Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
who said we have no evidence for a young earth? for instance: (from my other thread) we have empirical evidence that speciation may take about less then 100 years:The conclusion of a YEC Universe is laughably horribly wrong . There’s no evidence for it . There’s also evidence against it and if the only evidence you have is an old book that had been demonstrably and spectacularly wrong before( Galileo) well , the only thing I can say is that you need better evidence than that
Wow, so on top of all of your other crazy beliefs, you think speciation events just happen continually, one after another...who said we have no evidence for a young earth? for instance: (from my other thread) we have empirical evidence that speciation may take about less then 100 years:
Rapid Evolution Changes Species in Real Time | DiscoverMagazine.com
Watching new species evolve in real time
so lets assume a tipical speciation event= 100 years.
one of the largest family on earth is the curculionidae which contain almost 100,000 species. so if we start with 2 species then after about one generation of a speciation event (100 years) we will get 4 different species. and after another generation of speciation we will get 8 and so on. so we only need about less then 20 generation of speciation to get more then 100,000 different species (2^20) . or about 2000 years.
we also have evidence for a suppose 15-20 my old DNA. when science show us that a DNA cant survive so long time.
So prove it.What good is it to provide good sound arguments when the conclusions are always ignored out of hand? Anyway, here are two:
Argument #1 for young earth creationism: The Bible is provably the inerrant word of God.
If it is unambiguous, why do only a minority of Christians and other people of the book believe it?The Bible clearly and unambiguously teaches young earth creationism.
This argument is based on failed logic. Falsifying the theory of evolution does not prove creationism of any kind, YE or otherwise. It only disproves the theory of evolution.Argument #2 for young earth creationism:
It looks like you are finally outed. You're a YEC. You are not really arguing for the existence of God or a "designer," you are pushing a shallow and theologically inadequate interpretation of the Bible, just like all the other creationists.who said we have no evidence for a young earth? for instance: (from my other thread) we have empirical evidence that speciation may take about less then 100 years:
Rapid Evolution Changes Species in Real Time | DiscoverMagazine.com
Watching new species evolve in real time
so lets assume a tipical speciation event= 100 years.
one of the largest family on earth is the curculionidae which contain almost 100,000 species. so if we start with 2 species then after about one generation of a speciation event (100 years) we will get 4 different species. and after another generation of speciation we will get 8 and so on. so we only need about less then 20 generation of speciation to get more then 100,000 different species (2^20) . or about 2000 years.
we also have evidence for a suppose 15-20 my old DNA. when science show us that a DNA cant survive so long time.
Sorry, that argument died when all the clergy opposed the rotation of the earth as the cause of day and night, asserting scripture proved the earth does not move.What good is it to provide good sound arguments when the conclusions are always ignored out of hand? Anyway, here are two:
Argument #1 for young earth creationism (notice the word "evolution" doesn't appear):
- The Bible is provably the inerrant word of God.
- The Bible clearly and unambiguously teaches young earth creationism.
- Therefore, young earth creationism is true.
Sorry, the argument from inability of evolutionists to say otherwise is clearly false. They do say otherwise.Argument #2 for young earth creationism:
- Evolution claims via long time periods with its mutations and gene copying errors.
- I am yet to find any evidence that the long time periods are sufficient for such complex biological systems to evolve. The probability of such a thing occurring is zero and evolutionists can't say otherwise.
im not a YEC, i just dont know what is the real age of the earth. i have no problem with a young earth or an old earth and i think that we have evidence for both claims.It looks like you are finally outed. You're a YEC. You are not really arguing for the existence of God or a "designer," you are pushing a shallow and theologically inadequate interpretation of the Bible, just like all the other creationists.
im not a YEC, i just dont know what is the real age of the earth.
i have no problem with a young earth
or an old earth and i think that we have evidence for both claims.
im not a YEC, i just dont know what is the real age of the earth. i have no problem with a young earth or an old earth and i think that we have evidence for both claims.
My point still stands. I put it to you that you are a fraud. Your anti-evolutionary arguments are not motivated by a love of pure science as you would like to have us believe, but because of your interpretation of the Bible.im not a YEC, i just dont know what is the real age of the earth. i have no problem with a young earth or an old earth and i think that we have evidence for both claims.
But robot penguins negate the need for a creator!speciation actually has an average rate. so why not?
So prove it.
Marriage is just a piece of paper. It means nothing. What matters is how you treat one another, how you behave.
People who say things like you just said, don't know what love actually is, imo.
I'm curious but what evidences are there for an Old Earth? Besides a couple of scientists who say that the Earth is billions of years old But, they can't quite prove it. Yet, people go around stating that it's fact. It's not, a fact is something 100% proven by science. Just like the theory of Evolution scientists say that they can't prove it. In fact, It's been proven by science recently that we were not evolved from apes and Evolutionary scientists currently do not know what we evolved from. It's just a theory.
Just like there is no 100% way to prove that Creationism is true there is no way to prove that Evolution is true either. Both are theories as to what the beginning of life could possibly be. Obviously as a Christian I believe in Creationism but I do admit that it has no way of being 100% proven. A lot of a Christians belief is about faith. We believe it to be fact because the Bible says so and the Bible hasn't been wrong yet.
And yet some people - no names, no pack drill - seems to be in eternal darkness.But, but...... ah, never mind, it’s Saturday and the sun is shining.
Obviously as a Christian I believe in Creationism but I do admit that it has no way of being 100% proven
realy? are you saying that we have no scientific evidence for a young earth?My point still stands. I put it to you that you are a fraud. Your anti-evolutionary arguments are not motivated by a love of pure science as you would like to have us believe, but because of your interpretation of the Bible.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?