• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Why no evidence FOR creation/ID?

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sort by date Sort by votes

KWCrazy

Newbie
Apr 13, 2009
7,229
1,993
Bowling Green, KY
✟90,577.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Evolution believers:

Please show the scientifically valid explanation for the origination of the universe.
1. You do not get to presuppose the existence of another universe which exists only in your fantasies.
2. You can cite Quantum theory ONLY if you can validate a suspension of the effects of gravity and explain where the subatomic particles originated.

I'm sure you will ALL agree on this single scientifically proven process by which the universe began. After all, there could be no life without the building blocks of life, which had to come from minerals and chemicals in the environment.
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,142
Visit site
✟98,015.00
Faith
Agnostic
KWCrazy said:
Evolution believers:

Please show the scientifically valid explanation for the origination of the universe.
Click to expand...


That's like asking people who accept the Germ Theory of Disease to prove the origin of the Universe. We don't need to know the origin of the universe in order to understand how life evolved.
 
Reactions: tyke and Motherofkittens
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,281
8,501
Milwaukee
✟411,038.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
lesliedellow said:
In the end; creationism is the religion of the intellectually dead.
Click to expand...

The evidence is against you:

SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES ESTABLISHED
BY CREATIONIST SCIENTISTS

DISCIPLINE / SCIENTIST
ANTISEPTIC SURGERY JOSEPH LISTER (1827-1912)
BACTERIOLOGY LOUIS PASTEUR (1822-1895)
CALCULUS ISAAC NEWTON (1642-1727)
CELESTIAL MECHANICS JOHANN KEPLER (1571-1630)
CHEMISTRY ROBERT BOYLE (1627-1691)
COMPARATIVE ANATOMY GEORGES CUVIER (1769-1832)
COMPUTER SCIENCE CHARLES BABBAGE (1792-1871)
DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS LORD RAYLEIGH (1842-1919)
DYNAMICS ISAAC NEWTON (1642-1727)
ELECTRONICS JOHN AMBROSE FLEMING (1849-1945)
ELECTRODYNAMICS JAMES CLERK MAXWELL (1831-1879)
ELECTRO-MAGNETICS MICHAEL FARADAY (1791-1867)
ENERGETICS LORD KELVIN (1824-1907)
ENTOMOLOGY OF LIVING INSECTS HENRI FABRE (1823-1915)
FIELD THEORY MICHAEL FARADAY (1791-1867)
FLUID MECHANICS GEORGE STOKES (1819-1903)
GALACTIC ASTRONOMY WILLIAM HERSCHEL (1738-1822)
GAS DYNAMICS ROBERT BOYLE (1627-1691)
GENETICS GREGOR MENDEL (1822-1884)
GLACIAL GEOLOGY LOUIS AGASSIZ (1807-1873)
GYNECOLOGY JAMES SIMPSON (1811-1870)
HYDRAULICS LEONARDO DA VINCI (1452-1519)
HYDROGRAPHY MATTHEW MAURY (1806-1873)
HYDROSTATICS BLAISE PASCAL (1623-1662)
ICHTHYOLOGY LOUIS AGASSIZ (1807-1873)
ISOTOPIC CHEMISTRY WILLIAM RAMSAY (1852-1916)
MODEL ANALYSIS LORD RAYLEIGH (1842-1919)
NATURAL HISTORY JOHN RAY (1627-1705)
NON-EUCLIDEAN GEOMETRY BERNHARD RIEMANN (1826- 1866)
OCEANOGRAPHY MATTHEW MAURY (1806-1873)
OPTICAL MINERALOGY DAVID BREWSTER (1781-1868)
PALEONTOLOGY JOHN WOODWARD (1665-1728)
PATHOLOGY RUDOLPH VIRCHOW (1821-1902)
PHYSICAL ASTRONOMY JOHANN KEPLER (1571-1630)
REVERSIBLE THERMODYNAMICS JAMES JOULE (1818-1889)
STATISTICAL THERMODYNAMICS JAMES CLERK MAXWELL (1831-1879)
STRATIGRAPHY NICHOLAS STENO (1631-1686)
SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY CAROLUS LINNAEUS (1707-1778)
THERMODYNAMICS LORD KELVIN (1824-1907)
THERMOKINETICS HUMPHREY DAVY (1778-1829)
VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY GEORGES CUVIER (1769-1832)

I suggest you check the education and training of any of these
before you claim that they are notable in that they ignored
their creationist training. Yes, there is another current list.
 
Reactions: Bugeyedcreepy and AV1611VET
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,281
8,501
Milwaukee
✟411,038.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Upvote 0
W

Waggles

Acts 2:38
Site Supporter
Feb 7, 2017
768
475
70
South Oz
Visit site
✟134,744.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Widowed
In the very end of all things, human philosophies and false sciences shall be revealed for the lies
that they are - for the Truth himself shall appear and return to judge both the living and the dead.
Yes folks, Jesus the Christ, the Creator of this wonderful living planet and the Universe shall
return and every eye shall behold him.

What will you do then? What will you believe then? Will Darwin save you?
The scriptures have already prophecied your calamity and responses...

12 And I beheld when he had opened the sixth seal, and, lo, there was a great earthquake;
and the sun became black as sackcloth of hair, and the moon became as blood;
13 And the stars of heaven fell unto the earth, even as a fig tree casts her untimely figs,
when she is shaken of a mighty wind.
14 And the heaven departed as a scroll when it is rolled together; and every mountain and island
were moved out of their places.
15 And the kings of the earth, and the great men, and the rich men, and the chief captains, and the mighty men, and every bondman, and every free man, hid themselves in the dens and in the rocks
of the mountains;
16 And said to the mountains and rocks, Fall on us, and hide us from the face of him that sits on the throne, and from the wrath of the Lamb:
17 For the great day of his wrath is come; and who shall be able to stand?
Revelation 6:12-17

Bring a change of underwear!
 
Upvote 0

sfs

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2003
10,813
7,828
65
Massachusetts
✟390,708.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Waggles said:
What will you do then? What will you believe then? Will Darwin save you?
The scriptures have already prophecied your calamity and responses...
Click to expand...
Who are you addressing? And what does this have to do with evolution? Do you really think God is going to be quizzing us on which scientific theories we rejected?
 
Reactions: Motherofkittens
Upvote 0

sfs

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2003
10,813
7,828
65
Massachusetts
✟390,708.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
SkyWriting said:
So you are opposed to intellectualism?
Click to expand...
No. I was pointing out that creationism has no role in modern science. I'm not sure how that translates into opposition to intellectualism, or even what the latter is.
 
Reactions: Motherofkittens
Upvote 0

lesliedellow

Member
Sep 20, 2010
9,654
2,582
United Kingdom
Visit site
✟119,577.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats

People living before the Theory of Evolution had been demonstrated true beyond all reasonable doubt had no reason not to believe that Genesis 1-10 could not simply be read as uncomplicated history. Somebody wanting to believe the same thing today, however, has to indulge in every type of obscurantism, fallacy, misrepresentation and mental gymnastics imaginable.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: Motherofkittens
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,281
8,501
Milwaukee
✟411,038.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

The Genesis account describes how the world was formed
including a Garden where God walked and talked with Adam.
The Gen account is about the creation of Paradise where God walked.
It's not about the realm where we currently live. Adam was
banished from Paradise.

It is normal for people to confuse the two. Some also complain
about our current realm, for the exact same reason.
 
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,281
8,501
Milwaukee
✟411,038.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
sfs said:
No. I was pointing out that creationism has no role in modern science. I'm not sure how that translates into opposition to intellectualism, or even what the latter is.
Click to expand...

Lack of intellectualism in Creationists was the post I was responding to.
Your complaint has no bearing on that.
 
Upvote 0

USincognito

a post by Alan Smithee
Site Supporter
Dec 25, 2003
42,070
16,820
Dallas
✟918,891.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
KWCrazy said:
Evolution believers:...

...After all, there could be no life without the building blocks of life, which had to come from minerals and chemicals in the environment.
Click to expand...

One does not believe something for which one has evidence.

And actually God creating the first primordial life would preclude that issue.
 
Reactions: Motherofkittens and tyke
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Ex-skeptic discovers evidence for Jesus, NDE encounters
Replies
4
Views
318
General Theology
Fervent
Message for the 10th World Day of Prayer for the Care of Creation (July 2, 2025)...
Replies
1
Views
166
One Bread, One Body - Catholic
Michie
The Groaning of Creation: Romans 8
Replies
0
Views
442
Whosoever Will, May Come - Liberal
FireDragon76
Prayers for my weight loss and limited mobility
Replies
7
Views
828
Prayer Wall
Neostarwcc
B
How is it that the Catholic Church is evil?
Replies
290
Views
13K
Denomination Specific Theology
concretecamper
Menu
Log in
Register