Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I'm saying nothing of the kind. Just pointing out that the definition of martyr includes people whose tactics and principles both you and I despise.Are you saying that there is no difference between a suicide bomber and the Coptic Christians who were beheaded for not denouncing their faith in Christ?
Are you saying that a person who has a gun, put to their head, and then asked to denounce their faith or die, doesn't denounce their faith and is shot to death, is no different than a person who straps a bomb to their body and explodes it in a crowd of innocent people???????
If you are correct, a suicide bomber could go into a classroom of kindergarten kids of a different faith or belief and blow their self and everyone else up and they would ALL be martyrs.
That is one twisted view of martyrdom....
there are a number of reasons.
third is the charade and nonsense associated with this topic.
piltdownman is a classic example of this.
it took the scientific community 40 years to expose this hoax.
You may not have noticed, but those 40 years included 1914-18 and 1939-45, when European scientists had more immediate worries than investigating the credentials of 'Piltdown Man'. Also, several of Charles Dawson's other hoaxes, such as the Beauport statuette, the Pevensey brick and the Maresfield map, were not exposed until more than 60 years after they were 'discovered'. Isn't it curious that we don't hear much about the folly and credulity of the archaeologists and cartographers who accepted these examples of ''charade and nonsense', and that we don't hear people saying that the fact that these fakes were accepted for so long proves that the whole of archaeology and cartography are lies?
Posted 10/6/99. A University of Toronto professor believes that one of the most sacrosanct rules of 20th-century science -- that the speed of light has always been the same - is wrong. Ever since Einstein proposed his special theory of relativity in 1905, physicists have accepted as fundamental principle that the speed of light -- 300 million meters per second -- is a constant and that nothing has, or can, travel faster. John Moffat of the physics department disagrees - light once traveled much faster than it does today, he believes. Recent theory and observations about the origins of the universe would appear to back up his belief. For instance, theories of the origin of the universe -- the "Big Bang"- suggest that very early in the universe's development, its edges were farther apart than light, moving at a constant speed, could possibly have traveled in that time. To explain this, scientists have focused on strange, unknown and as-yet-undiscovered forms of matter that produce gravity that repulses objects.
Moffat's theory - that the speed of light at the beginning of time was much faster than it is now - provides an answer to some of these cosmology problems. "It is easier for me to question Einstein's theory than it is to assume there is some kind of strange, exotic matter around me in my kitchen." His theory could also help explain astronomers' discovery last year that the universe's expansion is accelerating. Moffat's paper, co-authored with former U of T researcher Michael Clayton, appeared in a recent edition of the journal Physics Letters.
A University of Toronto Release. CONTACT: Bruce Rolston, U of T Public Affairs, (416) 978-6974
Don't forget to add that in a very real sense, that outside of Christ we are pretty much invisible to God.
(bolding mine)...
suggest that very early in the universe's development, its edges were farther apart than light, moving at a constant speed, could possibly have traveled in that time. To explain this, scientists have focused on strange, unknown and as-yet-undiscovered forms of matter that produce gravity that repulses objects.
Moffat's theory - that the speed of light at the beginning of time was much faster than it is now - provides an answer to some of these cosmology problems. ...
there are a number of reasons.
first is HOX genes.
any mutation of these genes quickly lead to a non viable organism.
this implies each organism has a unique origin, it didn't mutate from something else.
second is, there is no evidence that inanimate matter becomes alive.
third is the charade and nonsense associated with this topic.
piltdownman is a classic example of this.
it took the scientific community 40 years to expose this hoax.
As a Christian: What's the problem with this theory anyway?
I always find it amusing when humans pretend to speak for a deity.
It's got nothing to do with pretending to speak for a deity, it's more along the lines of offering a gentle warning to someone who seems quite incapable of telling the difference between said deity and comic strip heroes/supernatural entities.
That being said, do you know the difference between the God of the Bible and said comic strip heroes/supernatural entities? Care to enlighten our readers.
One book has more pictures?
Snoopy rules!Loudmouth!
So you can't tell us what the difference is between comic book superheroes and God?
Sure, I can tell the difference between comic strip heroes/supernatural entities and the God of the Bible. Can you? ( my initial question to you )
Sure, I can tell the difference between comic strip heroes/supernatural entities and the God of the Bible. Can you? ( my initial question to you )
Apparently not. Can you?
I can: the Bible was written before the comics.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?