Church of the Corinthians have to go to the Bishop of Rome to settle a dispute they had?l


Was not the Church at Corinth an outgrowth of the Church of Rome? In New Testament times the Church at Corinth in the main being Roman immigrants? Who else should they go to in a time of trouble, but the Bishop of the nearest See the Bishop of the main city of the Western Empire? I wouldn't have thought that Corinth was classed as an eastern Church by the way!
You still have not answered the question of how the privileges of Peter descend on to the shoulders of the Bishop of Rome?

Even if you could answer any of the questions asked, it wouldn't make any real difference, you have to prove the succession of the Bishop of Rome to S.Peter's prerogative. Again there's nothing in Theology or tradition! If your claim above had any basis at all in reality are you saying the papal claims to be ,"God's Vice Regent on Earth,' can be deduced from the Corinthian business!

But there's an interesting query, according to the Orthodox Church the first 7 or 8 popes were Greeks! If the Corintheans were other than Roman immigrants, who else would they contact but a Bishop of their own type!










 
Upvote 0
C

CJtheCatholic

Guest

Pretty interesting if I might say so myself! lol
 
Upvote 0

LivingWordUnity

Unchanging Deposit of Faith, Traditional Catholic
May 10, 2007
24,497
11,193
✟220,786.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
 
Upvote 0
L

luckyfredsdad

Guest
 
Upvote 0

New_Found_Faith

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Feb 4, 2004
5,000
228
✟75,978.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Jumping in late to address the OP. I haven't read any other posts yet so forgive me if I am restating someone else's points or ignoring some ongoing debate, etc.


I was in your position around a year and a half ago. Like many others, I found TEC after I became disenfranchised with the RCC. I too felt the need to remain "Catholic" in the same sense that you do. Regular celebration of the Eucharist and Apostolic Succession were important to me, but I wanted a more socially progressive Church. I found what I was looking for in TEC.

I would warn you, though, that RC's will insist until they are blue in the face that TEC's orders are not valid and that Apostolic Succession does not exist within most Anglican Churches. They do not recognize our Eucharist as being valid.

But, if you feel that God is leading you from the RCC to TEC, what RC's insist shouldn't matter IMO.

The question I had for you guys and gals, especially if you are Anglican/Episcopalian, is this: what makes you not accept the authority of Rome?

Historically, I don't see any basis for it. If you are familiar with Church history the Popes and Church leadership have been some of the most corrupt officials in World History. The common, nonreligious man demonstrates a higher sense of morality than what the RCC's leadership has demonstrated in centuries and decades past. The Papacy throughout history has been bought and sold and at times has served as little more than a political office.

Aside from that, I don't find a biblical basis for Papal leadership. I personally deem many modern edicts and policies of the Church logically unsound and far from infalliable.

Do you consider yourself to be Catholic, just not ROMAN Catholic (well, of course you don't consider yourself RC or else you would be lol)?

Kind of. I'm not big on labels. I observe the Catholic sacraments (generally excluding reconciliation). I'm not big on marian devotion or prayers to saints, although it doesn't bother me. I still may pray the rosary on occasion, partially out of habit. I consider myself Episcopalian, but certainly identify more with the "Catholic" label than the "Protestant" one.

What do you personally believe makes the Church Catholic anyway? Is it communion with Rome or belief in the deposit of faith handed down through tradition and apostolic succession?

I personally view Catholicism as having more to do with the ancient rituals, scriptures and traditions of the faith rather than having to do with any particular organization based in Rome or elsewhere. This is probably why I identify more closely with the Catholic label than the Protestant one. The rituals and traditions that I practice/observe as an Episcopalian are decidedly more Catholic than Protestant IMO.

Thanks, and God bless all! Oh, and pray for me to recieve wisom (James 1:5-6)!

 
Upvote 0
C

CJtheCatholic

Guest

Thanks for the post! It's nice to hear from other converts, or people who left the RCC, in this particular case. I'm still on the search so I look forward to more people's replies here.
 
Upvote 0