• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Why is it that many Christians

Status
Not open for further replies.

Gregory Thompson

Change is inevitable, feel free to spare some.
Site Supporter
Dec 20, 2009
30,176
8,504
Canada
✟882,152.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Married
Sins as a basis is what causes harm to another. It literally means to "miss the mark" . The cultural commands related to diet are addressed in the New Testament Passages, what matters is what happens on the inside of a person. Generally when laying down the law, whether it be dietary restrictions or transgressions related to grammEr, there is one sin underlying the discourse: The covetous need to control others.
.
The point of pointing out people's faults isn't to seem knowledgable in bible trivia, or the all powerful judgment police ... the basis is compassion. If it is a sin, the person is causing harm to themselves and others ... you do know that even stress is the cause of so many illnesses these days? and what causes stress more than anything? Control freaks ... that's why coveting to control your neighbour is a foundational sin, it leads to so much other trouble.
 
Upvote 0

Vicomte13

Well-Known Member
Jan 6, 2016
3,655
1,816
Westport, Connecticut
✟108,837.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Ultimately, he was sentenced by the sanhedrin
with blasphemy for saying the name "Yahweh' which had
been forbidden by the Rabbis.

He was convicted when he was asked point blank by Caiaphas whether or not he was the Son of God, and he answered definitively "I am". Then Caiaphas tore his garments and asked what more evidence was needed - he blasphemed (according to them) right there. So they voted for his death.
 
Upvote 0

yeshuaslavejeff

simple truth, martyr, disciple of Yahshua
Jan 6, 2005
39,946
11,096
okie
✟222,536.00
Faith
Anabaptist
God gave us the Lanciano Eucharistic Miracle to clear up any doubt on this matter. The bread and wine become the body and blood, literally.
Yes, that's what people say. That's not what God's Word says.
Remember what God's Word says is most important for life -
God always told the Truth. Men don't.
Most people choose to believe men.
That's easier, more popular, and quite a wide road.
I'm on the narrow , painful, road to iife Jesus talked about, that few find.
Popularity means nothing to me.
WHat Jesus says - that is differenet than what men say.
I'll stick with Jesus - He has the only words that lead to true life.
 
Upvote 0

Vicomte13

Well-Known Member
Jan 6, 2016
3,655
1,816
Westport, Connecticut
✟108,837.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Yes, that's what people say. That's not what God's Word says.
Remember what God's Word says is most important for life -
God always told the Truth. Men don't.
Most people choose to believe men.
That's easier, more popular, and quite a wide road.
I'm on the narrow , painful, road to iife Jesus talked about, that few find.
Popularity means nothing to me.
WHat Jesus says - that is differenet than what men say.
I'll stick with Jesus - He has the only words that lead to true life.

God has remained present in the world and done and said things since Revelation. The Bible is good, but it doesn't contain all of God's revelations. The Lanciano Eucharistic Miracle occurred 500 years after the era of Scripture.
The Lourdes healings are still occurring now.

These miraculous demonstrations of divine power are as authoritative as the words written in the Bible, and they come later in time than the Bible, so the information they convey supersedes any contrary understanding that men have derived from just reading the Bible.

God didn't stop being God when Jesus Ascended. He didn't cease to guide, to reveal and to perform miracles. Some men's traditions say that he did, and that the "era of miracles" or "era of revelation" or whatever, ended with the closing of the Canon of Scripture. This is false.

We have the Shroud of Turin, which proves the divinity of Christ (and puts the kebosh on Paul's Hellenized opposition to long hair). The shroud is mentioned in all four Gospels, but the image is only barely alluded to (John looked, and saw, and believed - WHAT he saw was not specified).

Lanciano is obviously not in the Bible, because it happened in the 600s AD.

The various incorrupt bodies of saints are not in the Bible, because they occurred later.

The Marian apparition at Lourdes, and the subsequent ongoing stream of Biblical-sized healing miracles from that very place is not in the Bible, but an answer to its critics it is ("Can Satan cast out Satan?" - followed by the warning about blaspheming the Holy Spirit).

The basis of our beliefs is different. I read the book BECAUSE God revealed himself to me by personal miracles, the public miracles God left behind demonstrated that God has consistently done so for people over time, and the information contained in the miracles lead me to understand that Jesus' father is the actual God (as opposed to the Muslims' or Hindus' or others' gods). The book is a tertiary source for me.

For you, the Book is the very foundation of your faith. You believe the Book and reason from it. I never could believe the book had divine miracles not brought me to the realization that God is, and the content of the miracles revealed WHO God is. The Book fleshes that out, but it doesn't supersede the miracles that brought me to know God in the first place.

You dance with the one who brung you. The Book brought you. Miracles brought me. There is nothing good served by striving with each other. Our faith is built on different things, and always will be. I never could believe on the basis on which you believe. And you don't need the basis on which I believe to believe. I think that's the best place to leave it. I think the core of what matters is what one does with the knowledge that God is, and that God wants something of us. That's what I focus on. I find brawling over the book to be unrewarding, given that the book is in third place of authority for me anyway (tied with the Church).

So let's part ways in peace.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

1John2:4

Well-Known Member
Jun 8, 2016
1,204
361
48
New Braunfels, TX
✟40,108.00
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Private
And further, God's Law makes it clear that once a Jew breaks from the tradition - example, not circumcising, or not honoring dietary laws, he is "cut off from his people". That doesn't mean killed, or doesn't have it. It means that, as far as God's covenant was concerned, he's no longer under it. Which means, concretely, he no longer would be eligible for that farm in Israel (assuming that there still were covenantal Israel for there to be a farm).

So, even if somebody had a Hebrew "bloodline", if he were not circumcised and obedient within it, he was not part of the Hebrew covenant in any case. By contrast, anybody who went to the trouble of getting circumcised and following the law became a Hebrew. All of those people in the desert with Moses were not, for the most part, descended from Jacob. They were Egyptian slaves who were joined to the Jacobites by the Exodus and Sinai.

You are right the mixed multitude was with Israel in the desert, just like at the end in Revelation a mixed multitude will stand with the 144,000 (Revelation 7). It seams as if you are very versed in Revelation, who do you believe are the two witnesses?
 
Upvote 0

yeshuaslavejeff

simple truth, martyr, disciple of Yahshua
Jan 6, 2005
39,946
11,096
okie
✟222,536.00
Faith
Anabaptist
As one of those apostles sent by God said, don't believe anything if it is different than the Gospel first delivered. Test BY God's Word, not by experience.

A billion things opposed to God's Word may be published every minute of every day.
None of them are true.
Nothing opposed to God's Word is true (not to have faith in, not to trust).

Some people choose to believe false prophets and false teachers. This has been the case for thousands of years, OT and NT.
How to tell the difference ? (between true and false)
Most people on earth never tell the difference - they cannot.
So, maybe telling HOW to tell the difference won't help anyone.
In fact, even when Jesus tells, the vast majority on earth don't believe Him.
(Remember He said that would happen - the vast majority on earth won't believe Him?)

So, we can today believe Jesus, with the few who do,
or believe anyone else, with the big crowd that does.

I choose to believe Jesus. His Word is True. His Word is the test. (not even a miracle can change that).

Oh, for those who want to know - who didn't read the rest of the paragraph yet in the BIBLE,
Jesus did say the body and blood are "real" , yes. (not ever "flesh") but "real".
Remember God is Spirit ? Of course, everyone remembers.
AND God is REAL ? No question. God is Real. God is Spirit.
Jesus said (and Jesus is never wrong) that His Words are Spirit, and they are Life.
Ta da! See how simple it is, when we listen to JESUS ?

JESUS IS REAL ! HIS WORDS ARE SPIRIT, and THEY ARE LIFE. He never approved an abomination or even a hint of cannibalism - God the Father FORBIDS THAT. Jesus would NEVER oppose God the Father! Would He?
 
Upvote 0

1John2:4

Well-Known Member
Jun 8, 2016
1,204
361
48
New Braunfels, TX
✟40,108.00
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Private
In the New Testament these laws of separation are explicitly set aside. In Paul's letter to the Galatians he goes into this quite particularly. Jewish believers were trying to impose circumcision on Gentile believers in conformity to the laws of separation they had as a nation observed for many centuries. But Paul resists the efforts of the Jewish believers very critically:

Were is the scripture that states that these laws are set aside? Do you own a farm ? Personally, I do not have a farm, but if I did I may listen to His instructions on how to grow food and treat my animals, after all He is the One who created the earth and every living thing in it. I have a body and I am assuming you have one as well, if the One who created me and carefully stitched me together in my mother's womb says not to eat certain things maybe I should listen.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Vicomte13

Well-Known Member
Jan 6, 2016
3,655
1,816
Westport, Connecticut
✟108,837.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
You are right the mixed multitude was with Israel in the desert, just like at the end in Revelation a mixed multitude will stand with the 144,000 (Revelation 7). It seams as if you are very versed in Revelation, who do you believe are the two witnesses?

I probably read Scripture very differently from you, so please don't be startled by my answer. The cardinal reference point for me is what Jesus said: "Man does not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeds forth out of the mouth of God." So, in my multiple reads of the Bible, I have focused in on the words directly spoken by Elohiym, by YHWH, by the Father, by Jesus or by angels as messengers of God.

Those are the words that I focus on in the text, and I interpret everything else around THOSE words, which I take to be THE authority in Scripture, because with those words God has inspired the Scripture to specifically identify himself as speaking the words.

So, when I read Jesus say "Every words that proceeds forth out of the mouth of God", I take that as the proper hermeneutic by which the Bible is to be read. THE authoritative words of the Bible are the ones that God spoke directly. The rest of the Bible must always be interpreted in terms of THOSE words. Where there is conflict (and there is), the God is God, so God's words must always override all of the other words.

So, when I read Revelation, I'm looking primarily at the parts where Jesus dictates the letters to the Churches, and then I look at the end where Jesus speaks to John again and speaks of the terms of final judgment. All of the stuff in the middle - all of the images, etc., I read as visions of future events. And back in the Gospels I read Jesus telling me not to fret about the end times or what will happen, sings and visions.

Therefore, I pretty much ignore all of the details of the prophesies and end times, because to me they are irrelevant. I live. I will die, probably. When I do, it will either be with the end of the world, or it will be before. It makes no difference either way. The only thing that ultimately makes a difference is passing final judgment, and that requires not doing certain things. Not doing some of those things is easy (I'm not into killing people or selling drugs). Not doing some of those things (like not lying and not indulging in sexual immorality - even of the mind) is much, MUCH harder. So, contrary to the assertions of the confident, I know that the final disposition of my case is by no means guaranteed. I am going to have to be forgiven my sins.

Jesus supplies the promise regarding that, again out of his own mouth: you will be forgiven your sins by the Father to the extent you forgive others their sins against you. Ok. Not sin, ever...that I don't think I can go. But forgive others their sins - yes, I can do that. And that's all I have to do to be forgiven mine, according to Jesus. So, all I have to do I really believe Jesus was telling the truth when he said that, that he had the real authority to say such things truly - which means that I have to believe in his Sonship and divinity, which I do, thanks to miracles.

Mine is a very practical religion. Where, then, is there room in my approach to faith for intricate knowledge of the specifics of the Revelation prophesies? Truly, those images were given for other people, for people who care about such things and are eager to devote time and energy to them. I've skipped to the end of the story already and am just focused on what I am supposed to do, what I control. I know God exists because I've talked to him and had my life saved directly by him. I know that Jesus is divine and that God is associated with him because of the public miracles (Shroud, Lanciano, Incorrupt and Lourdes). Because Jesus is divine and his God, the Father, is God, I listen to the Church he founded, and read the book containing his words, looking specifically for his words. And that's what I focus on.

So, when it comes to the 144,000, I've never given it any thought, because in truth, I really don't care. Nor do I care if the world came into existence "poof" or evolved over billions of years. I don't care if there are wild inaccuracies in the Bible.

What I care about, all I really care about, is living forever as myself. And that requires me to not kill, not lie, not be sexually immoral, not sell drugs, not give divine service to other gods, not be a dog or filthy. And if I am, to be forgiven of that, I must forgive other men everything I have against them. That, and only that, assures that I pass the final exam.

Then, to have a GOOD room in the City of God - as opposed to being the least and sweeping the streets - I have to be kind, merciful, to love others as I love myself, or at least try to.

And just those things are a full-time job.

I've taken a lot of time to carefully read the Greek of what Jesus really said. Some of our translations are treacherous, so I have to go to the Greek. Which means I've contended with the manuscript differences. Also, I don't really read Greek, so it is very slow word-for-word processing.

But really, it's only the "hard" or contradictory statements of Jesus that need precision. Example: "Blessed are the poor in spirit..." What? This really is "Happy, in spirit, are the poor..." and the reason they are happy is that they have (or can have) the particular attention of God, in part because they aren't burdened by material distractions, and in part because they haven't done the evil things necessary to accumulate great wealth and power.

So, what I look at, I look at deeply. But I look at different things that other Christians look at.

Which is why I don't have an answer to your question, other than "I don't know".
 
Upvote 0

Vicomte13

Well-Known Member
Jan 6, 2016
3,655
1,816
Westport, Connecticut
✟108,837.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Were is scripture does it state these laws are set aside?

It doesn't say they are set aside. Where in Scripture does it say that you don't have to obey the law of kings? I presume you are an American, and don't want to see a monarchy. Why not? The law of kings, given by Samuel, is also still in force.

The answer is that the law of kings was given by Samuel to Israel. And the Law of Moses was given by YHWH to Israel. Those laws are not just generic laws for mankind. They are actually not laws at all. They are, rather, terms of a binding contract between God, on the one hand, and a specifically defined set of people, on the other.

You're not part of that people, so none of the terms of that contract apply to you, or ever did apply to you.

Israel was strictly bounded. Farming rules for Israel don't work in Sweden. In fact, Eskimos cannot live if they don't eat animal fat - it is the bulk of their diet. What that means is NOT that people shouldn't be living in Arctic, for God commanded that men fill all of the land. What it means is that JEWS were never intended to live in the Arctic. They were intended to all live in Israel, where God's specific laws, for that climate in that particular land, were targeted.

Consider the counting of days by sunrises and sunsets. It is impossible to follow the Jewish calendar north of the Arctic Circle, in the land of the Midnight Sun, because the Summer Sabbath day lasts for six months, without sunset.

Those laws were not intended to limit where mankind can live. Those laws were only ever for Hebrews, living under God's rule specifically in Israel. And the Hebrews were all supposed to live THERE, forever (unless they broke the laws and were scattered with the destruction of Israel), so Hebrews were never supposed to be living in places where they couldn't keep the Sabbath. But there ARE places where the Sabbath cannot be kept: Northern Sweden, Finland, Norway, Russia, Canada, Alaska. It is impossible to keep the Sabbath in the land of the Midnight Sun. It is also impossible to keep the Jewish dietary laws. Which doesn't mean those natives who settled there, fulfilling the commandment to fill the land and subdue it, were in breach of "The Law" until Jesus. The Law of Moses never, ever, at any time before or after Jesus, applied to anybody but people living in Israel. That's it. That's all.

A Christian error is to see the Jewish law as having been "for them", and seeing Jesus as having "freed us from that law".
Paul seems to say that. But Paul WAS A JEW LIVING IN ISRAEL! And he was writing those things to Jews! JEWS had that issue to work out! If you're a JEW, do you still have to keep the Law of Moses? Judaizers said yes. Paul and the Apostles at Jerusalem said no.

The danger of just reading the Bible is that it's easy to think of one's self as being the target of the OT laws, and then seeing Jesus freeing us from those laws...or not. But that's a misread. The OT covenant at Sinai wasn't WITH us. It was with those Hebrews. We weren't FREED from that, because we were never under it in the first place. What WE are freed from is the fear of death, and we are given the certitude of life after death, and the promise of life with God in his City if we follow what Jesus said. That's the whole deal for us.

It's also the whole deal for Jews. All of that bit about the Law, and the anxieties about it, were JEWS (Paul, Peter, James, etc.) talking to Jews (the other apostles, and the early Christians) trying to figure out how as JEWS they were to deal with the Jewish Law.

GENTILES never had that anxiety. And Gentiles really err by reading Scripture simply and taking on that anxiety, or the belief that we are "freed" from a contract we were never a party too.

This seems to be controversial with a lot of people. But it's actually obvious if one really READS the text and sees to whom the covenant applies.
 
Upvote 0

1John2:4

Well-Known Member
Jun 8, 2016
1,204
361
48
New Braunfels, TX
✟40,108.00
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Private
I understand you want to say that all laws from God, regardless of context, are to be obeyed, but doing so is a poor way of handling His word and a certain way to fall into bondage to false doctrine.

The laws concerning diet, and appearance, and gardening, and clothing and all the other such laws that were given to Israel by God were to remind them at every turn of their "called out" status. They were His Chosen People who were to be distinctly separate from the pagan nations around them. That separation was figured in a multitude of mundane aspects of their living: separate clothing fibers, keep seeds in the garden separate, distinguish between clean and unclean food and separate the two, and so on. These laws ordered the external living of the Israelites, but as the Israelites demonstrated again and again, it was easy to conform to these laws externally while internally being far from God. External laws could not change the wicked human heart.

In the New Testament these laws of separation are explicitly set aside. In Paul's letter to the Galatians he goes into this quite particularly. Jewish believers were trying to impose circumcision on Gentile believers in conformity to the laws of separation they had as a nation observed for many centuries. But Paul resists the efforts of the Jewish believers very critically:

Galatians 3:2-3
2 This only I want to learn from you: Did you receive the Spirit by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith?
3 Are you so foolish? Having begun in the Spirit, are you now being made perfect by the flesh?


Paul asks how the spiritual regeneration obtained by believers by God's grace through faith in Christ totally apart from any righteous works of the flesh (Eph. 2:8, 9) can be "made perfect," or completed, by fleshly adherence to the law? How can an internal, spiritual event be completed by external acts of the flesh, however righteous? Quite simply, they cannot. Paul indicates to the Galatians that such an idea is foolish.

He goes on:

Galatians 3:10-14
10 For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse; for it is written, "Cursed is everyone who does not continue in all things which are written in the book of the law, to do them."
11 But that no one is justified by the law in the sight of God is evident, for "the just shall live by faith."
12 Yet the law is not of faith, but "the man who does them shall live by them."
13 Christ has redeemed us from the curse of the law, having become a curse for us (for it is written, "Cursed is everyone who hangs on a tree"),
14 that the blessing of Abraham might come upon the Gentiles in Christ Jesus, that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith.


And so Paul challenges those who are oppressing fellow believers with the circumcision law:

Galatians 5:1-6
1 Stand fast therefore in the liberty by which Christ has made us free, and do not be entangled again with a yoke of bondage.
2 Indeed I, Paul, say to you that if you become circumcised, Christ will profit you nothing.
3 And I testify again to every man who becomes circumcised that he is a debtor to keep the whole law.
4 You have become estranged from Christ, you who attempt to be justified by law; you have fallen from grace.
5 For we through the Spirit eagerly wait for the hope of righteousness by faith.
6 For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor uncircumcision avails anything, but faith working through love.


Paul here describes adherence to the law as a "yoke of bondage" from which believers ought to be careful to remain free. He goes so far as to assert that any who get circumcised in an attempt to justify themselves before God estrange themselves from Christ who "redeemed them from the curse of the law." Strong words! Law and grace do not mix! Righteousness by faith and justification by works are anathema to one another! No amount of observance of the law can complete the perfect atoning work of Christ on the cross. But the legalist subtly denies this, insinuating the law back into Christian living, pressing believers to think that careful doing of it is necessary to salvation and a real relationship with God. Well, as Paul was wont to say, "God forbid!"

Selah.

May I ask, what is your definition of sin?
 
Upvote 0

1John2:4

Well-Known Member
Jun 8, 2016
1,204
361
48
New Braunfels, TX
✟40,108.00
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Private
Sins as a basis is what causes harm to another. It literally means to "miss the mark" . The cultural commands related to diet are addressed in the New Testament Passages, what matters is what happens on the inside of a person. Generally when laying down the law, whether it be dietary restrictions or transgressions related to grammEr, there is one sin underlying the discourse: The covetous need to control others.
.
The point of pointing out people's faults isn't to seem knowledgable in bible trivia, or the all powerful judgment police ... the basis is compassion. If it is a sin, the person is causing harm to themselves and others ... you do know that even stress is the cause of so many illnesses these days? and what causes stress more than anything? Control freaks ... that's why coveting to control your neighbour is a foundational sin, it leads to so much other trouble.

What is the biblical definition of sin?
Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law. 1 John 3:4 KJV Whoever commits sin also commits lawlessness, and sin is lawlessness. 1 John 3:4 NKJV Everyone who sins breaks the law; in fact, sin is lawlessness. 1 John 3:4 NIV

Strongs Greek
458
anomía (from 1 /A "not" and 3551 /nómos, "law") – properly, without law;

lawlessness; the utter disregard for God's law (His written and living Word).

458 /anomía ("lawlessness") includes the end-impact of law breaking – i.e. its negative influence on a person's soul (status before God).

Thayer's Greek Lexicon
STRONGS NT 458: ἀνομία

ἀνομία, ἀνομίας, ἡ (ἄνομος);
1. properly, the condition of one without law — either because ignorant of it, or because violating it.
2. contempt and violation of law, iniquity, wickedness: Matthew 23:28; Matthew 24:12; 2 Thessalonians 2:8 (T Tr text WH text; cf. ἁμαρτία, 1, p. 30f), 7; Titus 2:14; 1 John 3:4. opposed to ἡ δικαιοσύνη, 2 Corinthians 6:14; Hebrews 1:9 (not Tdf.) (Xenophon, mem. 1, 2, 24 ἀνομία μᾶλλον ἤ δικαιοσύνη χρώμενοι); and to ἡ δικαιοσύνη and ὁ ἁγιασμός, Romans 6:19 (τῇ ἀνομία εἰς τήν ἀνομίαν to iniquity — personified — in order to work iniquity); ποιεῖν τήν ἀνομίαν to do iniquity, act wickedly, Matthew 13:41; 1 John 3:4; in the same sense, ἐργάζεσθαι τήν ἀνομίαν, Matthew 7:23; plural αἱ ἀνομίαι manifestations of disregard for law, iniquities, evil deeds: Romans 4:7 (Psalm 31:1 ()); Hebrews 8:12 (R G L); Hebrews 10:17. (In Greek writings from (Herodotus 1, 96) Thucydides down; often in the Sept.) (Synonym: cf. Trench, § lxvi.; Tittm. 1:48; Ellicott on Titus 2:14.)
 
Upvote 0

faroukfarouk

Fading curmudgeon
Apr 29, 2009
35,915
17,131
Canada
✟287,108.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
The problem (besides people who want to be in God''s family being "grafted in,") is that very few people actually know if they are genetic Hebrews - and, therefore cannot use that argument.
It's all by faith in any case; Hebrews 11 keeps saying: 'By faith...by faith...by faith...'
 
Upvote 0

tatteredsoul

Well-Known Member
Feb 4, 2016
1,942
1,034
New York/Int'l
✟29,624.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Giving new laws would have been the same as changing
the old. It would have proclaimed him a false prophet and
he would have been killed for his own sin, not ours.

Excellent point, especially concerning so called doing away with law.
 
Upvote 0

expos4ever

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2008
11,248
6,240
Montreal, Quebec
✟301,985.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
You're equivocating here. Saying that the results of a righteous action can come to an end is not the same thing as saying that the is is possible that a righteous action might no longer be a righteous action in the future. So there might be some time in the future where helping to heal people is no longer a righteous action.
All I am doing is pointing out the flaw in reasoning thus:

1. God is holy, righteous, and unchanging;
2. The Law of Moses comes from God;
3. Therefore the Law of Moses has to be eternal.

There really should be no argument here: one cannot argue that just because the Law of Moses is the edict of an eternal, unchanging God this means that the Law of Moses can never be repealed. You are effectively denying God the "right" to do something holy and good for a limited period of time with a specific goal in mind.
 
Upvote 0

expos4ever

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2008
11,248
6,240
Montreal, Quebec
✟301,985.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
When you study under a tutor, the point where they are no longer needed is when you have taken their lessons to heart and act according to them. However, if after the tutor leaves you disregard everything they taught you about what to do, then then you would be missing the point of a tutor and and be showing that you need to go back under their tutelage.
Well, Paul says we are no longer under the tutor:

But now that faith has come, we are no longer under a tutor.

If we follow your reasoning, while honouring the clear logic of Paul's statement, we have to say that we put faith back on the shelf or otherwise concede that faith is ineffectual - Paul clearly has faith replacing the Law as tutor - and go back to the tutelage of the Law. Do you really want to have to own that position?
 
Upvote 0

1John2:4

Well-Known Member
Jun 8, 2016
1,204
361
48
New Braunfels, TX
✟40,108.00
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Private
It doesn't say they are set aside. Where in Scripture does it say that you don't have to obey the law of kings? I presume you are an American, and don't want to see a monarchy. Why not? The law of kings, given by Samuel, is also still in force.

The answer is that the law of kings was given by Samuel to Israel. And the Law of Moses was given by YHWH to Israel. Those laws are not just generic laws for mankind. They are actually not laws at all. They are, rather, terms of a binding contract between God, on the one hand, and a specifically defined set of people, on the other.

You're not part of that people, so none of the terms of that contract apply to you, or ever did apply to you.

Israel was strictly bounded. Farming rules for Israel don't work in Sweden. In fact, Eskimos cannot live if they don't eat animal fat - it is the bulk of their diet. What that means is NOT that people shouldn't be living in Arctic, for God commanded that men fill all of the land. What it means is that JEWS were never intended to live in the Arctic. They were intended to all live in Israel, where God's specific laws, for that climate in that particular land, were targeted.

Consider the counting of days by sunrises and sunsets. It is impossible to follow the Jewish calendar north of the Arctic Circle, in the land of the Midnight Sun, because the Summer Sabbath day lasts for six months, without sunset.

Those laws were not intended to limit where mankind can live. Those laws were only ever for Hebrews, living under God's rule specifically in Israel. And the Hebrews were all supposed to live THERE, forever (unless they broke the laws and were scattered with the destruction of Israel), so Hebrews were never supposed to be living in places where they couldn't keep the Sabbath. But there ARE places where the Sabbath cannot be kept: Northern Sweden, Finland, Norway, Russia, Canada, Alaska. It is impossible to keep the Sabbath in the land of the Midnight Sun. It is also impossible to keep the Jewish dietary laws. Which doesn't mean those natives who settled there, fulfilling the commandment to fill the land and subdue it, were in breach of "The Law" until Jesus. The Law of Moses never, ever, at any time before or after Jesus, applied to anybody but people living in Israel. That's it. That's all.

A Christian error is to see the Jewish law as having been "for them", and seeing Jesus as having "freed us from that law".
Paul seems to say that. But Paul WAS A JEW LIVING IN ISRAEL! And he was writing those things to Jews! JEWS had that issue to work out! If you're a JEW, do you still have to keep the Law of Moses? Judaizers said yes. Paul and the Apostles at Jerusalem said no.

The danger of just reading the Bible is that it's easy to think of one's self as being the target of the OT laws, and then seeing Jesus freeing us from those laws...or not. But that's a misread. The OT covenant at Sinai wasn't WITH us. It was with those Hebrews. We weren't FREED from that, because we were never under it in the first place. What WE are freed from is the fear of death, and we are given the certitude of life after death, and the promise of life with God in his City if we follow what Jesus said. That's the whole deal for us.

It's also the whole deal for Jews. All of that bit about the Law, and the anxieties about it, were JEWS (Paul, Peter, James, etc.) talking to Jews (the other apostles, and the early Christians) trying to figure out how as JEWS they were to deal with the Jewish Law.

GENTILES never had that anxiety. And Gentiles really err by reading Scripture simply and taking on that anxiety, or the belief that we are "freed" from a contract we were never a party too.

This seems to be controversial with a lot of people. But it's actually obvious if one really READS the text and sees to whom the covenant applies.

You have an interesting take on Alaskans and other people who live where it is night or day for an extended period of time, I have never considered that until you brought it up. However, they still have to work, I would assume and they are able to put in 8 hours of work and they can tell time? I don't think they only work when it is light out, then sleep when it is dark outside. If keeping Shabbat is that important to them I'm sure God will provide a way for them. I do believe that I belong to Israel, that I am part of the family, Yeshua (Jesus) stated that he came only for the lost sheep of Israel. Matthew 15:24 His sheep hear his voice John 10:27 I hope to be one of His sheep. I do believe we need to keep the commandments of God if we want to be part of the family. He is a God of order not chaos and confusion. His Laws for farming were more about loving the land and loving your animals, servants and brothers, He does not have laws specific to soil types for various regions. Its about being gentle to His creation not mass producing or giving into greed. That is a large part of what the Sabbath is about, not being greedy and working the land, people and animals to death. Its about love, all of His commandments and laws are about love. They are all for our own good, whether we understand it now or in the Kingdom, we still must repent when we break them because sin is breaking His law 1 John 3:4. They are all about how to love God and love others. Yeshua (Jesus) summed it up with 2 commandments, as you already know, to love God and to love others. I do not see His law as a burden or a curse that no one can keep, as some Christians believe. As you proclaimed we will all have to come before the judgment throne, and on that day I would too like to hear "Well done my good and faithful servant".
 
Upvote 0

Vicomte13

Well-Known Member
Jan 6, 2016
3,655
1,816
Westport, Connecticut
✟108,837.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
You have an interesting take on Alaskans and other people who live where it is night or day for an extended period of time, I have never considered that until you brought it up. However, they still have to work, I would assume and they are able to put in 8 hours of work and they can tell time? I don't think they only work when it is light out, then sleep when it is dark outside. If keeping Shabbat is that important to them I'm sure God will provide a way for them. I do believe that I belong to Israel, that I am part of the family, Yeshua (Jesus) stated that he came only for the lost sheep of Israel. Matthew 15:24 His sheep hear his voice John 10:27 I hope to be one of His sheep. I do believe we need to keep the commandments of God if we want to be part of the family. He is a God of order not chaos and confusion. His Laws for farming were more about loving the land and loving your animals, servants and brothers, He does not have laws specific to soil types for various regions. Its about being gentle to His creation not mass producing or giving into greed. That is a large part of what the Sabbath is about, not being greedy and working the land, people and animals to death. Its about love, all of His commandments and laws are about love. They are all for our own good, whether we understand it now or in the Kingdom, we still must repent when we break them because sin is breaking His law 1 John 3:4. They are all about how to love God and love others. Yeshua (Jesus) summed it up with 2 commandments, as you already know, to love God and to love others. I do not see His law as a burden or a curse that no one can keep, as some Christians believe. As you proclaimed we will all have to come before the judgment throne, and on that day I would too like to hear "Well done my good and faithful servant".

Well said. I am not an argumentative person at heart, and have no reason to argue with it. You obviously believe that, as a Christian, you are an Israelite, under the Sinai Covenant, and bound by those laws. I obviously don't believe that. We have our reasons. It does not offend me that you believe this, and I wish you the best of luck in doing so.

For my part, I know that those laws, of Israel, do not apply to me as law because they say right on their face the group to whom they apply, and I'm not among them. I also recognize that God was getting at something under that law. Jesus explained that the summary of that law was "Love your neighbor as yourself, and love God above all". When I read the Hebrew Law in that light, things like those you mentioned come forward: the purpose of the sabbaths - to give rest to man, animal and the land. But if those things are actually binding LAW for Christians, then no Christian should ever work in the financial industry, nor ever invest in bonds or put money in the bank - for the charging of interest on loans is sin. And of course Christians and Jews should be univocally calling for the complete wiping out of all debt - private and public - every seven years, and the freeing of all prisoners every 50 years. Debt cancellation, and the freedom of people from all debt obligations to one another, and from criminal liability also - the wiping clean of the slate in the Jubilee - is absolutely central and fundamental to God's law of Israel. IT, in particular, is something that God speaks of being violated again and again through the prophets. God never mentions the trimming of beards things again. What he harangues the Hebrews for through the prophets are three things: The charging of interest on debts and the failure to wipe out debts without further consequences every seven years, the failure to keep the sabbaths, and the failure (of the Northern Kingdom) to limit their religious services exclusively to the hands of the Levitical priests, and the insistence of the Northern Kingdom of local sacrifices.

I have seen Christians criticize, even berate other Christians for not following the food laws, or for not keeping the Sabbaths, "because the Law..." I have never heard of a Christian movement, made of these Christians, insisting that mortgages be cancelled after 6 years, and all interest-bearing debt as an abomination to God. The Torah is chock full of the categorical, absolute prohibition on the charging or payment of interest on money that is lent between believers. To foreigners, yes. A Christian nation, if that really is the law, must issue Treasury Bonds at zero percent interest. Christians cannot invest their money at interest, but must instead loan it to poor people who ask, at zero percent interest, and they have to forgive the balance that is not paid back after seven years.

No Christian can take another Christian to court for failure to pay an interest debt - because the charging of interest is an abomination.

If the law is applied as read, that is what it says. I have never heard a single Christian who is willing to uphold the Sabbath and dietary system willing to uphold the extensive, mandatory financial and criminal justice system that God imposed on Israel also. Law is law, after all.

Now, for me, this is not a LEGAL problem, because it is clear to me from the very face of the written document that the Law of Moses, in its entirety, are merely articles of covenant in a contract between the Hebrews at Sinai and their circumcised lineal descendants, and YHWH. It is clear as a matter of law, as written, that that Law never was law for me, either before Sinai, or after Sinai, irrespective of whether Christ ever existed.

Just because the Law of Sinai is not LAW does not mean that it should not be taken very seriously. After all, God only set up one state in all of history that he ruled directly. He intended it for it to be successful and last forever. I think that those laws God imposed - for he did not leave the Hebrews with ANY legislature, so ALL of the law and regulation came from the mouth of God alone - were to make Israel ideal, and if followed, would have made Israel stand above all other nations, a model forever. So certainly I think that IF a state were really governed that way, it would end up being best (and probably favored by God).

BUT we are not held to that standard by God. For God only promised the circumcised lineal descendants of the Hebrews at Sinai that he would PROTECT their state under those laws. Only to them did he give the Urim and Thummim by which they could ALWAYS directly consult God for an answer to any hard judgment facing them.

Even if we follow all the laws by imitation, we do not, thereby, gain the guarantee of protection. Nor do we gaing the certitude of judgment, because we have not been given the Urim and Thummim.

God imposed a year-long agricultural sabbath every seven years. Which meant that after harvest in the sixth year, there would be no planting again until the eighth year. For two full years the Israelites would have to live off stores and gleanings. And in the Jubilee year, the fiftieth year, a SECOND consecutive Sabbath of the land commenced, so the Hebrews had to live for three years, from the end of harvest in the 48th year until the harvest in the 51st year, before planting anything. They had to live off stores and whatever God gave them naturally in the land.

They relied on God to always provide bountiful crops every six years, and especially bountiful ones in the 48th year (for the 49th year was a sabbatical year, and the 50th was the second sabbath, of the Jubilee. God promised them that, if they followed the law, he would never send a famine or a crop failure in those years, and that he would always provide bounty in the 51st year. Always. God promised that the weather would be grand every 7 years, and every 48 and 51 years.

God never promised us that. Even if we follow all of the Laws of Torah, we are not Hebrews under the promise, and we cannot rely on God to provide us enough food for us to grow and harvest NOTHING every 7 years, and to grow and harvest nothing in the 49th or 50th year. God did not promise that, and there is no reason at all to believe that if the Swedes went and did that, that God would be BOUND to provide them the miracle of guaranteed good weather and bumper crops every 7 years.

In fact, Jesus warned us not to put God to the test. The Gospel of Jesus and the promises of the New Covenant simply are not of this world. The Torah is very much of this world. It never even HINTS at life after death, judgment, the City of God and the Lake of Fire. None of that. It is about material prosperity and happiness in a specific exemplary state in this life, thanks to obedience to God, for a people selected by God to exhibit that. The Gospel, by contrast, promises material hardship and suffering in this life, with the greatest rewards in the next life going to the penurious faithful. There is nothing in the Gospel about peoples and nations and governments. Just as the Torah is ENTIRELY earth focused, the goal of the Gospel is ENTIRELY afterlife focused. Jesus promises hardship in the world, and reward in the next. YHWH promises Hebrews, only, prosperity and peace and victory in this world, and he never mentions that there IS a next world.

So, should we try to bring about God's government for Israel - his economic, judicial and ritual worship system - all across the world?

That is what the Messianics and Judaizers are saying, though they don't seem to realize it. They are very impressed by all of that writing and "Law" of the Old Testament, and think that it must be applied to people today, that that's what God wants.

My problem with that whole line of thinking is that it is not true. God is always very clear about what he wants. He said what he wanted of Noah. He said what he wanted of Abraham and of Hagar also. He said what he wanted of Jacob. He said what he wanted of Moses and the Hebrews. And these were all different things, specific things. God gave Noah (and mankind) ALL animals to eat. He didn't promise they would be good for them, only that it was not a sin to eat them.

God did not make certain animals sinful for Abraham, Isaac and Jacob either. What did Abraham serve God and his angels? He served them meat and curds - meat and milk - an ABOMINATION under the Law of Moses! God and the angels ate the abomination. Was it abominable? NO! Because God hadn't made that law yet, and Abraham wasn't a Hebrew under that Law.

Jesus struck down the dietary laws for the New Covenant both when he lived, and when he lowered the sheet full of unclean animals to Peter before Peter went and baptized uncircumcised Gentile Romans - a warrior and his whole family (presumably including children). God told Peter to eat the unclean animals, and told him three times to not call unclean what God has made clean.

Now, I see Christians who really want to keep the Jewish law say that this had nothing to do with food. That is not true. It obviously has to do with food. It self-evidently, from the acts and the words, is all about God COMMANDING Peter to do what is forbidden under the Mosaic law, to eat "unclean" foods - foods that Jesus MADE clean - specifically to overtly demonstrate that he, as a Christian now, WAS NOT TO OBEY the old Mosaic Law wherever it departed from the Law of Jesus. And Peter was a Jew, so he WAS under the covenant.

So, when it comes down to it, the Law of Moses is not law at all, not for us. But it is still instructive. It still shows us how to bend our minds. And one of the most important things that it does is tell us how we should be spending our money, and how we should not be investing it.
 
Upvote 0

Vicomte13

Well-Known Member
Jan 6, 2016
3,655
1,816
Westport, Connecticut
✟108,837.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
If keeping Shabbat is that important to them I'm sure God will provide a way for them.
He does not.

Sabbath, as defined in Scripture, begins at sundown, and ends at the next sundown. That is Sabbath. That is God's Word.

Men have provided a way for Jews to keep Sabbath, by choosing arbitrary times and keeping track.

Given that Jews were all supposed to be living in Israel anyway, were God's law followed meticulously, the situation could never arise, because no Jews should ever be living anywhere but in the land allotted to them, which is Israel. There never should be a Jew in the Arctic having to figure out Sabbath rules where there are days and nights that are 4 months long.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.