• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Why Is This A Problem???

Tone

"Whenever Thou humblest me, Thou makest me great."
Site Supporter
Dec 24, 2018
15,126
6,875
California
✟61,200.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Private
Because those are the facts of the situation. If those facts dont matter to you, well ok. But I think they should matter.

Its right to steer danger toward the least populated area you can.

Where is the moral basis for this?
 
Upvote 0

setst777

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 25, 2018
2,440
649
67
Greenfield
Visit site
✟450,461.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
The hypothetical, which is not mine, says the one person will die if you pull the lever. Tie him up too if it helps set the scene.

Pls see #27 for my take on probing the hypothetical head on.

If that be the case, then I take the view that, the needs of the many outweigh the needs of a few. A Vulcan saying as recorded in Star Trek.
 
Upvote 0

Tone

"Whenever Thou humblest me, Thou makest me great."
Site Supporter
Dec 24, 2018
15,126
6,875
California
✟61,200.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Private
For me, its that human people have value.

Whats the moral basis for doing nothing?

Yours seems to be that human people have numerical (mathematical) value.

If you don't pull the lever that's not doing nothing. That's not intentionally doing something that kills someone.
 
Upvote 0

Occams Barber

Newbie
Site Supporter
Aug 8, 2012
6,493
7,692
76
Northern NSW
✟1,075,328.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Divorced
I dont think the difficult balance between valuing the life of a beloved vs valuing their freedom from suffering maps onto the trolley problem, which can be summarized with no loss of meaning as: is it OK to steer danger toward less populated areas? There's really nothing else to draw out of the problem presented as its given to us above.

I think hard conflicts of values would require a different hypothetical to explore, or some very significant elaboration on the one I read. The problem you graciously offered from your own experience seems much more difficult, for individuals involved, and for the law.

Looks like I disagree with both you and @2PhiloVoid. I think that, while the specifics may vary, the underlying ethical problem is the same.

However, I'm happy to leave this as it stands.

OB
 
  • Like
Reactions: durangodawood
Upvote 0

durangodawood

re Member
Aug 28, 2007
27,068
18,799
Colorado
✟518,738.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
If that be the case, then I take the view that, the needs of the many outweigh the needs of a few. A Vulcan saying as recorded in Star Trek.
I think thats correct.... but very incomplete as a guide to human action. Its enough for the trolley problem. But not enough for, say, designing a government.
 
Upvote 0

setst777

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 25, 2018
2,440
649
67
Greenfield
Visit site
✟450,461.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I have a tendency to think ahead and I thought the point of the exercise was to evaluate the consequences of my actions. In a real life situation I wouldn’t touch the lever because I don’t know where the other track goes and as soon as I touch that lever I put myself responsible for anything that would happen afterwards. There’s no indication that said runaway trolly is going to stop so I could be making myself responsible for God knows what if I intervene. So my choice would be not to get involved because I don’t know what I’m doing. I could be causing a head on collision with another train killing even more people.

Could it be that God put you in that very position to make a difference in the outcome?
 
Upvote 0

setst777

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 25, 2018
2,440
649
67
Greenfield
Visit site
✟450,461.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I think thats correct.... but very incomplete as a guide to human action. Its enough for the trolley problem. But not enough for, say, designing a government.

The trolley is all that is important in this analogy.
 
Upvote 0

durangodawood

re Member
Aug 28, 2007
27,068
18,799
Colorado
✟518,738.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
Yours seems to be that human people have numerical (mathematical) value.

If you don't pull the lever that's not doing nothing. That's not intentionally doing something that kills someone.
Yes. All other things being equal, its better to let few perish rather than many. I dont even see how this could be controversial.

And no ones killing anyone either way. Its a runaway trolley in both cases!
 
Upvote 0

Occams Barber

Newbie
Site Supporter
Aug 8, 2012
6,493
7,692
76
Northern NSW
✟1,075,328.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Divorced
If that be the case, then I take the view that, the needs of the many outweigh the needs of a few. A Vulcan saying as recorded in Star Trek.


While what you're saying makes sense at some level it is a dangerous basis on which to frame a government. It can lead to the oppression of minorities.

In the case of the trolley I would throw the lever and cause the death of the individual. The trolley problem is too limited to create the problem of an oppressed minority.

OB
 
Upvote 0

setst777

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 25, 2018
2,440
649
67
Greenfield
Visit site
✟450,461.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
While what you're saying makes sense at some level it is a dangerous basis on which to frame a government. It can lead to the oppression of minorities.

In the case of the trolley I would throw the lever and cause the death of the individual. The trolley problem is too limited to create the problem of an oppressed minority.

OB

The trolley analogy is not discussing governments, which are far more complex, and many choices are available. The choices of the Trolley analogy are extremely limited to only two choices.
 
Upvote 0

Tone

"Whenever Thou humblest me, Thou makest me great."
Site Supporter
Dec 24, 2018
15,126
6,875
California
✟61,200.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Private
Yes. All other things being equal, its better to let few perish rather than many. I dont even see how this could be controversial.

And no ones killing anyone either way. Its a runaway trolley in both cases!


You would be intentionally pulling a lever, knowing that your action will cause someone to be killed.

How's that different than pulling a trigger knowing the shot will kill someone?
 
Upvote 0

durangodawood

re Member
Aug 28, 2007
27,068
18,799
Colorado
✟518,738.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
You would be intentionally pulling a lever, knowing that your action will cause someone to be killed.

How's that different than pulling a trigger knowing the shot will kill someone?
The trigger here was already pulled. There's already a runaway trolley. Thats the bullet in this scenario.

All youre asked to do is deflect it toward where there's less people.
 
Upvote 0

Tone

"Whenever Thou humblest me, Thou makest me great."
Site Supporter
Dec 24, 2018
15,126
6,875
California
✟61,200.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Private
The trigger here was already pulled. There's already a runaway trolley. Thats the bullet in this scenario.

The trigger wasn't pulled for the one person. You're doing that.
 
Upvote 0

durangodawood

re Member
Aug 28, 2007
27,068
18,799
Colorado
✟518,738.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
The trigger wasn't pulled for the one person. You're doing that.
Yes, you have the power to deflect the danger to where it will harm fewer people.

But dont take on the burden being the initiator of the deadly peril, which is what a trigger finger comparison does.
 
Upvote 0

Bradskii

Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Aug 19, 2018
22,803
15,442
72
Bondi
✟362,689.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
The trigger here was already pulled. There's already a runaway trolley. Thats the bullet in this scenario.

All youre asked to do is deflect it toward where there's less people.

These problems drive me up the wall. Not because they're tricky to answer. It's because you have to spend half your time explaining the concept of hypotheticals to so many people (No, you can't derail the trolley/ring for assistance/put up a fence to stop people getting on the track etc).

But they are interesting in how we approach the same result under slightly different conditions. Most people would pull the lever. But if you had to physically push someone in front of the trolley to derail it, and killing him in the process, thus saving five, most people wouldn't.

And if we change it to pulling a lever which will authorise someone being killed to use their various organs to transplant into five people who would otherwise die, then no-one pulls it. Even though the result is the same: one dead, five live.
 
Upvote 0

setst777

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 25, 2018
2,440
649
67
Greenfield
Visit site
✟450,461.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
You would be intentionally pulling a lever, knowing that your action will cause someone to be killed.

How's that different than pulling a trigger knowing the shot will kill someone?

You would also be intentionally not pulling the lever, since you had the will and ability to do either. By being in the right place at the right time, you have the opportunity to make a difference in the outcome, or not.
 
Upvote 0

Tone

"Whenever Thou humblest me, Thou makest me great."
Site Supporter
Dec 24, 2018
15,126
6,875
California
✟61,200.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Private
You would also be intentionally not pulling the lever, since you had the will and ability to do either. By being in the right place at the right time, you have the opportunity to make a difference in the outcome, or not.

So if you don't pull the lever are you intentionally doing something that you know will kill someone?
 
Upvote 0