Taken together, genomic data for both the alleged fusion and cryptic centromere sites refute the concept of fusion in a human-chimpanzee common ancestor.
How so?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Taken together, genomic data for both the alleged fusion and cryptic centromere sites refute the concept of fusion in a human-chimpanzee common ancestor.
When it comes to Darwinism, likewise!!I do not believe any of that.
Your feelings and assertions and anecdotes do not impress me
In the end; evolution is the religion of the spiritually dead.
I've got a religion, and evolution isn't it. Evolution is, however, an indispensable model for understanding and predicting genetic data. If you have an alternative model that can do as well, I'm all ears.In the end; evolution is the religion of the spiritually dead.
Any supernatural power is a non repeatable event
and by definition outside of the realms of science.
No one claims it did. Readers all through time claim it is fiction.
That is only one factor. It really depends on the reputation of the person
making the determination. Some people have a clear agenda when evaluating.
It's impossible for Creationists to predict the creationist model
not knowing the conditions before and during.
You must know the conditions previous, and during an event
to make predictions.
Becasue it was a mature creation, ready for it's intended purpose.
As God always does.
If I'm not mistaken wouldn't a good argument or evidence against evolution point to creationism?
What other option would there be? Is there a third party?
Its either creationism or evolution, right?
If creationism is outside the realms of our science then science can neither prove or disprove it.
therefor to make an argument for creationism would be to argue against evolution because evolution is in the realms of science.
The fact that you're asking this shows it.How do you know?
That's the thing about unfalsifiable ideas.... they are infinite in number. Which is exactly why they are worthless.
Never said i was the author and the source was cited earlier and repeated on the same page. #192. If i reference an article, {From the previous link.} i am not always going to keep posting the same link over and over. Esp when the link is available on the same page. It is not my problem you guys cannot make a case for your faith. You don't know how.
Debunking the Debunkers | Answers in Genesis
In 2013, it was shown that the alleged interstitial telomeric repeat site of the human chromosome 2 fusion corresponding to chimpanzee chromosomes 2A and 2B of a hypothetical common ancestor was actually a second promoter in the DDX11L2 long noncoding RNA gene. Additional ENCODE related data are provided in this report that not only debunk evolutionary criticism and obfuscation in response to this discovery, but solidify the original finding. New data come from epigenetic-modifications, transcription factor binding, and transcription start site information. It is also shown that the alleged cryptic centromere site, which is very short in length compared to a normal centromere, is completely situated inside the actively expressed protein coding gene ANKRD30BL—encoding both exon and intron regions. Other factors refuting this region as a cryptic centromere are also discussed. Taken together, genomic data for both the alleged fusion and cryptic centromere sites refute the concept of fusion in a human-chimpanzee common ancestor.
---------------------------------------------------------
For whom is plate tectonics the religion?In the end; evolution is the religion of the spiritually dead.
A third problem with the hypothesis of a chromosomal fusion in human ancestry lies in the complete absence of humans with 48 chromosomes. If it were true that a chromosomal split occurred in human evolution, then two distinct human groups would have been generated: one containing 48 chromosomes which were not altered by any genetic change, and a second containing 46 chromosomes including the fusion of chromosome 2
Always with the excuses.
Nothing has changed since the Piltdown Man Hoax ... it still continues with another fraud 'Lucy'