Sorry, but I am getting the notion that you cannot read and comprehend.
I see. You're a comedian?
ONLY if you are stuck with the false assumption that our Universe is the only one. In the end, you will see how utterly foolish is such a claim. God Bless you
Firstly, I have done no such assuming regarding the number of any Universes except to say I don't know of any others - Secondly, your claim from the outset began as "The Bible, and Genesis in particular is 100% in agreement with Science", was it not?
The simple fact that more Christians than not, read something entirely different to you in the writings of Genesis is already reason enough for your claim to fail. This is all that's required for it to be disproven. I went a step further to show you the myriad of ways that your claim was still wrong, even if we held to your faulty assertion that you are the arbiter of the one and only correct interpretation of these writings. Since pointing out all these discrepancies and all the various translations and reinterpretations that have to go on to fit your view into Science, your claim morphed into any number of hideously contorted excuses to bridge that gaffing great gap. It either 100% agrees with Science, or it doesn't. The evidence shows it amply doesn't. Let me list the ways:
- Science does not agree that Earth existed before stars existed.
- Science does not agree that water existed before stars existed.
- Science has no "firmament or alternate universe extricating into this universe" proposition, so this proposition doesn't agree with science.
- Science has not confirmed the existence of grass before Dinosaurs existed. Even if you are right and Science is ignorant of some firmament or alternative universe extricating into this universe that did have grass before Dinosaurs, the fact remains that Science still has not confirmed the existence of grass before Dinosaurs, so this still fails.
- Science shows Humans having evolved over time from an ape ancestor shared with Chimpanzees, Bonobos, and other great apes, with emergent intelligence resulting from our evolution. Science does NOT show any evidence of an introduced "Human Race" from another universe/firmament.
- Science shows no evidence of Intelligent Humans existing for billions of years before this Universe began. Instead, it shows Humans are an emergent species of Ape that have come about in the last couple of hundred thousand years or so.
- Science shows Whales coming from Land Mammals and did not exist before land animals existed.
- Science shows Birds also coming from Land animals, so they too couldn't have existed before land animals existed.
This is as direct an addressal as possible for some (not all) of your Bible claims as measured against Scientific propositions. As for your "reinterpretations" of the KJV Bible to fit Science, these aren't the solution you think they are, and in some cases, you make things worse with your reinterpretations, especially when you insist your God wrote it directly. I want to address a couple more points on your reinterpretations, namely your insistence that Genesis 1:21 starts by creating all life from a single life form and I don't think you're correct. Apart from most other Christians whose Bible study on this reveals a different meaning to yours, a plain reading also indicates something different to you. I'll start at Genesis 1:20 to explain the point.
Genesis 1:20 - And God said, Let the waters bring forth abundantly the moving creature that hath life, and fowl that may fly above the earth in the open firmament of heaven.
Many bible studies on this verse indicate an open defiance to the established science of Evolution with the Creation narrative of individually created kinds - again in stark contrast to the contortions of your views to make it fit the Science. I also want to refer you to the Hebrew translations from which the KJV was derivd (
http://www.scripture4all.org/OnlineInterlinear/OTpdf/gen1.pdf ), and it says:
First part is: "
| and-he-is-saying Elohim | they-shall-roam the-waters |" - which I don't believe means that God is roaming the waters, as it goes on: "|
and-flyer he-shall-fly over the-earth|" - which again doesn't point to Jesus flying, but the winged fowls doing that flying. Genesis 1:210 then goes on to affirm what then happens:
First part is: "|
and-he-is-creating Elohim | the-monsters the-great-ones and | every-of soul the-living the-moving which they-roam the-waters to-species-of-them |" which says nothing of this nonsense idea of yours that it speaks of the ancestor of all life coming from the water, but that water-bound life is being created according to their species, and not to God's/Trinity's kind..... whatever that means.... it then goes on: "|
every-of flyer-of wing to-species-of-him | and-he-is-seeing Elohim that good |" which essentially speaks of
all the winged fowl species being specially created, and God saw that it was good.
This is backed up with the Hebrew translation of Genesis 1:24-25 repeating a similar narrative for LAND BASED ANIMALS! as such:
In this case, it seems the Hebrew translates the Earth gender as 'She' or 'Her', which only fortifies the case against your dysfunctional reinterpretation of these verses on review. It again starts out with his 'making of', followed by the narrative (water/air/ or in this case, land) animals being individually and specially created according to their species, then God seeing that it was all Good. Sorry to break it to you, but your modern day reinterpretation of the 400 year old medieval english translation of the 3,000 year old Hebrew writing, doesn't make sense.
Also, you never did properly clarify what your version of "his kind" and "their kind" actually means. It obviously isn't a physical likeness and you seem to indicate some life forms were immortal, and others temporary, or something? Where is this explained in the Bible? How is something non-human immortal, and why the need for it to be immortal anyway? Is livestock required in Heaven?