Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Scientists are capable of fraud. That's true. Eventually, however, their fraud is discovered and exposed - not by creationists, but by other scientists and the scientific community. So, there's that.So are you saying that just because they are scientist they are incapable of lying for the reasons of gaining fame and grants?
but you said that : An out of place fossil would be something like a rabbit in the precambrian - a fossil showing features that are shown evolving in later species.
so before i will give you such a case i want to be sure what do you mean by that. if i will show you an example of say 12354 instead of 12345 you will agree that evolution is false in this case or not?
Aman:>>No animal posts because they don't have the intelligence necessary to post. Amen?
Amen. Find us ANY animal (Humans are not animals) who posts or carries on a conversation online. You cannot since they are too dumb to post. Amen?
Angels.If you can show me a case of something that evolution says is impossible, then I will consider it.
If you can show me a case of something that evolution says is impossible, then I will consider it.
Angels.
Because evolution would say it's impossible? correct?There is no evidence that suggests angels exist.
What part of the word "CASE" did you?What part of the word "SHOW" did you miss?
Are they supposed to be?No. Because there is no evidence that angels are biological creatures.
I don't think so. Certainly that was not taught in my Sunday School, and that's why evolutionary biologists, whatever their religious beliefs about angels may be, have no scientific interest in them.Are they supposed to be?
And therefore are biologically impossible ... right?I don't think so. Certainly that was not taught in my Sunday School, and that's why evolutionary biologists, whatever their religious beliefs about angels may be, have no scientific interest in them.
I don't think they are biologically impossible, there is just no evidence, scientific or theological, that are are biological creatures.And therefore are biologically impossible ... right?
So if someone says, "Show me a case of something that evolution says is biologically impossible," I should make a case for angels ... correct?
Then show me on paper how angels are biological creatures.There is a difference between saying that angels are biologically impossible and saying that they are not known to be biological creatures.
What part of the word "CASE" did you?
Because evolution would say it's impossible? correct?
Are they supposed to be?
And therefore are biologically impossible ... right?
So if someone says, "Show me a case of something that evolution says is biologically impossible," I should make a case for angels ... correct?
That is the most ridiculous argument ever.
Animals can't use the internet, therefore God?
Are you serious? Do you expect me to take you seriously? If this is the best you've got, then it's not an argument, it's a joke.
If you can show me a case of something that evolution says is impossible, then I will consider it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?