• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Why is the day of worship controversial?

LoveGodsWord

Well-Known Member
Jun 5, 2017
22,242
6,636
Queensland
Visit site
✟252,349.00
Country
Australia
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
It also says there is no Jew in Jesus Christ.

Actually it says there are no JEWS and GENTILES all are one in CHRIST. No separation any longer between Jews and gentiles.

So you have a colossal failure here.

Not at all God's WORD is true and I believe and follow it. The only failure is in not believing and following God's WORD.

This is personal opinion unsupportable by your passage. Nothing about being or becoming Israel. Coming up short again offering personal unsupportable opinion. What can I say?

Not at all it is God's WORD not mine and there is a lot of it that disagrees with you.

1. ORIGIN OF ISRAEL AND THE 12 TRIBES linked
2. MEANING OF THE NAME OF GOD'S ISRAEL linked
3. GOD'S ISRAEL IN THE NEW COVENANT IS GOD'S CHURCH linked
4. GENTILES ARE NOW GRAFTED IN WITH GOD'S ISRAEL linked

Yep a lot of scripture that disagrees with you brother. Please feel free to address all the scriptures in the linked post. If you cannot then your argument is simply your wod over God's Word. Who should we believe, you or God? I know who I believe *ROMANS 3:4; ACTS 5:29.

This passage doesn't make Jews out of gentiles.

Best to let God's WORD that you are arguing against do the talking here...

ROMANS 2:28-29 [28], FOR HE IS NOT A JEW WHICH IS ONE OUTWARDLY; NEITHER IS THAT CIRCUMCISION, WHICH IS OUTWARDS IN THE FLESH: [29], BUT HE IS A JEW WHICH IS ONE INWARDLY; and CIRCUMCISION IS OF THE HEART, IN THE SPIRIT, AND NOT IN THE LETTER; whose praise is not of men, but of God.

Yes I read your posts prior to your linking them anywhere. Two words of Scripture text "among them" defeat all of those posts.

Not at all brother who is the them in ROMANS 11:17 where it says that the gentiles are grafted in among them? Yep you guessed it ISRAEL

Hope this helps
 
Upvote 0

ace of hearts

Well-Known Member
Nov 15, 2018
3,507
1,149
west coast
✟39,128.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Yep you guessed it. This is the promise made to ISRAEL (Jacob)
Nope this promise isn't made with Jacob. The fulfillment of this blessing does however pass through him.
You have no part in God's promise if you are not a part of God's ISRAEL as the promise was made to Abraham and his seed who is ISRAEL *HEBREWS 8:10-12.
I don't care how many times you abuse or misuse this passage. It will never make your intention true.
INDEED! JESUS represents the ROOT in ROMANS 11:13-27. Gentiles are now grafted into the ROOT (JESUS) among God's ISRAEL (the branches).
OK, I can buy that. This is a change for you from into Israel to among Israel. Quite a difference. However that doesn't mean the one fold is Israel. We're fellowcitizens with the saints, not Israel. Eph 2:19
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

ace of hearts

Well-Known Member
Nov 15, 2018
3,507
1,149
west coast
✟39,128.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Actually it says there are no JEWS and GENTILES all are one in CHRIST. No separation any longer between Jews and gentiles.
Considering your position please explain how you have Israel without Jews. You wrongly promote Christians are Israel. You do this by misapplication of words and interchanging them (changing the definition).
Not at all God's WORD is true and I believe and follow it. The only failure is in not believing and following God's WORD.
Any pertinent comment here would only lead to trouble. I've no interest in the origin of Israel.
I've no interest in your definition of Israel.
I've no interest in your misapplication of Israel.
Your graft in Israel idea doesn't line up with Scripture. I understand your application of Rom 3:4. Essentially you're bypassing the mods with it calling me a lair.

I fully agree with Peter in Acts 5:29. I also believe -

1 John 3:23 And this is his commandment, That we should believe on the name of his Son Jesus Christ, and love one another, as he gave us commandment.

If you also believed this verse we would have no argument over the law as an obligation for the Christian. You already said there are no Jews in Jesus Christ. So quit coming back trying to make Jews out of gentiles.
Not at all brother who is the them in ROMANS 11:17 where it says that the gentiles are grafted in among them? Yep you guessed it ISRAEL
The saints aren't Israel - Eph 2:19. Again the one fold isn't Israel - Jn 10:16.
 
Upvote 0

eleos1954

God is Love
Site Supporter
Nov 14, 2017
11,029
6,446
Utah
✟856,269.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others

Jer 31:31-33 God calls it the NEW Covenant - this verse, when I go into the Greek the word new does not appear .... it refers to it as "the covenant".

It is true Adam knew about Gods law/laws, the 1st of course being the most important as we are told in scripture. If the 1st is kept ... then all the rest fall in place.

Matthew 22:36-40

36 “Teacher, what is the most important commandment in the Law?”

37 Jesus answered:

Love the Lord your God with all your heart, soul, and mind. 38 This is the first and most important commandment. 39 The second most important commandment is like this one. And it is, “Love others as much as you love yourself.” 40 All the Law of Moses and the Books of the Prophets[a] are based on these two commandments.

This is of course still true according to the better covenant in that we receive salvation through Jesus.

Hebrews 8

6Now, however, Jesus has received a much more excellent ministry, just as the covenant He mediates is better and is founded on better promises. 7For if that first covenant had been without fault, no place would have been sought for a second.

It seems to me to be this way: The OT covenant included the big 10, plus the ceremonial/sacrificial system. The ceremonial/sacrificial part was done away with by Jesus sacrifice on the cross. No longer needed because Jesus was the final sacrifice for all.

So, because the 10 still stand (and always will) that part of the OT covenant is not new. It is better (made fresh) because through Jesus standing in our stead and we will be saved rather than condemned.

In keeping the 10, people cite works, legalism etc. ... it could be ... it could not be. It's about motive (what is in the heart). Is one keeping the commandments thinking their own efforts of doing so will save them? No = wrong motive. Is one keeping the commandments because they love Jesus and being responsive to His Holy Spirit? Yes - correct motive.

And only God knows the heart of each of us and what our hearts motives are.

Psalm 44:21 would not God have discovered it, since he knows the secrets of the heart?

Luke 16:15 He said to them, “You are the ones who justify yourselves in the eyes of others, but God knows your hearts. What people value highly is detestable in God’s sight.

Acts 15:8 God, who knows the heart, showed that he accepted them by giving the Holy Spirit to them, just as he did to us.

Romans 8:27 And he who searches our hearts knows the mind of the Spirit, because the Spirit intercedes for God’s people in accordance with the will of God.

The 10 are actually laws of Love ... it's all about Love. God is Love. If what we do is out of Love for Him ... then there is no problem. He instills love in our hearts and minds (through the Holy Spirit) His Love in us (knowing we will mess up here and there) and His Holy Spirit will help us to overcome (a life time process) and intercedes for us as His love conquers all things. God is Love and His love conquers all things, not us.

1st Corinthians 13

13 And now these three remain: faith, hope, and love; but the greatest of these is love (God is love).

God Bless.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: LoveGodsWord
Upvote 0

ace of hearts

Well-Known Member
Nov 15, 2018
3,507
1,149
west coast
✟39,128.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Is 56:6-8 gentiles (not Jews) are specifically singled out for Sabbath keeping



Not true. They are gentiles. "Foreigners". And it does not matter where they live according to Isaiah 56.
A foreigner is -

1 : a person belonging to or owing allegiance to a foreign country

2 chiefly dialectal : one not native to a place or community

If a person take up the covenant (joins the Lord in Isa 56) they no longer qualify as a foreigner. They're treated as one born in the land - meaning a Jew. The verse is about the rites of Israel (Judaism). This would include all rites of the covenant including the sabbath. Your Isa 56 quote includes "holds fast My covenant." That includes the 7th day sabbath in the famous 10 which is the covenant (Jer 31:32 and Deut 4:13)
So it is gentiles .. foreigners "all nations" in Isaiah 56 -- not circumcised passover-keeping Jews.
Yes if you're burning animals. Remember that is done away with according to you.
And it is foreigners - "god fearers" in Acts 14 - gentiles that are worshiping in the Synagogue "Sabbath after Sabbath" and asking for MORE Gospel preaching "NEXT Sabbath" when the "entire town" shows up... still gentiles.
Yes and they're not Christians. They're proselytes to Judaism.
Thus it is that gentiles show up in Acts 17:1-4 and in Acts 18:4-6 Sabbath after Sabbath in the synagogue for Gospel preaching.
Who did you say shows up?
The text you reference only speaks about Passover and circumcision ... nothing at all in it about gentiles in all nations and the weekly Sabbath.
Ex 12:48 speaks about the rites of Israel (Judaism).
By contrast - the texts I point to - do reference gentiles in all nations and the weekly Sabbath. and we see them not only in Isaiah 56 but also in the NT - in Acts 13, Acts 17, Acts 18 -- Sabbath after Sabbath... gentiles, not Jews
These people you speak of aren't Christians.
Isaiah 56 does not say the foreigner lives in Israel. Those gentiles keeping Sabbath in Acts 13, Acts 17, Acts 18 were not in Israel, were not circumcised, were not Jews.
Again these people aren't Christians.
You are conflating two different things.
No. I'm not mixing or promoting gentiles and Jews as Christian. You are though.
1. The liturgy of worship - before the cross vs after (no matter if the one worshiping is a Jew or gentile)
2. the requirement of a gentile worshiper to ALSO become a circumcised Jew IF they want to also observe the Passover.
Observing Passover is a religious rite of worship.

Ex 23:17 Three times in the year all thy males shall appear before the Lord GOD. Those time are the feasts and times of worship.
Details matter.

Animal sacrifices needed before the cross -- no matter if one was Jew or gentile.
Isa 56 requires animal burning.
Gentiles needed to be circumcised if they wanted to go to the temple and keep Passover -- no matter if it was before the cross or after.
No it applies only to people joining themselves to the Lord which requires keeping all the law as given thru Moses to Israel.
But none of those gentiles in Acts 13, `17, 18 worshiping in the synagogues every Sabbath are Jews - rather they are called "God fearing gentiles" -- they keep Sabbath but they are not circumcised Jews.
Neither are they Christians. Many were persuaded to become Christians though.
Bible details matter. Nice try though.
Yes keep trying.
On the contrary - "god fearing gentiles"
Not Christians. Still doesn't make them Christians.
Full converts were not called gentiles and could enter the temple.
That's correct -Ex 12:48.
Ex 12
48 But if a stranger sojourns with you, and celebrates the Passover to the Lord, let all his males be circumcised, and then let him come near to celebrate it; and he shall be like a native of the land. But no uncircumcised person may eat of it
A stranger is -
(1): foreigner

(2) : a resident alien

b : one in the house of another as a guest, visitor, or intruder

c : a person or thing that is unknown or with whom one is unacquainted

d : one who does not belong to or is kept from the activities of a group

e : one not privy or party to an act, contract, or title : one that interferes without right

2 : one ignorant of or unacquainted with someone or something

To sojourn means -

a temporary stay

So the verse only applies to visitors (aliens) as long as they stay.
A Jew could not become a priest either - they had to be Levites and in fact descendant from Aaron.
We use the word Jews to mean all Israeli these days. I'm unwilling to police this technicality to be compliant with you. Then the evidence is the law is over because Jesus is our Priest -

Heb 7:11 If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron?

12 For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law.

13 For he of whom these things are spoken pertaineth to another tribe, of which no man gave attendance at the altar.

14 For it is evident that our Lord sprang out of Juda; of which tribe Moses spake nothing concerning priesthood.

15 And it is yet far more evident: for that after the similitude of Melchisedec there ariseth another priest,

16 Who is made, not after the law of a carnal commandment, but after the power of an endless life.

17 For he testifieth, Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec.

18 For there is verily a disannulling of the commandment going before for the weakness and unprofitableness thereof.

19 For the law made nothing perfect, but the bringing in of a better hope did; by the which we draw nigh unto God.

20 And inasmuch as not without an oath he was made priest:

21 (For those priests were made without an oath; but this with an oath by him that said unto him, The Lord sware and will not repent, Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec

22 By so much was Jesus made a surety of a better testament.

23 And they truly were many priests, because they were not suffered to continue by reason of death:

24 But this man, because he continueth ever, hath an unchangeable priesthood.

25 Wherefore he is able also to save them to the uttermost that come unto God by him, seeing he ever liveth to make intercession for them.

26 For such an high priest became us, who is holy, harmless, undefiled, separate from sinners, and made higher than the heavens;

27 Who needeth not daily, as those high priests, to offer up sacrifice, first for his own sins, and then for the people's: for this he did once, when he offered up himself.

28 For the law maketh men high priests which have infirmity; but the word of the oath, which was since the law, maketh the Son, who is consecrated for evermore.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

ace of hearts

Well-Known Member
Nov 15, 2018
3,507
1,149
west coast
✟39,128.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
We know who you believe.
 
Reactions: LoveGodsWord
Upvote 0

ace of hearts

Well-Known Member
Nov 15, 2018
3,507
1,149
west coast
✟39,128.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Jer 31:31-33 God calls it the NEW Covenant - this verse, when I go into the Greek the word new does not appear .... it refers to it as "the covenant".
I don't know where you get your version from, but my version includes the word "new" in both Jeremiah and Hebrews.
 
Upvote 0

ace of hearts

Well-Known Member
Nov 15, 2018
3,507
1,149
west coast
✟39,128.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I think so. Aren't you required to respond to your own point about D.L. Moody after seeing his sermon on the Ten Commandments say what we all just saw it say - regarding the Sabbath commandment?
What is the source of your quote? I'll back up my claim with proper documentation after you do. Yes I already knew about your quote and my claim. They're from the very same source. I've read the forum including your formal debate on the subject which includes your quote.
 
Upvote 0

ace of hearts

Well-Known Member
Nov 15, 2018
3,507
1,149
west coast
✟39,128.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Your repeating yourself now brother read the chapter your quoting from. This was already addressed earlier by adding the context you left out of the scriptures you were trying to quote.
Is Joshua 8:32 God's Word and true?
 
Upvote 0

eleos1954

God is Love
Site Supporter
Nov 14, 2017
11,029
6,446
Utah
✟856,269.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others

made another post with more detailed info

Why is the day of worship controversial?
I don't know where you get your version from, but my version includes the word "new" in both Jeremiah and Hebrews.

It's in several versions you can compare them here if you like. www.biblehub.com

I guess it really doesn't matter if one calls it a new covenant or a better covenant as long as the 10 are not dismissed, is really the point. Better covenant makes more sense to me ... because that makes the big 10 part still standing from the "original" covenant. The entire OT covenant was not completely made irrelevant ... or not needed .... it was the ceremonial/sacrificial part that was made irrelevant or not needed because of Jesus.

God Bless.
 
Upvote 0

ace of hearts

Well-Known Member
Nov 15, 2018
3,507
1,149
west coast
✟39,128.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
No because of Jer 31:32.
 
Upvote 0

ace of hearts

Well-Known Member
Nov 15, 2018
3,507
1,149
west coast
✟39,128.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Where does Paul say not murdering (killing) is keeping (doing) the law? What I gather from you is the wicked are also keeping the law. That isn't true. They would ask you what are you talking about.
 
Upvote 0

ace of hearts

Well-Known Member
Nov 15, 2018
3,507
1,149
west coast
✟39,128.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
True - it is a benefit, a blessing -- for mankind

"The Sabbath was made for mankind" Mark 2:27



Who says He waited??
Is there any indication in the OT the sabbath was made for mankind? Please quote it. None of your verses below indicate that. So what.
 
Upvote 0

ace of hearts

Well-Known Member
Nov 15, 2018
3,507
1,149
west coast
✟39,128.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
They do but they agree to certain obvious Bible details regarding the Sabbath Commandment that you have been opposing and that I have been promoting.

That point remains.
Only by misrepresentation. Most of the list don't observe the 7th day sabbath and therefore are talking about their day of worship as Saturday.
 
Upvote 0

ace of hearts

Well-Known Member
Nov 15, 2018
3,507
1,149
west coast
✟39,128.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
There is not one scripture that says God's 4th commandment has been abolished and we are now commanded to keep Sunday as a holy day. I suggest you read your bible.
There's no such command in the NT.
 
Upvote 0

ace of hearts

Well-Known Member
Nov 15, 2018
3,507
1,149
west coast
✟39,128.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Your only real contention is the day of worship and not evil activity.
 
Upvote 0

ace of hearts

Well-Known Member
Nov 15, 2018
3,507
1,149
west coast
✟39,128.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I reject your call to Judaism. Paul is admonishing us to imitate him. Paul didn't follow the law after conversion. If he did he couldn't say - "We are now delivered from the law..." Please don't chastise me for not quoting the whole verse, it doesn't invalidate what I quoted. Besides the the context is the famous 10 by citation in v 7. There's no requirement in Acts 15 to attend synagogue.

I have to ask why would they as followers of Jesus need to learn how to follow Moses and the law?

Who is they in Col 2? It doesn't say they were doing anything. It says let no one condemn you about the matter. This goes either way. Col 2:20-23 is about carnal commandments of which the famous 10 are.

1 Peter 1:13-16 Isn't a call to keep the law.
 
Upvote 0

ace of hearts

Well-Known Member
Nov 15, 2018
3,507
1,149
west coast
✟39,128.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
and "yet" they all admit to basic Bible details about the Sabbath commandment that you oppose - and I accept. Which was the point...

The point remains.
You keep trying to make them mean something they didn't and still don't.
 
Upvote 0

ace of hearts

Well-Known Member
Nov 15, 2018
3,507
1,149
west coast
✟39,128.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
You use this against us and refuse to admit your own guilt.

I'm still waiting for your discussion and testimony concerning Ex 20:8-11.
 
Upvote 0