• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Why I Think Christmas is Not Biblical (Please read OP before posting).

ArmenianJohn

Politically Liberal Christian Fundamentalist
Jan 30, 2013
8,962
5,551
New Jersey (NYC Metro)
✟205,252.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Didn't say it was his birthdate. That is unknown. That's the traditional Christmas date.
 
Reactions: Ken Rank
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,127
33,263
✟584,002.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Technically, that is most likely so. But since we do not know -- and cannot know -- the actual date, it is understandable how the early Christians thought the legend of Christ being executed on the anniversary of the date of his conception was as good a guide to a selection of days for holding the commemoration as anything.
 
Reactions: Kerensa
Upvote 0

Ken Rank

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 12, 2014
7,222
5,564
Winchester, KENtucky
✟331,515.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
First of all, that is the modern definition of the word. And Albion, I use that definition just as anyone else does. My point in sharing the Thayer and Liddell-Scott definitions (force being #1) was to let Jason know that him pushing his view about Christmas on Christians can be a form of heresy. It is one thing to make your understanding known... it is another to continue to "push" your view on another... pushing is force. His position that Christians are basically in sin for celebrating messiah's birth in December and then pushing that on them robing them of that joy and time with their own God... is wrong. That's why I took a moment to define heresy as it was understood 2000 years ago.

The heretics of long ago weren't the ones losing their heads, they were the ones with the axes!
 
Reactions: aiki
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,550
28,531
74
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,300.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Ahhh, thanks for that clarification.
Perhaps you are referring to the derivative of #138---#726?


139. hairesis hah'-ee-res-is from 138;
properly, a choice, i.e. (specially) a party or (abstractly) disunion:--heresy (which is the Greek word itself), sect.
138. haireomai hahee-reh'-om-ahee probably akin to 142; to take for oneself, i.e. to prefer:--choose. Some of the forms are borrowed from a cognate hellomai hel'-lom-ahee; which is otherwise obsolete.
726. harpazo from a derivative of 138;
to seize (in various applications):--catch (away, up), pluck, pull, take (by force).

The violent ones could still be symbolizing the corrupt murderous Judean Rulers?

Matthew 11:12
“And from the days of John the Baptist until now the kingdom of the heavens is being violently-forced<971>, and the violent<973> take it by force<726>.
Luke 16:16
“The law and the prophets were until John.
from then the kingdom of the God is being evangelized and every-one into it is violently-forcing<971> and violent-ones<973> are forcefully-taking<726> it
 
Upvote 0

ArmenianJohn

Politically Liberal Christian Fundamentalist
Jan 30, 2013
8,962
5,551
New Jersey (NYC Metro)
✟205,252.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Important Note:
(Please read this before posting and or reading the rest of my OP):
One other thing: The problem(s) with Christmas aren't in the holiday itself. The holiday itself is a simple remembrance/celebration of Christ's Nativity which is central to Christianity. Nothing at all wrong with that. The fact that The Nativity is central to Christianity IS Biblical.

The real problem that you should have with Christmas is how evil countries like America have turned it into a mammon-worship holiday. There's the crime, there's the sin. And I'm not even saying you can't have gifts, Christmas trees, etc. I'm saying that as a culture those things replace Christ and that is sin, and on a family/individual level you can't let those things replace Christ in Christmas.

The thing I see is a lot of Christmas-hating Christians (like yourself) usually also happen to be huge "patriots", which is just another term for America-worshipers.
 
Reactions: Not David
Upvote 0

Ken Rank

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 12, 2014
7,222
5,564
Winchester, KENtucky
✟331,515.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
What is most likely, Passover? It might be.... but since Elizabeth's husband was a priest in the order of Abijah, and that order served twice a year at a set time... then since we know Elizabeth became pregnant when he came out of his time of service, and since we know how far along Elizabeth was and Mary was when Mary came to visit... then it is simple math that puts a delivery date anywhere from late August to the first week of October... depending on how the Hebrew calendar (which at that time was observed, not calculated) coincided that year. Now, that is based on her getting pregnant after his first time of service. If the 2nd... then we can argue Passover instead of Tabernacles. But it is one or the other and >>NOBODY<< knows with 100% certainty which. What we do know is that is wasn't in the winter.

Blessings.
Ken
 
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,127
33,263
✟584,002.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
First of all, that is the modern definition of the word.

My comments were based on the apparent connection or similarity between the original and the modern usage.

I see. But would that be a heresy in the religious sense (which would be the only sense to matter in this case) or just something else that's unacceptable, wrong, improper, etc.?

No need to reply. I'm just thinking aloud.
 
Reactions: Ken Rank
Upvote 0

No Swansong

Formerly Jtbdad Christian on every board!
Apr 14, 2004
11,548
658
Ohio
✟43,633.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Green
I think all Christians should not celebrate it for biblical reasons. That is why I had written a well thought treatise with Scripture for you to read or check out. If you do not want to hear it, then this thread is not for you then.
It's not that I didn't want to hear it it's that I am not convinced by your argumentation,nor do I believe that the limitations you put upon yourself applicable to others
 
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,127
33,263
✟584,002.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Most of us know that the date chosen is arbitrary, don't we? And it has to be so, as you just explained here.
 
Reactions: Kerensa
Upvote 0

drich0150

Regular Member
Mar 16, 2008
6,407
437
Florida
✟59,834.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I am a thess 5:21 man myself and I have lived by that verse for as long as I can remember. I tell people it means not only to question the questionable but to also question the foundational... Which means we must look at what we believe just as hard as we would what someone is telling us.

That said I have gone down this very same path and came to similar conclusions... but then applied thess 5:21 to my conclusions which is where it seems you have stopped.

meaning now that i discovered that dec 25 and 'christmas' was not a biblical holiday, I asked was it wrong to partake in it or share it as it is being shared? the bible does indeed have an answer to this and that is it is completely ok to celebrate Christmas! turn to romans 14 really the whole chapter point at this but more specifically: 5 One person considers one day to be more holy than another. Another person thinks all days are the same. Each of them should be absolutely sure in their own mind. 6 Whoever thinks that one day is special does so to honor the Lord. Whoever eats meat does so to honor the Lord. They give thanks to God. And whoever doesn’t eat meat does so to honor the Lord. They also give thanks to God. 7 We don’t live for ourselves only. And we don’t die for ourselves only. 8 If we live, we live to honor the Lord. If we die, we die to honor the Lord. So whether we live or die, we belong to the Lord. 9 Christ died and came back to life. He did this to become the Lord of both the dead and the living.

So if I think Christmas is holy then to me it is, and it has God's stamp of approval as well, just like if I think the sabbath is not but all days are equal and I give all days to the lord I am no longer bound by the sabbath rules.
 
Upvote 0

Not David

Antiochian Orthodox
Apr 6, 2018
7,393
5,278
26
USA
✟243,137.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
You give really good points most of the time Jason, but do you really think switching letters with one's name is a symbol of the devil?
Also, you said that we don't care about the resurrection but the Birth, but I guess Matthew and Luke should have omitted that and they are making others stumble by mentioning his birth.
 
Reactions: Ken Rank
Upvote 0

Kerensa

Well-Known Member
Apr 20, 2017
750
910
Kent
✟110,891.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Christmas itself is a holiday that does not teach the resurrection of Jesus Christ. Others may do so, but the holiday itself does not do so.

There are quite a few Christmas carols, old and new, that do point to Jesus' crucifixion and resurrection. But regardless of that, why not celebrate his birth, the Incarnation? If he hadn't been born on earth in the first place, there would have been no resurrection either... (Incidentally, while the Bible certainly shows the apostles preaching the resurrection of Jesus, nowhere does it say that we need to commemorate that event on its anniversary (or thereabouts) with a festival. I hope, for consistency's sake, that you're also against celebrating Easter.)

So if you knew no other Christians and you did not investigate Christianity outside of Christmas, you would never truly know about a risen Lord. Therein is the problem with Christmas.

No it's not — another non sequitur. If someone who's not a Christian is nevertheless drawn to the story of Jesus' birth and wants to find out more about why this baby in a manger was/is special, he or she will naturally learn about the resurrection pretty quickly. Christmas is not stopping anyone from doing that. It is quite possibly pointing them to it. It did for me as a child, even in a very secular family.

Honestly, the only "problems" with Christmas are the ones you are making with it. Going by what you've been posting, it seems it's only in the past few days that you've been doing some research and come to the conclusion that Christmas is "wrong" and now you feel the need to tell everyone who celebrates it that they are wrong, over and over and over. Again, if you choose not to celebrate Christmas, that's fine. But to berate those who do choose to celebrate it, is not fine. Seriously, is this a matter of life and death? Is God going to send Christians to hell because they celebrate Christmas? If so, that's probably over 99% of us gone.
 
Upvote 0

Ken Rank

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 12, 2014
7,222
5,564
Winchester, KENtucky
✟331,515.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I see. But would that be a heresy in the religious sense (which would be the only sense to matter in this case) or just something else that's unacceptable, wrong, improper, etc.?

It is a word with many meanings. Clearly "sect" in Acts 15:5 (hairesis is the underlying Greek), a bad "choice" in Acts 24:14, but in this verse... I see information by force, manipulation:

2 Peter 2:1 But there were also false prophets among the people, even as there will be false teachers among you, who will secretly bring in destructive heresies, even denying the Lord who bought them, and bring on themselves swift destruction.
 
Upvote 0

Barney2.0

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Dec 1, 2017
6,003
2,336
Los Angeles
✟473,721.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Find me scripture that says we should only depend on scripture?
 
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,117
6,148
EST
✟1,123,613.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
This is what you claimed the pope's letter to Augustine said.
<Mal>Christmas is not Biblical, a little history lesson:
When the Catholic church of Rome was converting the Anglo-Saxons of England in 597AD, they sent a Saint Augustine. A letter from the Pope instructed him to use pagan rituals and holy days and convert them to Christian, to make the transition to Christianity easier. One such holy day was yule, which was the Anglo-Saxon pagan festival of the new year.

"Celebration of the Norse New Year; a festival of 12 nights. This is the most important of all the Norse holidays. On the night of December 20, the god Ingvi Freyr rides over the earth on the back of his shining boar, bringing Light and Love back into the World. In later years, after the influence of Christianity, the god Baldur, then Jesus, was reborn at this festival. Jul signifies the beginning and end of all things; the darkest time (shortest hour of daylight) during the year and the brightest hope re-entering the world. During this festival, the Wild Hunt is at its greatest fervor, and the dead are said to range the Earth in its retinue. The god Wotan (Odin) is the leader of this Wild Ride; charging across the sky on his eight-legged horse, Sleipnir; a very awe-inspiring vision. In ancient times, Germanic and Norse children would leave their boots out by the hearth on Solstice Eve, filled with hay and sugar, for Sleipnir's journey. In return, Wotan would leave them a gift for their kindness. In modern times, Sleipnir was changed to a reindeer and the grey-bearded Wotan became the kindly Santa Claus (Father Christmas)."<end>
Here is a copy of the actual letter nothing highlighted in red in the previous letter appears in the actual letter.
<MLK>A COPY OF THE LETTER WHICH POPE GREGORY SENT TO THE ABBOT MELLITUS, THEN GOING INTO BRITAIN. [A.D. 601.]
"To his most beloved son, the Abbot Mellitus; Gregory, the servant of the servants of God. We have been much concerned, since the departure of our congregation that is with you, because we have received no account of the success of your journey. When, therefore, Almighty God shall bring you to the most reverend Bishop Augustine, our brother, tell him what I have, upon mature deliberation on the affair of the English, determined upon, viz., that the temples of the idols in that nation ought not to be destroyed; but let the idols that are in them be destroyed; let holy water be made and sprinkled in the said temples, let altars be erected, and relics placed. For if those temples are well built, it is requisite that they be converted from the worship of devils to the service of the true God; that the nation, seeing that their temples are not destroyed, may remove error from their hearts, and knowing and adoring the true God, may the more familiarly resort to the places to which they have been accustomed. And because they have been used to slaughter many oxen in the sacrifices to devils, some solemnity must be exchanged for them on this account, as that on the day of the dedication, or the nativities of the holy martyrs, whose relics are there deposited, they may build themselves huts of the boughs of trees, about those churches which have been turned to that use from temples, and celebrate the solemnity with religious feasting, and no more offer beasts to the Devil, but kill cattle to the praise of God in their eating, and return thanks to the Giver of all things for their sustenance; to the end that, whilst some gratifications are outwardly permitted them, they may the more easily consent to the inward consolations of the grace of God. For there is no doubt that it is impossible to efface everything at once from their obdurate minds; because he who endeavours to ascend to the highest place, rises by degrees or steps, and not by leaps. Thus the Lord made Himself known to the people of Israel in Egypt; and yet He allowed them the use of the sacrifices which they were wont to offer to the Devil, in his own worship; so as to command them in his sacrifice to kill beasts, to the end that, changing their hearts, they might lay aside one part of the sacrifice, whilst they retained another; that whilst they offered the same beasts which they were wont to offer, they should offer them to God, and not to idols; and thus they would no longer be the same sacrifices. This it behooves your affection to communicate to our aforesaid brother, that he, being there present, may consider how he is to order all things. God preserve you in safety, most beloved son. Given the 17th of June, in the nineteenth year of the reign of our lord, the most pious emperor, Mauritius Tiberius, the eighteenth year after the consulship of our said lord. The fourth indiction."<end>
Apparently the most questionable thing that the pope said in the letter was let the Anglo-Saxons retain the pagan temples but destroy the idols.
 
Reactions: Barney2.0
Upvote 0

Not David

Antiochian Orthodox
Apr 6, 2018
7,393
5,278
26
USA
✟243,137.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Wait, so the letter was falsified in order to make Christmas seem pagan?
 
Upvote 0

FireDragon76

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 30, 2013
33,490
20,776
Orlando, Florida
✟1,516,627.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Neither is celebrating the Resurrection yearly or any of the other things done around the year by the church in the Bible. But that doesn't mean the early Christians didn't do them.

We Lutherans don't consider it a sin exactly if Christians don't celebrate Easter or Christmas on the dates we do, or in the way we do, but it is wrong to say that the Church has no authority to institute rites or ceremonies of its own, merely because there is no explicit biblical command to do so.
 
Upvote 0

Invalidusername

Well-Known Member
May 11, 2018
1,373
662
Battle Creek
✟77,701.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican

I like your approach. I do get a bad vibe from Jason's posts. Almost like pride is oozing through his posts and he enjoys the conflict/strife this thread brings.
 
Upvote 0

Kaon

Well-Known Member
Mar 12, 2018
5,676
2,350
Los Angeles
✟111,517.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Celibate

I never said Christians deify the sun; I said people were deifying hundreds of years before the Redeemer came as a Son of Man - specifically on December 25 (more or less), distorting astronomy into astrology and associating this astronomical event with a deity. Why even associate with a pagan celebration in the first place? It isn't our job to change dark to light. Out of all of the holy days that the Word of God Himself, and the Most High God listed (ones we blithely ignore), where did the Word of God ever say to celebrate His birthday?

When did He ever tell us, or His disciples His birth day? Mithraism celebrated their sun god born of a virgin on the 25th of December since 1400bc (on record). Christians often have to apologize for this...issue, because the Church has been lazy in their disdain for paganism and idolatry. But His birth isn't the important part; we have know He would be born since Adam. But, this hijacking of prophecy has been happening since the beginning (which is why the "oldest record" issue is comical when terming what is oldest ever).

There is also nothing Hebrew, or Christian about decking a pyramidal wintergreen for the purposes of celebrating the Redeemer. There is nothing about putting a star (Sol) at the top, or giving gifts related to the birth of Christ; the Wise/Magi brought gifts to the Redeemer after he was already born and breathing for a while. The connections are distorted, because they were a combination of pagan and Christian ideas. Instead of completely rending Rome through religious upheaval, it was better to combine the holidays of all cultures and celebrate days together - as a nation.


As someone in this thread has already said, the focus of Christmas isn't about the resurrection - it is about the birth of Christ. Is it the culture of the Hebrews to celebrate their birthdays? And, the holy day is completely commercialized and full of idolatry for a reason; Passover, Unleavened Bread, Firstfruits, Pentecost, Trumpets, Atonement, and/or Sukkot are not commercialized for a reason. All of the holy days the Most High listed for us are in the spring, or fall. None are in the winter. The activities of Christ happen in the spring (Sacrifice and Resurrection) and fall (Judgement and the Wedding); not the winter.
 
Upvote 0

Not David

Antiochian Orthodox
Apr 6, 2018
7,393
5,278
26
USA
✟243,137.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Most of the stuff you said is taken for the Anti-Christian Christ Myth Theory that everything related Christianity is a rip off from pagan myths.
Also, we aren't Jews but Christians, and they deny Christ so what does it matter?
 
Reactions: Eloy Craft
Upvote 0