• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Why does god allow suffering?

Jun 19, 2010
17
0
✟22,627.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
A simple question, I'm sure many of you hear it all the time, but I've never gotten what I felt was an adequate answer from my family and local church folk. It's been one of the main issues that has stunted my faith for as long as i can remember.

Why (if he is omniscient/potent/benevolent) does God allow suffering?

I"m not familiar with scripture so please paraphrase it, if at all. Otherwise please, please keep it as simple and logical as possible.

Thank you very much in advance :)
 

drich0150

Regular Member
Mar 16, 2008
6,407
437
Florida
✟52,334.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Why (if he is omniscient/potent/benevolent) does God allow suffering?

"Suffering" is often deem as such by those who choose to view this life as the be all and end all to our existence. It is almost as If the thought was: If this is all we get then we should deserve to all be able to live as close to how heaven is described as we possibly can? other wise can it not be said that God is not loving nor kind as the bible describes Him.

What if we have been given this life in order to prepare ourselves for the next one? What if (for some) suffering was a necessary part of changing a set mind or a cold heart so that soul can live with God for an eternity in the next life?

Would you not trade 50 or 60 years of suffering for an eternity of bliss? How could God be referred to as: omniscient/potent/benevolent if He would not allow this brief suffering for an eternal life? What if He gave us all a heaven on earth existence for 60 or 70 years, but allowed to perish for an eternity when we did not see a need for change in our time in this life. We would literally have an eternity to ponder why a "omniscient/potent/benevolent" God would grant us such a brief taste of Heaven only to force us to an eternity in Hell.

Again, and before you make a fools argument by change my words around, I did say it is necessary for some people to suffer, not all. (I being one of the greatest.) Either way what we do indeed deem, suffering no matter how you look at it. It is only temporary. The suffering and worries of this life are only limited to this life. Whether you think suffering is warranted or not The suffering of this life will eventually come to an end. True suffering waits those who do not know Jesus in the next life. This suffering will be decided by the individual, and not by circumstance or God.

So while you still can enjoy this life you do have some preparations/decisions to make about true suffering, and your next life.
 
Upvote 0
Jun 19, 2010
17
0
✟22,627.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
That still doesn't really answer my question.

By putting suffering in quotation marks, are you implying it's relative? Or that its existence is benevolent??

Yes, if I knew a lifetime of earthly sacrifice and reverance would grant me eternal life, I would hop on that train in a second. Unfortunately I don't know, which is part of why I'm asking this question in the first place. Repetitive references to hell and eternal suffering are unnecessary, as is the presumption of an impending "fools argument". You may use felicific calculus all you want in regards to the pros and cons of sacrifice/heaven vs eternal damnation. I'm not particularly interested, thanks.

What if we have been given this life in order to prepare ourselves for the next one?
That would be awesome if someone could convince me of it.

What if suffering was a necessary...
Why? Why is suffering necessary at all for all God's omnipotence? Why was sin - which is inherently evil - created by an omnibenevolent being? Why does God tolerate Satan, an inherently destructive force?
I'm not unfamiliar with the Bible guys. I was raised in a Christian family, in a Christian society just like most of you This is the 3rd time I've reiteratted this question in varying degrees of elaboration, I thought it'd be easier than this.

Why is it necessary for there to be evil, sin, ect? How does that reconcile with omnibenevolence/ect?

Thanks drich :)
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

drich0150

Regular Member
Mar 16, 2008
6,407
437
Florida
✟52,334.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
That still doesn't really answer my question.

Then perhaps you should consider rephrasing your question.

Because The existence of "suffering" is only relative to the person making that particular judgment. One man "suffering" is another's way of life. Living in opulence 2000 years ago would be considered "suffering" by many living in today's standards.

By putting suffering in quotation marks, are you implying it's relative? Or that its existence is benevolent??

When I put "suffering" in quotes, my intention was to denote your specific version of suffering. So when I say "suffering" is relative. I'm saying the "suffering" you represented in your OP is relative.

Yes, if I knew a lifetime of earthly sacrifice and reverence would grant me eternal life, I would hop on that train in a second.

Perhaps according to some versions of christianity, but in reality a life of earthly sacrifice has nothing to do with eternal life.. Scripturally speaking.

Repetitive references to hell and eternal suffering are unnecessary, as is the presumption of an impending "fools argument".

The fool's argument was only mentioned once. The repetitive references were not meant to sell heaven or a certain life style, but to separate what you have deemed "suffering," and what scripture deems suffering. (As i remember you asked that we simplify scripture.) May i suggest that you take the time to look past some of the key words and religious phrases that you may be expecting to see, and read my posts at face value. Rather that religiously profiling what it is you expect me to say.

You may use felicific calculus all you want with the pros and cons of sacrifice/heaven vs eternal damnation. I'm not particularly interested, thanks.

If this is what you think I have present to you, then you are mistaken.

That would be awesome if someone could convince me of it.

God has offered to convince anyone, if you seek Him in the way He has shown us. Truthfully none one person has that ability.

Why? Why is suffering necessary at all for all God's omnipotence? Why was sin - which is inherently evil - created by an omnibenevolent being? Why does God tolerate Satan, an inherently destructive force?

To answer these questions first we must share some basic definitions.

Sin, is anything not in the expressed will of God.

Evil, is a malicious intent to commit sin.

Not all sin is evil, but all evil is sin.

Freewill, is the ability to choose something not in God's expressed will, in other words it is the ability to sin.

Why have we been given this gift?

So that we may have an ability to choose where we wish to spend eternity. In order for us to be able to choose we must have options. We do, in that we either choose God's expressed will, or we choose our own. But, with true choice comes consequence. It is the consequences of our choices that makes us ineligible to be with God, even if we do indeed choose Him. Because even if we do choose Him in the end. inevitably we will have chosen our will over His, many many times. This is true no matter who we think we are. So enter Jesus and His atoning sacrifice. It is through His blood that our choices have merit in the eyes of God.


Why? Why is suffering necessary at all for all God's omnipotence?
Because "suffering" is a consequence of Choice. If we stayed in God's expressed will there would be no suffering of any kind. (As it was with Adam and Eve before the Fall)

Why was sin -
So that we may have a legitimate option to God's expressed will.

which is inherently evil -
Sin is not inherently evil. Our intention in regards to sin is what makes sin evil.

created by an omnibenevolent being?
Again so we may have the ability to choose where we wish to spend eternity.

Why does God tolerate Satan, an inherently destructive force?
Satan is not the god of all evil. Also know God does not tolerate Satan, this is why He too will also be thrown into Hell, not as it's ruler but to be separated from God and his children for ever, just like everyone else who does not want to be with God.

Why is it necessary for there to be evil, sin, ect?

Evil and the suffering it causes, can be looked at as the "proof" of free will. If God were to take the ability for us to be evil away, then the question could be asked, Do we indeed have free will? If God is willing to intervene will our ability to be evil then why not sin? If He also prohibits our ability even from some sins, again doesn't that hinder the very essence of Free will?

Free will leads to Sin, Sin to Evil, Evil to "suffering."

How does that reconcile with omnibenevolence/ect?

Again, if God removes our ability to be evil, then are we really able to choose where we want to spend eternity? or are some of us just predestined to exist in Hell? If so what would be the point of this life? Why not just be created in Hell?

This all leads me back to a question I asked in my op, not as a way to convict you to convert your sinful ways, but as a measure to illustrate a point.

Wouldn't you rather spend 50 or 60 years in this life "suffering," and have an opportunity for a eternity in Heaven? or would you rather live a heavenly life style for 70 or 80 years and then spend the rest of eternity wondering why a Omni benevolent God send you to Hell after living such seemingly perfect life?

This makes me want to redirect your question back at you.
How could an omni benevolent God not allow suffering in this life when He (also being Omniscient) considers the eternity that lies beyond this 60 or 70 years?
 
Upvote 0

razeontherock

Well-Known Member
May 24, 2010
26,546
1,480
WI
✟35,597.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Ok, I have thought this one through thoroughly, and came upon my own answer long ago. It has held up to my scrutiny for over 25 years. This is NOT in the Bible, but I do believe it is spelled out 'between the lines,' so to speak.

God is. Everything that God is, is the very definition of what is good. No, that's not fair; God is simply big enough to do that. This is completely independent of what I consider to be good, or not good. [Some things God says are good are easy for me to agree with, and out of those things, some are even natural for me to do. There are things He says are sin I happen to enjoy, and out of those things some of them I find very enjoyable. This give cause for suffering, so it is relevant.]


=================================================================


What God is NOT is the definition of evil, and also exists. Since God is perfectly just, and He chose that His creation would be an expression of Himself, evil HAD to be part of it.

Lucifer was the "cherub that covers." He was also a light-bearing being. Again putting two and two together here, I think God expects us to infer that Lucifer was created to cover evil so it wouldn't be seen, nor be a temptation to anyone.

Lucifer got lured away by evil, fell, and became Satan. His new fallen nature somewhat resembles his original. So when he first shows up interacting with humans, he's "covering" evil with a lie, pretending it's good. Everybody buys into that, it's just a question of degrees. By this process Satan became ruler of this world.

Our lives are stuck between good and evil, and from God's perspective we are Kings, granted the power to rule over both kingdoms, and to decide which is in charge. He never equipped us with a transmission, so we need to learn to become pure; either good OR evil.

Evil is rampant in the world because as a species we haven't learned to be good.

Answer your question?
 
  • Like
Reactions: blessedmomof5
Upvote 0
Jun 19, 2010
17
0
✟22,627.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
this looks like a wall of text but it's just spaced out and quote-heavy, lol :D



Not quite, but that's much more to the point of what I was getting at. thank you very much sir, finally a forward response :clap:

God is. Everything that God is, is the very definition of what is good
Ok, omnibenevolence. Salient, yes.
But isn't everything that exists a part of God's omnibenevolent nature and manifestation? Conversely, anything that exists is a part of God (via his creation)? And yet there are things in the world that aren't good(sin). Here I don't understand whether, by said definition, evil is not a part of God (and so indepedent of an omnipotent being?), or rather that everything that is, including good and bad - both of which exist - are a part of him, disproving his magnanimity?

No, that's not fair; God is simply big enough to do that.
Omnipotence, got it.

this [what is God, and thus, is good] is completely independent of what I consider to be good, or not good. [Some things God says are good are easy for me to agree with, and out of those things, some are even natural for me to do. There are things He says are sin I happen to enjoy, and out of those things some of them I find very enjoyable.

Here I truly appreciate your candor but I am a little confused. Do you mean that God's morality is atleast somewhat incomprehesible to humans, so much so that some sinful things feel good? Conversely, why would only some of God's demands be 'natural'? Shouldn't they all? Or perhaps, again, evil is seperate from the all omnipotent God? Is suffering, sin and deliberate temptation a part of his nature or not?

This give cause for suffering, so it is relevant

...This goes back to my original question: Why is it relevant? Why is it necessary to suffer?
Everything that God is[exists], is the very definition of what is good.
Again, if God is entirely good, how could/why would he create evil? Because, I imagine if everything that exist is his creation, and (being a part of his benevolence), would thus be entirely good?

Since God is perfectly just, and He chose that His creation would be an expression of Himself, evil HAD to be part of it.
Okay, God is perfectly just/good. His creation is an expression of his omnibenevolent self. Okay, got it. Why does evil 'HAVE' to be a part of the self-expression of such an all-loving being? That seems pretty paradoxal, actually..

Lucifer was the "cherub that covers." He was also a light-bearing being. Again putting two and two together here, I think God expects us to infer that Lucifer was created to cover evil so it wouldn't be seen, nor be a temptation to anyone.
Wow, I was unaware of that. thank you for enlightening me :). But again, I still wonder what reason there is for evil to exist at all and why it would need to be covered

Lucifer got lured away by evil, fell, and became Satan. His new fallen nature somewhat resembles his original. So when he first shows up interacting with humans, he's "covering" evil with a lie, pretending it's good. Everybody buys into that, it's just a question of degrees. By this process Satan became ruler of this world.
Again... why? Lucifer was lured away by the evil God created, correct? How is it magnanimous to articulate the creation of evil in one way or another? God designed said nefarious deception of humanity by means of Satan in advance, knowing his predictably fallible human creations would fall for it over and over again, am I wrong?

Our lives are stuck between good and evil
...why?

and to decide which is in charge. He never equipped us with a transmission, so we need to learn to become pure; either good OR evil.
Evil is rampant in the world because as a species we haven't learned to be good.
Why is the option to suffer necessary? At all? How is it congruent with complete-benevolence?

Let's say I have a kid, and I have the knowledge and ability, and love them enough to make sure he/she could never be put, or put himself into a painful situation: why wouldn't I?

The gift of free will from a deity is noble, but it doesn't reconcile the existance of evil, which is in essence paradoxal to omnibenevolence.

These are the question I mull over almost every night. These are the questions I've asked family and friends and even their church's priest (I'm not very affiliated) but I've never gotten an answer that wasn't obscured with esoteric scriptures and fuzzy logic. Worse, I fear I've unintentionally shaken my mom and dad's faith with my inquiries, and even if I don't know, I don't want to inadvertantly rape my parents' belief system from them. So, I'm really open to a succinct, logical solution to this apparent contradiction.

And if I can only continue with one question, it would be my first: Why is evil necessary at all? How is that omnibenevolent?


Thank you Raze for a pointed and candid attempt to answer my question. Although I've not quite learned anything, you have given me a chance to refine and reaffirm my OP. thanks man :cool:

I guess if i could only continue will one question is would be the original: why is it necessary for evil to exist at all? how is that congruent with omnibenevolence?

It's pretty late so this might not be worrded too well, but i appreciate the help so far everyone
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

JasperJackson

Sinner and Saint
Dec 31, 2007
1,190
112
Adelaide
✟24,393.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Single
It comes down to a misunderstanding you have of God. You're using words like "omnibenevolent". You won't find that in the Bible. In fact, if you read through the Psalms you'll see that God actually hates people when they sin. You might not like that, but it's in the Bible so Christians believe it.

Are you familiar with the story of Job in the Bible? He was a wealthy man who lost everything: family and possessions. He complains to God, basically saying "why me?" But God's response is just (paraphrasing) "I'm God, you're not. I'll do what I want to". And maybe we find that hard to accept, but really, who are we to tell God what he should do and where he's gone "wrong"?
 
Upvote 0
Jun 19, 2010
17
0
✟22,627.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Semantics; as trite an argument as ever.

So, Christianity doesn't claim God is all-good/loving? I was unaware of that, I'll havta do some research.

In that case, I'm really not so willing to bow to a less than perfect diety. I kinda hope you're wrong :(

And yeah, the whole Job ordeal has always seemed quite immoral to me, personally. I am me to say what's wrong, and so are you. It's not hard.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

JasperJackson

Sinner and Saint
Dec 31, 2007
1,190
112
Adelaide
✟24,393.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Single
Semantics; as trite an argument as ever.
No, not semantics, but a correction. If you're trying to understand the God of the Bible you need to go back to the Bible and use the language it uses.

So, Christianity doesn't claim God is all-good/loving? I was unaware of that, I'll havta do some research.
I hope that research will include looking at the Bible.

And yeah, the whole Job ordeal has always seemed quite immoral to me, personally. I am me to say what's wrong, and so are you. It's not hard.
I'm not going to argue with you here. But I'll post part of God's response to Job that is better than any para-phrasing I can do:
38:1 Then the LORD answered Job out of the storm. He said:
2 "Who is this that darkens my counsel
with words without knowledge?

3 Brace yourself like a man;
I will question you,
and you shall answer me.

4 "Where were you when I laid the earth's foundation?
Tell me, if you understand.

5 Who marked off its dimensions? Surely you know!
Who stretched a measuring line across it?

6 On what were its footings set,
or who laid its cornerstone-

7 while the morning stars sang together
and all the angels [a] shouted for joy?

8 "Who shut up the sea behind doors
when it burst forth from the womb,

9 when I made the clouds its garment
and wrapped it in thick darkness,

10 when I fixed limits for it
and set its doors and bars in place,

11 when I said, 'This far you may come and no farther;
here is where your proud waves halt'?

12 "Have you ever given orders to the morning,
or shown the dawn its place,

13 that it might take the earth by the edges
and shake the wicked out of it?

14 The earth takes shape like clay under a seal;
its features stand out like those of a garment.

15 The wicked are denied their light,
and their upraised arm is broken.

16 "Have you journeyed to the springs of the sea
or walked in the recesses of the deep?

17 Have the gates of death been shown to you?
Have you seen the gates of the shadow of death ?

18 Have you comprehended the vast expanses of the earth?
Tell me, if you know all this.

19 "What is the way to the abode of light?
And where does darkness reside?

20 Can you take them to their places?
Do you know the paths to their dwellings?

21 Surely you know, for you were already born!
You have lived so many years!
 
Upvote 0
Jun 19, 2010
17
0
✟22,627.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
At drich:
can't bother reply to it all right now. missed you somehow sorry, but i'll try to cover my main points

I've rephrased my question over, and over. I assume you all are familiar with logic? I've been courteously simple enough, but I'll say it again: HOW DOES THE EXISTENCE OF EVIL NOT CONTRADICT GOD'S SUPPOSED OMNIBENEVOLENCE?

If suffering is relative then our pain means nothing/little to God? Okay... that's sounds more like a psychosocial argument of relative deprivation than it does one of absolute truth, but anyhow..

MY definition of suffering is the universal HUMAN defintion of suffering. Of "OW, that hurts. i'm starving. i'm dying. that's undersirable/malevolent".
I am using as basic philosophical language as I possibly can. Please don't ascribe it to my 'personal' misinterpretations. Strawman much? I couldn't be any more simple.

I said the subtextual threats of hell were repetitive, not the 'fool's argument' - that was merely presumed ("before you...") and thus kinda rude. sorry, i'm sensitive.

I'm not profiling you. From what I could glean you were saying that the human perception and experience of suffering doesn't matter, and I guess sin doesn't either? They're nearly equivocable right?

Your selling point of heaven versus eternal suffering seemed to suggest a sort of Pascal's wager, which is essentially felicific calculus motivated by mortality salience. I'm... mistaken?

God has had all of existence and creation to convince me of himself. And yet, the more I learn and the more I pose questions like these, the less plausible he seems. He's doing a good job of hiding himself from my fiercely inquisitive mind :p

Sin, is anything not in the expressed will of God.

Evil, is a malicious intent to commit sin.

Not all sin is evil, but all evil is sin.

Freewill, is the ability to choose something not in God's expressed will, in other words it is the ability to sin.
WHY IS IT EVEN AN OPTION? And how can/why would God create something that is not part of his expressed will?

I understand what you're saying but it all seems to skirt the original issue I've brought up again, and again: Why is evil necessary at all? Free will doesn't rectify this for me.


How's this: Why didn't God just create Heaven? Why is the test and temptation of human life necessary at all?
 
Upvote 0

razeontherock

Well-Known Member
May 24, 2010
26,546
1,480
WI
✟35,597.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
God is love, but He is also wrath, Judgment, and hatred. No sense mincing words about it.

I disagree w/ JJ, that God hates people today. I hold forth the Gospel to be that the Cross took away the enmity that exists in God's own mind between fallen mankind and Himself, whether any of us accepts that free gift or not.

But isn't everything that exists a part of God's omnibenevolent nature and manifestation? Anything that exists is a part of God (via his creation)?

Not the way I understand it. I cover that in my first post; please clarify if something's still not clear as I covered a lot of ground there.

And yet there are things in the world that aren't good(sin). Here I don't understand whether, by said definition, evil is not a part of God (and so indepedent of an omnipotent being?), or rather that everything that is, including good and bad - both of which exist - are a part of him

I hold the book of Job to be the oldest in the Bible. The first thing the book does is lays out that good and evil are NOT equal yet opposite elements of one whole. In other words, God purposefully smashes the concept of yin and yang, which was mankind's crowning understanding at that time. It is also worth noting this was hidden from Job.

This gets more complicated by the fact that evil can exist in the spiritual realm, without physical manifestation. As humans, this should be easy for all of us to understand. We can have horrible thoughts, but not act on them. If we have propensity to act on them but don't, God calls this "iniquity." It's not sin until we act on it, but God still knows our iniquities and Judges us for those too. :o :doh:

Fortunately, "God laid the iniquity of us all on [Jesus]" while He was on the Cross so that part's covered too.

Even more complicated is the fact that God says "woe to him who says God will not do evil, nor will He do good." Sorry to bring this up since it loses the clarity I tried to create so far, but do realize my first post conveyed my understanding, not contained in Scripture.

You're asking good questions, and they're tough ones. Part of your understanding needs to include that none of us see God perfectly, and whatever of Him we can perceive is such a TINY portion, that still completely overwhelms all our abilities!

Do you mean that God's morality is at least somewhat incomprehesible to humans,

I didn't say that but this shows we have communication. We can only comprehend God's Judgments by His written word, the Bible. Morality isn't a word He uses. Additionally, we each have a conscience and God deals with us in that realm, but it's not concrete like His written word. There is a reason the 10 commandments were written by the finger of God, in stone!

so much so that some sinful things feel good? Conversely, why would only some of God's demands be 'natural'? Shouldn't they all? Or perhaps, again, evil is seperate from the all omnipotent God? Is suffering, sin and deliberate temptation a part of his nature or not?

"God tempts no man, and cannot be tempted by evil." When I put something in quotes, normally it's Bible. I signify this as a way of saying it's not merely my own understanding or explanation, but God's authoritative answer on the subject.
The rest of your questions in the snip I quoted come down to our fallen nature. We do not exist as God initially created us. This holds true for the rest of this world as well; the point being that sin is far more awful than seems likely to us. That's really the root of ALL your questions here. The optimist in me says you're concerned with these things because God is beginning to show you the awfulness of your own sin, and this is the beginning of God showing Himself to YOU! I mean, why else would you care?

If you want to read about the vision God gave me showing me the awfulness of my own sin, it's in the sub-forum "dreams and visions" within "edification." I titled the thread "Bouncing like a yo-yo."

Why does evil 'HAVE' to be a part of the self-expression of such an all-loving being? That seems pretty paradoxal, actually..

But again, I still wonder what reason there is for evil to exist at all and why it would need to be covered

Again... why? Lucifer was lured away by the evil God created, correct?

Hopefully a careful reading of everything I've written answers these questions for you, or you at least see MY explanation for them, that God showed me, to let me share Peace with Him. Going further, I'll point out the difference between "created" and "made." As I understand it, "created" refers to it existing in God's mind, while "made" = physical creation. So I don't believe God had to create evil at all, and I don't think He did. This seems to be the point of the Garden of Eden, does it not? They knew good! That's all they knew. No evil.

The existence of evil that I referred to as being covered by Lucifer would be a non-created, non-physical spiritual phenomenon only. Lucifer was a Spiritual being, originally. He "left his first estate." Why he did this, why he was lured away, why he was tempted, we do not know. We know pride is central to it, and he tried to "be like God." I don't believe this involved trying to overthrow God at all. I believe God Himself is the One who started war, at that very moment. We are clearly stuck right in the middle of it! You find this to be true, hence your questions.

What we CAN know is how Lucifer's actions act as an example to us, what our differences are, and why that makes him so mad at US; but that goes beyond your questions ...

Peace to you, but not the artificial and cheap substitute for Peace that is merely sweeping it all under the rug. Kudos to you for being sensitive to your Parents needs! Might I suggest to you, that you share this subject with them only after you're finished wrestling with it? You have shown them that they've never really plumbed the depths of this subject, and that should serve to BUILD their Faith! Eventually. In the meantime, not smashing it to bits counts as "walking in Love." You're off to a good start :thumbsup:
 
Upvote 0
Jun 19, 2010
17
0
✟22,627.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
No, not semantics, but a correction. If you're trying to understand the God of the Bible you need to go back to the Bible and use the language it uses.
Why would I? My fallible human definitions seem just as, if not more, adequate as those in ancient Abrahamic texts. Why, we have 2000 more years of social evolution behind us, why waste it? :thumbsup:

I imagine it shouldn't be necessary to research whether God is all-good, seeing how as I have all you guys and even wikipedia says the claim that God is omnibenevolent is "an essential foundation of traditional christianity. Again, is God all-good, or not...? You're confusing me man :confused:

Yeah... i'm not so good with long metaphors. Seems like God is saying he knows more and is much greater than Job. Am I wrong? Seems redundant. How does that justify Job's unnecessary suffering for the sake of a frivolous bet with the devil? Is that not anything other than benevolent? What am I missing?

And I'm not trying to 'argue'. Just to get a straight answer out of someone. Like 99 percent of the nation is Christian and I have yet to...

edit: lol, the wash my mouth thing needs tweaking
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

razeontherock

Well-Known Member
May 24, 2010
26,546
1,480
WI
✟35,597.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
research whether God is all-good, seeing how as I have all you guys and even wikipedia says the claim that God is omnibenevolent is "an essential foundation of traditional christianity. Again, is God all-good, or not...?

Wiki's wrong. Please go back over my posts when you come back. I'll go edit wiki. :doh:

Seems like God is saying he knows more and is much greater than Job. Am I wrong? Seems redundant. How does that justify Job's unnecessary suffering for the sake of a frivolous bet with the devil? Is that not anything other than benevolent?

Yes it is something other than benevolent, but it is NOT a frivolous bet with the devil! There is much more going on here ...

And besides, Job comes out WAY better off than before his trials. Hhhmmm,
who else do we know that endured suffering in obedience to God,and was later rewarded for it?
 
Upvote 0

ebia

Senior Contributor
Jul 6, 2004
41,711
2,142
A very long way away. Sometimes even further.
✟54,775.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
AU-Greens
A simple question, I'm sure many of you hear it all the time, but I've never gotten what I felt was an adequate answer from my family and local church folk. It's been one of the main issues that has stunted my faith for as long as i can remember.

Why (if he is omniscient/potent/benevolent) does God allow suffering?

I"m not familiar with scripture so please paraphrase it, if at all. Otherwise please, please keep it as simple and logical as possible.

Thank you very much in advance :)
In my opinion the story of Noah is written to be the bible's answer to that question:

Humanity's behaviour has gone so badly wrong that suffering is endemic. God regrets ever creating people. He chooses Noah as the "only righteous one" and his family to build a boat to save a representative group while the rest - all that has gone wrong - is wiped out by the waters. The floods come and wipe it all out and paradise is restored. Noah get's drunk and it all goes horribly wrong all over again.
 
Upvote 0