C
Critias
Guest
If no man was there at creation, no man can ever be 100% certain that it happened as they assert it did, either creation or evolution/abiogenesis/big bang.
If God created in six days then common descent would be falsified. The current teaching of the big bang is over a course of time longer than six days, so if a six day creation is right, that wouldn't fit as it is. Abiogenesis would be falsified because God created Adam and the six day. Adam's body, not yet living was created from the dirt, hence non-life to life would be incorrect. It was God would breathed life into Adam not the dirt that gave Adam life.
But, these are things, some maybe not all, that you believe to be true: evolution, common descent, abiogenesis, big bang. I haven't seen you comment on them all so I don't know if you subscribe to them all, I just put them there for clarification of what I am speaking of.
You believe they are true because of the interpretations given by scientists of the evidence that they have studied, correct?
Your belief in origins extends beyond just God creating and into how God created. It is not just a logical conclusion it is also a belief. Unless you have done all the research yourself, been in the labs, doing the experiments, etc then it is a belief in what others within science assert.
I know this is very hard for many TEs to grasp, that if they haven't done the work but still hold the belief that it is a belief. I can do as you and study science all my life and yet if I have not done the research, experiments, etc it is still a belief in what the scientists say. You are believing what they say is correct and will be correct for time to come.
I believe also that God created knowledge so that we can comprehend what He has done. I also believe that man has used knowledge in a way that it was not intended to be used. Just because God created something, doesn't automatically mean man will use it as God wishes her/him to do.
Collective knowledge can be just as deceitful. Because God created it, doesn't mean it is impervious to being misused.
I do not contend for you to deny anything. I don't wish to impose on your free choice. I am just interested in a discussion. I have not accusations to make at you, are to call you names, as I have received from several TEs here.
I just want to see TEs support their assertions about Genesis being a type of writing. In my responses to you, i have shown my I see it as I do, and you have been gracious enough to explain how you can see it as you do. Thank you for that!
We may disgree, but at least we were able to discuss it without the accusations and name calling so prevelant here.
If God created in six days then common descent would be falsified. The current teaching of the big bang is over a course of time longer than six days, so if a six day creation is right, that wouldn't fit as it is. Abiogenesis would be falsified because God created Adam and the six day. Adam's body, not yet living was created from the dirt, hence non-life to life would be incorrect. It was God would breathed life into Adam not the dirt that gave Adam life.
But, these are things, some maybe not all, that you believe to be true: evolution, common descent, abiogenesis, big bang. I haven't seen you comment on them all so I don't know if you subscribe to them all, I just put them there for clarification of what I am speaking of.
You believe they are true because of the interpretations given by scientists of the evidence that they have studied, correct?
Your belief in origins extends beyond just God creating and into how God created. It is not just a logical conclusion it is also a belief. Unless you have done all the research yourself, been in the labs, doing the experiments, etc then it is a belief in what others within science assert.
I know this is very hard for many TEs to grasp, that if they haven't done the work but still hold the belief that it is a belief. I can do as you and study science all my life and yet if I have not done the research, experiments, etc it is still a belief in what the scientists say. You are believing what they say is correct and will be correct for time to come.
I believe also that God created knowledge so that we can comprehend what He has done. I also believe that man has used knowledge in a way that it was not intended to be used. Just because God created something, doesn't automatically mean man will use it as God wishes her/him to do.
Collective knowledge can be just as deceitful. Because God created it, doesn't mean it is impervious to being misused.
I do not contend for you to deny anything. I don't wish to impose on your free choice. I am just interested in a discussion. I have not accusations to make at you, are to call you names, as I have received from several TEs here.
I just want to see TEs support their assertions about Genesis being a type of writing. In my responses to you, i have shown my I see it as I do, and you have been gracious enough to explain how you can see it as you do. Thank you for that!
We may disgree, but at least we were able to discuss it without the accusations and name calling so prevelant here.
Upvote
0