- Nov 21, 2008
- 53,346
- 11,902
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- SDA
- Marital Status
- Married
It reminds me of Muslims appealing to Bible scholar turned atheist Bart Ehrman. Since they claim the New Testament was corrupted, they use things said by Ehrman against the NT to back up that claim. Even though there's no way that Ehrman would lend any scholarly support the Koran and Islam.
Ehrman is in interesting case - surprised you brought him up. But I can see why Muslims would want to get an atheist like Ehrman to discredit the Bible since they commonly claim that the Bible is a corrupted text and the Koran the only trustworthy one. But your argument that atheists like Ehrman don't want to help Muslims attack the Bible is like the dog saying to the crow "when I steal this food off the Kitchen table and eat some of it outside - I hope you don't think I am helping you". Muslims and Atheists often share the same goal when it comes to the Bible.
Though David Wood points out that the Muslims have a lot of problems making that argument.
So this is all the more reason for me to stick with D.L. Moody and the "Baptist Confession of Faith Sectn 19" rather than make my case based on Ehrman and Muslims.
Last edited:
Upvote
0