Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I asked..."Is the image an example of the first skull transitioning into the last skull?"
You answered...no, they're all considered transitional fossils.
If they're not an example of the first skull transitioning into the last skull, then they're not an example of transitional fossils.
You need to reread what I said. I have said I don't know.
Whether they are in the right order or not does not change if they are "transitional".
As you can see here: Human Evolution, they are transitional fossils. Any other questions?
I don't believe in evolution for the same reason I don't believe in gravity, it's science. Science is not a belief system, it's how the world works.
LOL@"peer-reviewed". "Peer-reviewed apparently does little to prevent many of the errors of 'science'.
Science has given us cars, airplanes, satellites, put a vehicle on mars, put man on the moon, produced vaccines, medicine, and many other things that enhance our life. It is demonstrably not seriously flawed, and peer review is part of that process.
If you say science doesn't know anything, then be ethical and quit using products developed by science.
One is based on the scientific method, the other is based on guesses and suppositions.
If you don't know they're in the right order, how can you know they're transitional? Transitional from what to what?
I'm not suggesting that science doesn't know anything, I'm saying that science doesn't know everything and that science is littered with error from the past. The truth of science today may be the lie of science tomorrow.
Simply be aware that science isn't always telling you the truth.
wait.. . . , you would understand allopatric speciation, . . .
please sir, do not ever speak to me again.Thus, Balaam's Ass makes more sense than you to a biologist, and the talking serpent of Eden spoke more truth.
if anyone doubts that, look into how they found the missing solar neutrinos.The truth of science today may be the lie of science tomorrow.
this where evolution is giving science a bad name.Simply be aware that science isn't always telling you the truth.
one more thing, a survey of 1000 biology teachers show the majority reluctant to teach evolution.
it was suggested the teachers take an "evolution" class.
sure:Without the following information, your points are meaningless. Could you please answer:
1. Could you please link to the survey.
why would they become biology teachers?If they didn't want to teach evolution because they didn't understand it, don't you think this is an excellent suggestion?
[/quote]Originally Posted by ThinkForYourself
2. Who published the graph?the british journal "nature"
3. Is this information from a peer-reviewed paper? If so, could I please have the title of the paper and the journal or ? it was published in.sure.
Martin, Robert D., Primate origins: plugging the gaps, Nature, Vol. 363, 20 May 1993 , p 223
4. How does the graph show we could have evolved from alligators just as easily as from apes.it means you can't draw ANY conclusions from it.
Thanks.
I'm not suggesting that science doesn't know anything, I'm saying that science doesn't know everything and that science is littered with error from the past. The truth of science today may be the lie of science tomorrow. Simply be aware that science isn't always telling you the truth.
wait.
a what?
so now we have this "invader" taking over a population, spreading like wildfire.
no, i haven't heard of it and it sounds ridiculous.
do you have anything of substance in support of this concept?
surely you don't expect me to take you at your word, especially after you last sentence.
another thing, if evolutionists were really on the up and up, why do they cloud the issue with words the common man does not know?
one more thing, a survey of 1000 biology teachers show the majority reluctant to teach evolution.
it was suggested the teachers take an "evolution" class.
please sir, do not ever speak to me again.
strawman.Did you ever find those laws you claim existed, to force the teaching evolution? Or were you wrong about that claim.
These legal rulings and legislative victories are clearly necessary for evolution to maintain its proper place in the biology curriculum, but they are not sufficient. Implementation of state standards, adherence to court decisions, and the full integration of textbook material rests in the hands of the thousands of classroom teachers throughout the country. And about this, we are less sanguine. Notwithstanding the professionalism and bravery of the teachers in Dover, the status of evolution in the biology and life sciences curriculum remains highly problematic and threatened.
we will FORCE evolution upon you by law.
You are correct.
It is possible that Santa Claus' elves made all life on earth at the same time. Or Zeus. Or Mithra. Or an invisible purple unicorn that lives in your toilet bowl. It is all possible.
But supernatural beings creating life doesn't really sound too plausible, does it?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?