I don't think it is I that has trouble reasoning!
I have stated many times that junk DNA does not sit with creationism and was one of the things you guys used to run into creationists. Now you have found junk DNA is not junk at all.
Vestigal organs do not align with creationism and once again this used to be run into creationists and still is. However scientists are also finding this assertion erraneous as they do have function. eg human apendix.
An ape like creature, eg the erraneous sketches of Neanderthal years ago, the bent over half ape half human, that can discuss afterlife would also suffice to disprove creation, but you cannot produce one of them as evidence either as they all mysteriously became extinct. How unfortunate!.
What you can present as evidence for evolution is a list of misrepresented kinds and species thrown into family ranks and non plausible scenarios, but no evidence that discredits creation.
.
I asked you for evidence that would not support creationism. Let's see what you came up with:
1. Vestigical organs. Well, there's strike one, because yes, the human appendix is vestigial. I can cut it out of you right now and it's absence would have no effect on you. But there are also plenty of others, such as eyes on blind cave fish, wings on flightless birds, dew claws, vestigical legs on pythons, whales' pelvis, etc. And no, having no function at all, is not required for "vestigial." What is required is loss of the function the organ performs in other species.
2. Junk DNA. This is not a technical term, nor have biologists ever claimed there was no purpose to any Junk DNA. That said, you could remove much of it with no effect. Much is just repeated sequences coding for nothing. In fact, some organisms don't have any Junk DNA at all, such as the puffer fish. Doesn't seem to hurt them not having any. So, that's strike two.
3. A Neanderthal discussing the afterlife. You already know they are extinct, so that is a stupid loaded example. I asked for potential tyoes of data we could find, not data we could not find. Nevertheless, since Neaderthals were just as intelligent as us (in fact their brain was slightly bigger), I would infer that they actually did discuss the afterlife while they were around. So, that's strike three.
I guess that means that creationism is falsified now. Thanks.