It's like saying "gravitationism" involves giant magnets making apples fall on people's heads.
-CryptoLutheran
Just not in "real life".
I real life this is what the high-priests of evolutionism say about their own religion in the past 150 years. (Statements you never find about physics in the last 150 years)
===============================================
As we saw that again in the case of the fraudulent horse series
"I admit that
an awful lot of that [imaginary stories] has gotten
into the textbooks as though it were true. For instance,
the most famous example still on exhibit downstairs [in the American Museum of Natural History] is the exhibit on
horse evolution prepared perhaps 50 years ago. That has been
presented as literal truth in textbook after textbook. Now I think that
that is lamentable ..."
Niles Eldredge, as quoted in Luther D Sunderland, Darwin's Enigma: Fossils and Other Problems, 4th ed. 1988, pg 78.
"The
uniform continuous transformation of Hyracotherium into Equus, so dear to the hearts of generations of textbook writers,
never happened in nature."—G.G. Simpson, Life of the Past (1953), p. 119.
============================
The so
rts of things world class scientists were not saying about gravity and thermodynamics in the 1980's and 1950's
Here is a fact already in evidence.
After the bold
equivocation between junk-science evolutionism and actual science like the law of Gravity and the laws of thermodynamics - I pointed out the blunder - showing that in real life you don't see world class scientists saying the sorts of thing about gravity as evolutionism's own atheist scientists say about evolutionism.
============
Collin Patterson (atheist and diehard evolutionist to the day he died in 1998) - Paleontologist British Museum of Natural history speaking at the
American Museum of Natural History in 1981 - said:
Patterson - quotes Gillespie's arguing that Christians
"'...holding creationist ideas could plead ignorance of the means and affirm only the fact,'"
Patterson countered, "That seems to summarize the feeling I get in talking to evolutionists today. They plead ignorance of the means of transformation, but affirm only the fact (saying):'Yes it has...we know it has taken place.'"
"...Now I think that
many people in this room would acknowledge that during the last few years, if you had thought about it at all,
you've experienced a shift from evolution as knowledge to evolution as faith. I know that's true of me, and I think it's true of a good many of you in here...
"...,
Evolution not only conveys no knowledge, but seems somehow
to convey anti-knowledge , apparent knowledge which is actually harmful to systematics..."
========================
A great example of what scientists do NOT say about the
study of Gravity.
And yet... at no loss for large levels of glossing over details and equivocation - we could just "repeat" the suggestion for "gravitationism" as do some.
It's like saying "gravitationism" involves giant magnets making apples fall on people's heads.
-CryptoLutheran
There you go again, trying to insult science by calling it a religion.
Just no "in real life".
In real life I call the junk-science religion of evolutionism - a religion but not chemistry, observable biology, physics etc
Not saying you cannot continue to 'believe" that Genesis 1 says that God came here to create amoeba's - wait 3.5 billion years then finally -- at last - get a horse on planet earth. If that's your religious conviction - have at it.
Now as for that horse...
===============================================
As we saw that again in the case of the fraudulent horse series
"I admit that
an awful lot of that [imaginary stories] has gotten
into the textbooks as though it were true. For instance,
the most famous example still on exhibit downstairs [in the American Museum of Natural History] is the exhibit on
horse evolution prepared perhaps 50 years ago. That has been
presented as literal truth in textbook after textbook. Now I think that
that is lamentable ..."
Niles Eldredge, as quoted in Luther D Sunderland, Darwin's Enigma: Fossils and Other Problems, 4th ed. 1988, pg 78.
"The
uniform continuous transformation of Hyracotherium into Equus, so dear to the hearts of generations of textbook writers,
never happened in nature."—G.G. Simpson, Life of the Past (1953), p. 119.
============================
So then "ignoring every detail in that post" we have ....
The horse series is not fraudulent. Horses did evolve.
Othaniel Marsh lied - his fraudulent horse "sequence" is STILL on display in the Smithsonian.
He simply "arranged" the examples in an order that his "imagination" told him to do - NOT according to how they are " found in the dirt" -- he made up the sequence AS IF that is how they appear -- it is not. But that was not "known" until about 50 years after the fraud was well accepted as the "BEST example" of blind faith evolutionism found in nature.
The only problem with the evolution series presented in the past was it was too simple.
NOW THAT spin-doctoring is truly "lamentable".
Alternate reality? OR is that what you think this "lament" by Niles Eldredge means??
"I admit that
an awful lot of that [imaginary stories] has gotten
into the textbooks as though it were true. For instance,
the most famous example still on exhibit downstairs [in the American Museum of Natural History] is the exhibit on
horse evolution prepared perhaps 50 years ago. That has been
presented as literal truth in textbook after textbook. Now I think that
that is lamentable ..."
Niles Eldredge, as quoted in Luther D Sunderland, Darwin's Enigma: Fossils and Other Problems, 4th ed. 1988, pg 78.
"The
uniform continuous transformation of Hyracotherium into Equus, so dear to the hearts of generations of textbook writers,
never happened in nature."—G.G. Simpson, Life of the Past (1953), p. 119.
============================
