First, here's the problem - this is not really a debate forum, nor an apologetics forum. It's a forum to ask a question and get answers. You asked a question, and I gave an answer. Then you refuted my answer as if you were refuting an argument, but I didn't offer it as argument. My answer was "I see that Christ is God", and you really can't argue such a statement.
That's just silly to call that "error". If I say a certain beer is the best, it means it's the best beer I know of, it doesn't mean I've "studied" every beer produced everywhere on earth throughout history.
Not a primary concern of mine.
I wouldn't say something like that because I don't agree with it.
My point was, you claimed that in ANY other gods there's 'nothing to look at, just ideas to think about'. My point was, you have not studied every god, and you cannot possibly know that there's 'nothing to look at'. Furthermore, you say that Christ is the 'best' idea out of all the other gods, but again, you have not studied even 1/100th of all the religions in the world. If you still don't understand your error, I'm expressing myself poorly, you do not understand logic, or both.
That's just silly to call that "error". If I say a certain beer is the best, it means it's the best beer I know of, it doesn't mean I've "studied" every beer produced everywhere on earth throughout history.
Now if you wanted to make logical sense,
Not a primary concern of mine.
you could say something like this:
"Christ makes more sense to be than any other gods that I've studied because of X, Y, and Z." (where X, Y, and Z logically support your statement)
I wouldn't say something like that because I don't agree with it.
Upvote
0