• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Why evolution isn't scientific

Status
Not open for further replies.

the iconoclast

Atheism is weak. Yep, I said it
Feb 10, 2015
1,130
81
✟39,361.00
Country
Burkina Faso
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Private
I dont care about your feelings one way

Hi champ

So you are a nihilist who does not care?

Im a Pentecostal christian. What type of nihilist are you?

or the other or who is smarter.

Optimus - "I think denying physical reality like you do is stupid and ignorant."

You accept ToE as a physical reality therefore you are not stupid or ignorant. Why did you feel the need to make that statement?

The ToE is incredibly well-supported science that describes physical reality.

So the ToE is supported by much evidence. Nice, what specific evidence convinces you? One example should do for now.

My response is in no way incompatible with Kylies answer.

Cool.

So evolution is not meaningless?

The ToE just is.

Interesting reply. So you dont question ToE, it just is?

Cheers you marvel
 
Upvote 0

DogmaHunter

Code Monkey
Jan 26, 2014
16,757
8,531
Antwerp
✟158,395.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
So the ToE is supported by much evidence. Nice, what specific evidence convinces you? One example should do for now.

Phylogenetic trees; the nested hierarchy of all living things.

To be fair, that's not "one" example... it's rather a set of ALL morphological, genetic and fossil data mapped out on a gigantic graph. You can also add geographic distribution to that and the converging timelines of geological tectonic activity (ie: why you only find kangaroos in australia).

All those sets of data converge on the exact same phylogenetic tree, which is the result of common ancestry of species and divergence by process of biological evolution.

It's pretty overwhelming how all independent sets of data converge on the exact same answer of evolution. So overwhelming that nobody in his right mind and aware of these sets of evidence, can logically or rationally deny it.

So evolution is not meaningless?

It's a process that happens. It's as meaningfull/less as water freezing into water or h2o forming out of h and o under specific circumstances.

Interesting reply. So you dont question ToE, it just is?
I question the reality of evolution about as much as the reality of germs or atoms.
 
Reactions: Astrophile
Upvote 0

VirOptimus

A nihilist who cares.
Aug 24, 2005
6,814
4,422
54
✟258,187.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married

As you cant post like a grownup this conversation is over.
 
Upvote 0

xianghua

Well-Known Member
Feb 14, 2017
5,215
555
44
tel aviv
✟119,055.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Single
so what? its still a peer review paper that support id. and i can give you many others.
 
Upvote 0

xianghua

Well-Known Member
Feb 14, 2017
5,215
555
44
tel aviv
✟119,055.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Single
a cartoon? so there is no such a thing as flagellum motor?
 
Upvote 0

xianghua

Well-Known Member
Feb 14, 2017
5,215
555
44
tel aviv
✟119,055.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Single
All the change does is show that there is a group of later transitional fossils between fishes and terapods and there are earlier ones to be found.

no. its only show that evolution is a non scientific belief. but you are welcome to believe anything you want.
 
Upvote 0

xianghua

Well-Known Member
Feb 14, 2017
5,215
555
44
tel aviv
✟119,055.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Single
you realy give me a review of non scientific article (an evolutionery blog) against a scientific paper? this is a joke or something?
 
Upvote 0

DogmaHunter

Code Monkey
Jan 26, 2014
16,757
8,531
Antwerp
✟158,395.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
so if we will find evidence for a 100 my old dolphin fossil it will be ok with evolution too?

No.

But you don't have such evidence, do you?

One can count on @xianghua to argue against reality by pointing to imaginary evidence.
 
Upvote 0

Warden_of_the_Storm

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2015
15,185
7,496
31
Wales
✟427,173.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single
so if we will find evidence for a 100 my old dolphin fossil it will be ok with evolution too?

Only if there if is evidence that there is a lineage of dolphin evolution going back that far. Finding a modern day dolphin fossil in 100 million year old sediment will wreck the theory of evolution.
Do you understand this?
 
Reactions: Astrophile
Upvote 0

Warden_of_the_Storm

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2015
15,185
7,496
31
Wales
✟427,173.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single
so what? its still a peer review paper that support id. and i can give you many others.

Except it's not. The editor's comment clearly says that it's merely a think piece. Nothing more.
 
Upvote 0
Oct 15, 2012
3,826
844
✟135,483.00
Faith
Atheist
so what? its still a peer review paper that support id. and i can give you many others.
You are wrong, xianghua.
There are ID papers that are pathetic attacks on evolution and do not support ID. There is no paper that shows that there is design in any living organization except in the author's imagination as in the paper you cited. There are not "many" papers about ID at all. Read the list you gave us. At best there are 13 papers as opposed to the vast number of papers about evolution. And those ID papers stop in 2013 !
 
Upvote 0
Oct 15, 2012
3,826
844
✟135,483.00
Faith
Atheist
a cartoon? so there is no such a thing as flagellum motor?
Read my post. There is a designed to look like a motor cartoon. There is no motor as in a designed car engine. There is a group of evolved protein molecules that function as a motor and used to have another function.
 
Upvote 0
Oct 15, 2012
3,826
844
✟135,483.00
Faith
Atheist
you realy give me a review of non scientific article (an evolutionery blog) against a scientific paper?
You missed the point, xianghua. You made yet another error.
A citation of the ignorant Stephen Meyer of the creationist Discovery Institute rather pathetically stating that the evolution cannot work (fallacy of false dichotomy), not a peer reviewed paper on ID.

Look at the actual contents of the paper. Meyer's Hopeless Monster

That the paper is obviously wrong to people who have learned biology is a different matter.
Peer-reviewed paper defends theory of intelligent design is a Nature news article dubious about the paper. Meyer's Hopeless Monster lists errors obvious to anyone who knows biology in the paper.

The citation was the ignorant Stephen Meyer of the creationist Discovery Institute being obviously wrong about biology as listed by Alan Gishlick, Nick Matzke, and Wesley R. Elsberry.

The citation of not even a peer reviewed paper by the ignorant Stephen Meyer of the creationist Discovery Institute - this was published in a conference proceedings !
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

the iconoclast

Atheism is weak. Yep, I said it
Feb 10, 2015
1,130
81
✟39,361.00
Country
Burkina Faso
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Private
As you cant post like a grownup this conversation is over.

Hey hey he who cares.

Dont worry dogmahunter answered your post for you. The conversation will continue with him, unfortunately you dont seem to have anything to offer.

Cheers
 
Upvote 0

DogmaHunter

Code Monkey
Jan 26, 2014
16,757
8,531
Antwerp
✟158,395.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Hey hey he who cares.
Dont worry dogmahunter answered your post for you. The conversation will continue with him,

Only on condition that you start posting like an adult.
 
Upvote 0

the iconoclast

Atheism is weak. Yep, I said it
Feb 10, 2015
1,130
81
✟39,361.00
Country
Burkina Faso
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Private
Hebrews 4:12 ESV

For the word of God is living and active, sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing to the division of soul and of spirit, of joints and of marrow, and discerning the thoughts and intentions of the heart.







Hey hey dhunter

Because faith doesn't lead to truth.

You can believe anything on faith, no matter if it's right or wrong..

No matter if its right or wrong... that is a curious detail.

Complete trust or confidence in someone or something - they/it could be correct or incorrect.

So i guess the next step would be to determine if this someone or something is wrong or right - or for a better term - true or false. How would you go about verifying the truth - or falsehood - about the below statement? Or would you like me to examine it?

"You can have a personal relationship with God through Jesus Christ."

Faith, is what you need when you have no evidence but wish to believe anyway.

Well lets look at what the standard definition is. I refer to google and wiki

Faith is a complete trust or confidence in someone or something or a strong belief in the doctrines of a religion, based on spiritual conviction rather than proof.

Wiki on faith.

In the context of religion, one can define faith as confidence or trust in a particular system of religious belief,

[1] within which faith may equate to confidence based on some perceived degree of warrant,

[2]in contrast to a definition of faith as being belief without evidence.

The word translated as "faith" in the New Testament is the Greek word πίστις (pístis) which can also be translated "belief", "faithfulness", and "trust".

Hebrews 11:1
"Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen."

Faith in the unseen leads to the proof of God - ask me?

Lets say your child - congratulations by the way - did not know any better and you were trying to explain a more advanced concept to them. If this concept is not understood it could be fatal for the recipient. Why would the child be unjustified to have faith in what you say and acknowledge what you said is truth?

Why do not check the durability of a seat everytime you sit down?

We go to doctors because it has been observed that many people have been remedied of their illnesses. Now this is not faith without evidence, this is a case of trust. We put our trust in the doctor ie faith.

Besides religion, have you ever encountered a situation where you could not see the outcome or situation, and had to trust someones word for it or decision?

Faith can not distinguish accurate beliefs from wrong beliefs.

Faith can be justified by a result either observed or experienced personally.

Faith, is gullibility.

Faith is trust. You have a faith, it is in the conclusions and thoughts of men who reason with facts, and observations. The same men who you believe are extremely prone to error, who are judged by men who are extremely prone to error.

At the end of the day neither you and i can know everything or have the data so we will have to accept an appeal to authority. Dont kid yourself my dear, you are not a free thinker!

Why do you accept the thoughts and conclusions of men who are extremely prone to error? Why are they more convincing than Christianity?


A phylogenetic tree or evolutionary tree is a branching diagram or "tree" showing the evolutionary relationships among various biological species or other entities—their phylogeny (/faɪˈlɒdʒəni/)

Please excuse me. This diagram is not a form of proof! Why should i be convinced of evolution based on this artwork?


Have you got anything else?
Ps one at a time

All those sets of data converge on the exact same phylogenetic tree, which is the result of common ancestry of species and divergence by process of biological evolution.

Well i guess its my time to shine. Could you please give me an example of how this is so?

It's pretty overwhelming how all independent sets of data converge on the exact same answer of evolution. So overwhelming that nobody in his right mind and aware of these sets of evidence, can logically or rationally deny it.

In other words "there must be something wrong with you if you question it". Why should we not question evolution, what makes it so concrete that it is absolutely certain?

It's a process that happens. It's as meaningfull/less as water freezing into water or h2o forming out of h and o under specific circumstances.

So evolution is a series of actions or steps taken in order to achieve a particular end or a natural series of changes. How do you account for so much diversity considering we have only a one single celled organism as our ancestor?

I question the reality of evolution about as much as the reality of germs or atoms.

There you have it peoples Dogmahunter has a dogma and a faith. Evolution is incontrovertibly true he does not question it.

Cheers. I look forward to your reply
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.