- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,855,726
- 52,531
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Since it [Intelligent Design] came from the Devil, I suspect it's going to be around for awhile.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Since it [Intelligent Design] came from the Devil, I suspect it's going to be around for awhile.I think you meant to say phrase, but I rather hope it is just a phase, one that will pass in time.
What has any of that to do with the truth of God's word?
Genesis 1 is a direct challenge by God against all other myths, legends, beliefs, and false sciences.
That’s not evidence for your claim, that’s evidence there are more people like you. Seems to me you all just need something to help you sleep at night.Then wait until Christmas [holidays] and go to church [edifices] and sing Christmas carols [songs] before you read the Christmas story [literature], if it's empirical evidence you want.
That’s some standard cult brainwashing if I’ve ever seen it. Circular reasoning is vain.I are with orders from headquarters not to listen to vain denials and to give answers of the hope that is within me primarily from the word of God.
Yup.Men wrote the Bible, and all we have are copies of copies of copies of fragments.
Even we creationists are susceptible to doing the Devil's work; as I've demonstrated before with Nimrod.ID came from creationists. I’ve already corrected you once, chief.
Creationism + Science = Intelligent DesignHitchSlap said:Creationism > cdesign proponentsists > ID
Tares among the wheat.HitchSlap said:Creationism in a cheap tuxedo.
Then maybe you should get out more often and look around.That’s some standard cult brainwashing if I’ve ever seen it.
Kinda like science validating science, isn't it?gaara said:Circular reasoning is vain.
Of course God didn't use science to create the universe; rather, he created the universe capable of being understood via science. And he created the laws of nature, the laws of physics, which guide and control the universe.God did not create the universe with science.
Yes, phrase. Thank you.I think you meant to say phrase, but I rather hope it is just a phase, one that will pass in time.
Speaking of that, when did He create the law of conservation of mass/energy?And he created the laws of nature, the laws of physics, which guide and control the universe.
Phase/phrase ... if it's Intelligent Design, it's wrong.Yes, phrase. Thank you.
I doubt you are persuading atheists to become Christians by insisting on creationism. Using my approach has, I think, a better chance of success.We can sow seeds though, can't we?
No, it's not called entropy. Stop with the 'fake news,' it makes you look dishonest.Yup.
That's called "entropy".
But if you think the entropy of the Bible* is greater than zero, then that's called "science".
* H[bible]=Ø
When he created the universe that operated with this law.Speaking of that, when did He create the law of conservation of mass/energy?
We are still in day 7.I say it was when He rested on the seventh day. What say you?
When he created the universe that operated with this law.When did He create the second law of thermodynamics?
Nonsense. These kinds of events at the fall would result in the need for rapid evolution after the fall as saber-toothed tigers suddenly grew teeth and became carnivores (for example).I say it came as a result of the Fall. What say you?
Intelligent design is correct. Random mutations are inadequate to explain the various lifeforms. The random events of evolution are actually guided, but without violating the laws of quantum mechanics.if it's Intelligent Design, it's wrong.
I wish you all the success in the world.I doubt you are persuading atheists to become Christians by insisting on creationism. Using my approach has, I think, a better chance of success.
Yes, actually, it is.No, it's not called entropy.
All available evidence would say otherwise.Yes, actually, it is.
Shannon Entropy, to be exact.
While the parchment may crumble away, the message gets transmitted without error to another source.
The Bible is not a product of Arab phoning.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?