Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I see two kinds of sufferring...the kind that others can inflict upon us because of free will.....But some have to suffer much more. The luck of the draw, then?
What about babies and children? Do they suffer because of their choices? No, they suffer perhaps because of other people's choices. But not all suffering is from choices of anyone. Is cancer a choice? Are birth defects a choice?We suffer because of our choices and those of other people...I guess you can argue God did something bad by putting us here at all but he's not actually making anything bad happen. I don't understand why some people have a problem with this; I wouldn't want it another way.
Dr. Plantinga, in "God, Freedom, and Evil" adaquetly answered the so-called problem of evil using option one that you presented. To my knowledge, most philosophers of religion don't even forward the argument anymore except as an evidential defeater of God's goodness.Suffering is not well-justified in mainstream theology, because God is usually defined as both (1) foreknowing and (2) omnibenevolent.
The problem with these two assumptions is that if an infinitely good God has a choice of creating either (1) souls foreknown to sin/hell and (2) souls foreknown to choose only righteousness/heaven His mercy should limit Him to choice #2.
To say that choice 1 is okay is to call it commendable for God to create an infinite number of souls merely to watch them choose hell.
In fact, I am not even a good guy and I would definitely choose 2 every time if it were up to me.
Thus to explain suffering, we must either (A) find some ingenious way to reconcile God's infinite foreknowledge with His infinite benevolence (I don't know of anyone successful to date), or (B) we must redefine God such that there are limits to His benevolence or to His foreknowledge or to both, without impugning either His character or His leadership capacity.
I've accomplished option B in my own (free) Systematic Theology, although this is not the main focus of the book. You can send me a PM requesting the download link.
My own theological "discoveries" were actually a great relief to me, because I was finally able to conclude that suffering is justifiable and justified.