Why doesnt creationism need any data?

[British Bulldog]

You asked a question, and I answered it.

Are you here to learn, or are you here to vent & ridicule?

Your answer was ridiculous. Don't blame me if you haven't thought your beliefs through and find having the holes in your answer pointed out to you embarrassing. You'd be better off addressing the ridiculous position your answer puts you in rather than pouting about it.

 

[Greg1234]

The statement in itself makes sense.

"An un-testable thing created things."

It doesn't prove it's claims, though.

" A thing un-testable [by physical science] created things"

http://www.christianforums.com/t7578184-3/#post58047771

 

[Delphiki]

So you agree it's not science. Good.

 

[Non sequitur]

So you agree it's not science. Good.

Yay, for understanding what is not science!

 

[dad]

None has ever been presented to support it.

im curious why the believers dont need any.

They'd surely need some before investing in a get rich scheme.

Or if they are told their kid committed a crime.

Or that the roof needs replacing.

Why not for creationism?

Science wasn't there to gather or observe data. Other men were, and we have that data. Why is it you hide from data?

 

[Split Rock]

Science wasn't there to gather or observe data. Other men were, and we have that data. Why is it you hide from data?

Why is it that you produce no data with your split/merge dadology?

 

[AV1611VET]

Why is it that you produce no data with your split/merge dadology?

'Dadology'?

Are you demonstrating how Acts 11:26 worked?

There's nothing new under the sun, is there?

History truly repeats itself, doesn't it?

 

[Non sequitur]

'Dadology'?

Are you demonstrating how Acts 11:26 worked?

There's nothing new under the sun, is there?

History truly repeats itself, doesn't it?

It does, indeed...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_religion

 

[Split Rock]

'Dadology'?

Are you demonstrating how Acts 11:26 worked?

There's nothing new under the sun, is there?

History truly repeats itself, doesn't it?

"Dadology" refers to dad's made up, scientifically and theologically useless, self-gratifying "Split/Merge" model. You know... the one where before Peleg's "split" the physical and non-physical were mixed together which gives dad the excuse to claim that the physical laws were different before "the split." That way he can justify anything he makes up, 'cause light was different, water was different, dad's brain was different.. etc.

 

[Cabal]

'Dadology'?

Are you demonstrating how Acts 11:26 worked?

There's nothing new under the sun, is there?

History truly repeats itself, doesn't it?

Oh goodness, yes, you literalist guys are just so on the same level, aren't you?

At what point in dadology does Neptune become evil angel kryptonite, and at what point in embedded age creationism does God's floating timeship show up?

 

[Greg1234]

Yay, for understanding what is not science!

Science is only a branch of science. No, it's nt science, it's science. It also overlaps into science.

 

[Non sequitur]

Science is only a branch of science. No, it's nt science, it's science. It also overlaps into science.

Is God a branch of God?

 

[Nomarga]

Science is only a branch of science. No, it's nt science, it's science. It also overlaps into science.

What's your favorite planet? Mine's the sun. Always has been, 'cause it's like the king of planets.

 

[Greg1234]

What's your favorite planet? Mine's the sun. Always has been, 'cause it's like the king of planets.

Good for you.

 

[Phred]

What's your favorite planet? Mine's the sun. Always has been, 'cause it's like the king of planets.

His is the son. Yours is the sun. Hum...

 

[Delphiki]

What's your favorite planet? Mine's the sun. Always has been, 'cause it's like the king of planets.

Qo'noS... hands down.

 

[USincognito]

Science is only a branch of science. No, it's nt science, it's science. It also overlaps into science.

 

[Simply_Amazing]

Is God a branch of God?

According the the trinity, yes.

A = B A = C A = D However, B doesn't = C C doesn't = D and D doesn't = B

 

[AV1611VET]

According the the trinity, yes.

A = B A = C A = D However, B doesn't = C C doesn't = D and D doesn't = B

 

[British Bulldog]

Not even Christians pretend to understand that.