Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I guess two important questions to ask would be "what is grace?" and "what is salvation?" and a third to ask would probably be "do I have freedom and what am I?"
Why can no one tell us the actual mechanics of losing salvation ?Why do some denominations, such as the Church of God, not believe in Once Saved Always Saved, even though the Bible clearly outlines that salvation is eternal? That is, salvation is by grace through faith and it is something that cannot be taken from you.
While I believe that grace covers such Christians and that they are genuinely saved for putting their faith in the Lord, Jesus Christ, it must be somewhat troublesome to think that backsliding will result in you becoming detached from the Lord. It seems like it would hinder someone's growth in the Lord rather than promote obedience.
The thing is that God chooses us and we respond. He doesn't let go of us once we're a Child of God.
Sometimes it seems like such denominations haven't viewed the Bible in its entire scope, interpreting. What is your take on this subject?
Salvation is also of the Son of YAHWEH, Jesus the Christ, just as Moses gave the Hebrews salvation from the Egyptians in the OT.....with heaps of help from YAHWEH of course.salvation is of God and so when we are not of God we are not saved. everything outside the new Jerusalem is gnashing of teeth and weeping. salvation is not a thing,
God is salvation. salvation is not a belief system, it is a spiritual reality that we experience when we love God. salvation is a spiritual understanding that God loves us and seeks us to be well and goes through great lengths to show us that who he is is what image we ought to be conformed to. the Holy Spirit is all good virtues and he wishes to grow inside of us for all eternity because it is good that we be together rather than cut off from him and suffering in sin.
Why can no one tell us the actual mechanics of losing salvation ?
According to some Wesleyan perspectives, many Xians have repeatedly lost and regained their saved status by sinning and repenting.Have any of you "lost" your salvation and for what reason ?
Why empirical? Why is Scriptural evidence insufficient?If one opposes OSAS, then there should be empirical evidence.
Ridiculous. There is nothing "logical" about that statement at all, except for people who base theology on experience much more than on Scripture.It is logical that those who say salvation can be lost, have lost salvation.
How does one know with certainty that salvation has really been lost ?
For those of certain Wesleyan views, it is regained by repentance.And most importantly how is salvation re-captured and re-activated ?
The alternative to OSAS is [whatever given] list of personal performance for retention criteria.
At that point faith has fallen into being law with penalty. Could have just as well stuck to the law. At least it's a visible measure on the outside of the cup. No need to even add faith to the mix. Can't measure it anyway.
How often have you lost your salvation ?
I am not saying you are unsaved or questioning your salvation.
I am not questioning your salvation, you are secure in Christ.
You are against OSAS, therefore when are you not saved ?
This is a legitimate questioned based upon your pov.
Who better to ask about losing salvation than one who believes it ?
Why can no one tell us the actual mechanics of losing salvation ?
I guess two important questions to ask would be "what is grace?" and "what is salvation?" and a third to ask would probably be "do I have freedom and what am I?"
So then you propose a rejection of the Bible teaching on falling from Grace because to accept the clear teaching of the Bible in that regard would mean we would have no way to reject Romans 2:13-16 ?
Tried to be simple with you on matters of law so we could maybe find common ground. YES, I believe every jot and tittle of the LAW stands firm, secure and active to this day.Or are you saying that the kind of Gospel where Matt 18 and Romans 2 are true - is not at all compatible with grace?
There is no empirical tangible proof of having, losing or not losing salvation. The positions are held by an intangible called faith.It would not be logical to claim that to accept the Bible texts listed above over the man-made tradition of OSAS -- one must first lose their salvation.
I think we all see that point clearly.
indeed.
"God so loved the WORLD that He gave His only begotten Son that whosoever believes on him might not perish -- but have everlasting life".
Romans 10 describes the process of salvation.
John 1:11 describes the free will nature of salvation.
Matt 18, Romans 11, Gal 5:4 the fact that one can lose their salvation.
Isn't it nice how we can disagree so much on one subject then basically agree on another.With the exception of taking that free will too far I come to the same conclusion. Your Matt. 18 Parable was spot on. It teaches the truth. While I don't think it was that man's will to lose his salvation, he definitely lost it by forgetting how we treat others is how we treat Christ. .
No one here rejects scripture, so let's get that old hack off the table.
You are presenting an idea that is not defined i.e. Bible teaching on falling from Grace and another idea that there is a need to reject Romans 2:13-16. Feel free to stretch those out to something tangible to discuss.
Both Romans 3 and Galatians 3 make that case about the lost. The Law even after the cross condemns the lost as sinners and doomed to the second death.Your entire system revolves (in my eyes) around a logical fallacy, i.e. if you break the law, you sin, are condemned and stand in the condemnation of potential eternal death.
Indeed -- if there were no bible texts talking about the subject (or if all of them could be avoided when they do speak to the subject) then simply coming up with that sort of "faith that one might lose salvation" would indeed be an odd choice.Having faith that you might not be saved seems a bit odd use of faith wouldn't you say?
If those texts at this linkAnd why is it you feel the need to threaten yourself into performing to obtain salvation anyway?
Your argument is "with the text" you are arguing as to why they should not exist.What is faith by threat but the reactions of fear for your eternal hide. That's not faithful performance, it's solely fear based performance, and not a good one at that.
How does one "know with certainty" that one is saved?
For those of certain Wesleyan views, it is regained by repentance.
For those of Classical/Reformation Arminian perspectives, once abandoned salvation can never be regained, because the person who abandoned it will never again repent.
I provide a list of texts - and quote them showing that OSAS does not survive the text.
The response was made that we would all need to be legalists if we reject OSAS - in favor of the texts listed in that post.
Romans 2:13-16 is clear about the need to not simply be a "hearer of the law" - but a doer.
Both Romans 3 and Galatians 3 make that case about the lost. The Law even after the cross condemns the lost as sinners and doomed to the second death.
You may be objecting to the idea that the saved saints can fall from grace by sinning
(not with each sin - but following a path of sin as Paul points out in 1Cor 6) -- and that is where the warning in Matt 18, and Romans 11, and Gal 5:4 (and 1Cor 6 and ...) comes in.
Did not exist then I certainly would not want to "threaten myself" with non-existent texts.
But if the requirement from OSAS POV is to avoid the texts or call others evil who notice them etc - then I draw the line.
If the sinless perfection crowd is stuck with an on again off again salvation due to committing a sin, that is one definition I suppose.
Uh huh. STILL being sinners I might add. No one 'repents' themselves into being sinless either.But, as saints, they are restored quickly to salvation.
It's a failure of honesty. That is one matter. People like to view themselves only in a good light, never in an honest light.Those who cannot repent have lost nothing. Their heart is stone, and never was changed.
salvation is of God and so when we are not of God we are not saved.
Why empirical? Why is Scriptural evidence insufficient?
Ridiculous. There is nothing "logical" about that statement at all, except for people who base theology on experience much more than on Scripture.
There is a false notion that when people are not committing the action of sin, then they are neither sinners nor sinning.
That is where part of the lie resides.
We remain sinners from the day we are born til the day we die. Not one of us is ever 'sinless' the entire time, not even for a second.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?