- Sep 27, 2019
- 4,866
- 5,027
- 35
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- In Relationship
Indeed I do as a large percent of those 40,000 posts of mine on this forum demonstrate.
I'm all ears...
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Indeed I do as a large percent of those 40,000 posts of mine on this forum demonstrate.
I'm all ears...
ok we see the term used to describe a place of torment and suffering which in Rev 20 is an event that happens on planet Earth after the 1000 years - according to scripture. Torment and suffering in what the Bible calls "a lake of fire" which apparently causes the world as we know it to "pass away" and is not merely the point where God "destroys both body and soul in hell" Matt 10:28
I've come to dismiss most of modern "evangelical Protestantism", and those parts of "mainline" Protestantism that have decided to worship the zeitgeist rather than God. I've fled to Anglo-Catholicism, but find myself becoming almost daily more Catholic and less Anglo. I have RCC and Coptic friends who urge me to come and join them, and I reckon it's only a matter of time I opt for one or the other. Truth be told, the only thing that has stopped me from joining the Copts here is that their congregations are all roughly 99% Egyptian and I'm afraid I'd be "the old Chinese guy" forever.On this basis, do you dismiss all of Protestantism?
Consider these verses;Presumably God would have foreseen that the vagueness in the Bible about heaven and hell would lead to different interpretations and the arguments we see today about Infernalism, Annihalism and Universalism.
Did He have a good reason for keeping things so undefined?
Mark 4:11-12 seems to suggest so when it talks about why Jesus used parables:
11 And he said to them, “To you has been given the secret of the kingdom of God, but for those outside everything comes in parables, 12 in order thatIs it a deliberate ploy intended to make us reflect on these things as honestly as we can?
‘they may indeed look but not perceive,
and may indeed hear but not understand;
so that they may not turn again and be forgiven.’ ”
Or was it because that Jesus didn't want us to think too much about heaven and hell but instead to focus on living a Godly life while on earth?
Would it have been impossible for Him to have been clearer because our natural fear of the unknown, of "that undiscovered country from whose bourne no traveler returns" (Shakespeare), would have led us to interpret His words to conjure up the infernalist vision of something like ECT whatever He had said? The purpose of such a vision would be to justify and authenticate our fears to ourselves.
Or are there other reasons?
This is quite a gloomy topic but the the Good News is that God comes to find us in our misunderstanding and fear and brings us home. This is the universalist vision.
just as Sodom and Gomorrah and the cities around them, since they in the same way as these angels indulged in sexual perversion and went after strange flesh, are exhibited as an example in undergoing the punishment of eternal fire.
Paying attention "to details" is way better than skimming over them.
Kinda like "Take, eat, this is My Body", huh?Everything in the Bible is questioned, doubted, alternate views etc.. If the Bible says God did something in 7 days - literal evenings and mornings - Genesis 1 -- then many Christians will say "oh no that does not mean what it says..."
But Sodom and Gomorrah are not still burning are they?
How to explain this? What about the fire is described as "eternal" because it is from God, not because it is going to burn forever, which it very clearly didn't?
Kinda like "Take, eat, this is My Body", huh?![]()
So He couldn't have really meant what He said, right?Kinda like -
No one bites Jesus at the last supper And no one bites Jesus in John 6.
Kinda like -
No one bites Jesus at the last supper
And no one bites Jesus in John 6.
48 I am the bread of life. 49 Your fathers ate the manna in the wilderness, and they died. 50 This is the bread which comes down out of heaven, so that one may eat of it and not die. 51 I am the living bread that came down out of heaven; if anyone eats of this bread, he will live forever; and the bread also which I will give for the life of the world is My flesh.” 52 Then the Jews began to argue with one another, saying, “How can this man give us His flesh to eat?” 53 So Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood, you have no life in yourselves. 54 He who eats My flesh and drinks My blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day. 55 For My flesh is true food, and My blood is true drink. 56 He who eats My flesh and drinks My blood abides in Me, and I in him.
And Jesus is not "made out of wood" in John 10 -
7 So Jesus said to them again, “Truly, truly, I say to you, I am the door of the sheep. 8 All who came before Me are thieves and robbers, but the sheep did not hear them. 9 I am the door; if anyone enters through Me, he will be saved, and will go in and out and find pasture.
Jesus smacks the disciples for not getting that symbolism in Matt 16
5 And the disciples came to the other side of the sea, but they had forgotten to bring any bread. 6 And Jesus said to them, “Watch out and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and Sadducees.” 7 They began to discuss this among themselves, saying, “He said that because we did not bring any bread.” 8 But Jesus, aware of this, said, “You men of little faith, why do you discuss among yourselves that you have no bread? 9 Do you not yet understand or remember the five loaves of the five thousand, and how many baskets full you picked up? 10 Or the seven loaves of the four thousand, and how many large baskets full you picked up? 11 How is it that you do not understand that I did not speak to you concerning bread? But beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and Sadducees.” 12 Then they understood that He did not say to beware of the leaven of bread, but of the teaching of the Pharisees and Sadducees.
He was using the symbol of bread for 'teaching' --
And in John 6 He explains that symbol in terms of eating His body --
60 So then many of His disciples, when they heard this, said, “This statement is very unpleasant; who can listen to it?” 61 But Jesus, aware that His disciples were complaining about this, said to them, “Is this offensive to you? 62 What then if you see the Son of Man ascending to where He was before? 63 It is the Spirit who gives life; the flesh provides no benefit; the words that I have spoken to you are spirit, and are life. 64 But there are some of you who do not believe.”
So He couldn't have really meant what He said, right? .
If I remember correctly, it is 2,000 miles on every side.The New Jerusalem ( a perfect squared cube) fits perfectly fine on God true creation.
John witnessed the angel measuring the New Jerusalem. Why would you measure the Bride of Christ like a physical object?I am relatively certain, for example, that Revelation 21's account of the New Jerusalem is referring to the actual Bride of Christ, the Church, the Elect. I have many reasons to think so. But I am not sure. What I AM sure about is that if I am right, I don't know much about it, relatively, though the whole two last chapters of Revelation talk about little else. If I am right about the New Jerusalem, there is a whole lot more to it than I know.
Thanks.I've come to dismiss most of modern "evangelical Protestantism", and those parts of "mainline" Protestantism that have decided to worship the zeitgeist rather than God.
Sure. As I said, literalism when it suits your doctrine as set forth by your prophet, and just symbolism when it doesn't. So you maintain that the universe is - what? 6000 years old? - when it manifestly is not, but cast aside the very words of our Lord, which He reiterated on more than one occasion. And that's typical of SDA exegesis, to begin with a doctrinal position assumed a priori then "interpret" the Scripture to fit. For instance, the exegetical gymnastics y'all have to perform to preserve the Mosaic dietary laws intact are particularly hilarious.Well... everyone biting Christ in John 6 - does not leave any room to even have "the last supper".
The hole is there, the "screaming people" bit is pure fiction.The Kola Bore Hole in Russia is one example. It is currently the deepest hole on the planet. They lowered a special mic into it and got a recording. It melted b/c the calculated temperatures were hotter than expected. The audio sounds like millions of people constantly screaming.
If I remember correctly, it is 2,000 miles on every side.
How tall is the dome? (atmosphere)
The fire came from heaven. Nothing says the fire did not return to heaven after destroying Sodom, Gomorrah and the cities of the plain.But Sodom and Gomorrah are not still burning are they?
How to explain this? What about the fire is described as "eternal" because it is from God, not because it is going to burn forever, which it very clearly didn't? * * *
Yes, indeed! Curious, eh? I don't know, but I expect to find out. One lesson out of it, though, is that we do not see things the way God does, and Heaven is immensely more than what we can possibly imagine! Another is that God deals with us corporately in a way that modern man is uncomfortable with, and individually in a way modern man cannot even conceive of. We are members of each other, in him.John witnessed the angel measuring the New Jerusalem. Why would you measure the Bride of Christ like a physical object?