I will answer that when you answer my question which you have ignored. Do you agree we cannot push back evolution without evidence?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I will answer that when you answer my question which you have ignored. Do you agree we cannot push back evolution without evidence?so if in the future we will find a 50 my old bear fossil you will agree that we can push back bear evolution. right?
sure. its a theoretical scenario to test evolution claims. can you answer my question now?I will answer that when you answer my question which you have ignored. Do you agree we cannot push back evolution without evidence?
but what is a "modern day"? where you put the limit between modern snake and a primitive one?
sure. its a theoretical scenario to test evolution claims. can you answer my question now?
You haven't answered my question. Do we need evidence, yes or no?sure. its a theoretical scenario to test evolution claims. can you answer my question now?
but i alrleady showed that we do find more modern forms before primitive one. again take a look at this figure:... okay, that one stumped me. Maybe using modern day wasn't the best for snakes, since what we recognise as 'modern' snakes appear in the Late Cretaceous period. But a clear example of a primitive snake would be a snake that clearly shows the limbs that earlier forms possessed.
But, getting back to the original point, and one you have clearly tried to ignore; a scientist finding a bear, like a Kodiak Bear, fossil in a sedimentary layer older than sediment that would contain a primitive bear fossil would be a problem. But we don't see that.
You said sure, it's theoretical.i said yes.
but i alrleady showed that we do find more modern forms before primitive one. again take a look at this figure:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipe...e_tracks_vs_selected_Devonian_fossils.svg.png
so its clearly not true that its impossible for evolution to find a more modern form before more primitive one.
its a test since we need to predict what we will find or not in the future.You said sure, it's theoretical.
If we agree that we need evidence, then we can dismiss your theoretical test as it has no evidence. It is not a test.
its a test since we need to predict what we will find or not in the future.
what? the tetrapod track fossil predate these missing links between fish and tetrapod. so this fossil is more modern then these fishes and yet it appeare earlier.Let's show this with a LARGER scale since both your examples are far too small to see.
Question for you: do you have any idea what the phrase 'divergent evolution' means? Because that pic ^ shows absolutely NOTHING of what you are saying.
if so evolution predict nothing and therefore its not scientific.It's not a test in any way shape or form.
what? the tetrapod track fossil predate these missing links between fish and tetrapod. so this fossil is more modern then these fishes and yet it appeare earlier.
if so evolution predict nothing and therefore its not scientific.
what do you mean by that?You realise they're going BACKWARDS from the figure in the bottom left of the picture, right?
what do you mean by that?
It is neither a test nor a prediction.its a test since we need to predict what we will find or not in the future.
so we both agree that 200 my old bear fossil is ok with evolution.
this is what she said: "You can push it by as much as you want". even if she was joking it doesnt change the fact that we can push any creature by finding a new fossil. this fact alone prove that the creature evolution can be change by fossils and therefore there is no such a thing as "out of place fossil".
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?