• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Why do Christians hate Wicca(Witchcraft)?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Havoc

Celtic Witch
Jul 26, 2002
4,652
91
63
Realityville
Visit site
✟29,135.00
Faith
Pagan
Lizquests said:
For a biblical definition of witchcraft: Witchcraft is paralleled to rebellion/disobedience against God.
A Biblical Definition of Witchcraft is an oxymoron, since the Bible, in it's original languages does not mention Witchcraft, or any word than can reasonably be translated as Witchcraft.

The words Witch and Witchcraft were a mistranslation, probably an intentional one, that King James insisted be included in the version bearing his name.
 
Upvote 0

PistGurl

aahhh.....I love her>
Dec 30, 2003
340
3
38
Sheffield
✟519.00
Faith
Pagan
Tracie said:
PistGurl - When did Jesus say Christians are to accept other religions?
Also, I do believe Budhists and other people who practice Eastern religions, along with every other person on Earth, is a sinner. Just to clarify - everyone is a sinner.

Tracie

I could give you a few examples, but I will do so at a later date!

One though, that is quite clear, is the parable of the good samaritan, did Jesus not say love your neighbour, through whatever differences you may have, for to love that neighbour is to love me.?

If not, tell me, cos I'll apologise, and accept I was wrong, but first, read the bible again, and see how many times it is written to accept everone...accept meaning to love them for who they are and what they do.
 
Upvote 0

Smilin

Spirit of the Wolf
Jun 18, 2002
5,650
244
59
Appalachia, The Trail of Tears
Visit site
✟30,906.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Lizquests said:
I wanted to share w/ all of you something that I found written by Diane S. Dew:


I. All forms of the occult - divination, necromancy, astrology, hypnotism, fortune-telling, magic, etc. - are forbidden by God.
Tea Leaf reading is considered a parlor trick by many, including tarot cards
and ouijah boards.

Consulting or contacting the dead. What does God say about them
contacting us?

Astrology..forbidden by God? pfffttt....it was a sign in the stars
that led the wise men to the birthplace of Jesus. Seems that God
wouldn't use something he forbid.

Fortune telling...again a parlor trick by most

Magic? Tell David Copperfield God doesn't approve.

II. Interest in the occult is not a recent development.
A. Witchcraft was openly and widely practiced in Old Testament times.

Isaiah 8:19; 19:3; 29:4
Ezekiel 21:21
Hosea 4:12
Micah 3:6-7; 5:12

B. It was still rampant in the early church.

1. Simon the magician Acts 8:9, 11
2. Elymas the sorcerer. Acts 13:8
3. The girl at Philippi. Acts 16:16
4. The city of Ephesus. Acts 19:19
And what constituted witchcraft during that time period? That is KEY
in debating this issue. Yet noone can give a proper definition AND stick
with it for this discussion. You'd also like to consider that over 100,000
humans were executed by the charge of witchcraft during the early
years of the Church by the Roman empire. Political agendas were
the driving factors. Want more details?

C. The Word of God testifies that there will be an increased curiosity in the occult in the latter days.
Your book sais many things. That believer will take up serpents and drink
poison. That those who abandon their families for Christ will be blessed.
That those who give up their lives for the scriptures will be blessed.

Forgive me if I care too much for my family to drink poison, abandon them,
or blow myself up for Jesus. I'm sure a loving Father would understand.

III. What force or power is at work in the supernatural manifestations of the occult?

A. The teachings of spiritism are doctrines of demons!
BULLDOOKY! My ancestors taught all of the Creation is spiritual.
Demons...pffffttt.... Have you ever met a demon? I've only
experienced spiritual enlightenment from the Creation...nothing demonic.

B. Not all miracles are of God. Satan can also perform lying signs and wonders.
Hmmm...lots of televangelists fall into this category.
C. Occult involvement may lead to demon possession.
And alliance with Santa Clause can lead to transformation into an elf.
Demonic possession is a superstion from the dark ages. We've
explained through psychology mental/personality disorders which
once were classified 'demonic'. The only demons are the ones
we create.

A. Under the Law (Old Testament), the punishment was death by stoning.
Are you Jewish or Christian. Christians aren't bound by the old covenant
are they? The majority of your scriptural quotes are from the OT,
and would only apply to those of the Jewish faith.

I pray that anyone involved in this will SERIOUSLY think about this and not guff it off right away. Try to have an open mind and investigate some of this that I have provided.

God Bless you!:prayer:
Thank you for your concern, yet I am at peace with my own spirituality
and the Divine Creator.
 
Upvote 0

Smilin

Spirit of the Wolf
Jun 18, 2002
5,650
244
59
Appalachia, The Trail of Tears
Visit site
✟30,906.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Havoc said:
A Biblical Definition of Witchcraft is an oxymoron, since the Bible, in it's original languages does not mention Witchcraft, or any word than can reasonably be translated as Witchcraft.

The words Witch and Witchcraft were a mistranslation, probably an intentional one, that King James insisted be included in the version bearing his name.
And what was King James motives for this deception? We both know.

However the origianal languages, depending on the passage,
weren't consistent to what they were referring to. I've dug up 18 different meanings of 'witch' in English:

Witch:a follower of Witchcraft. It has so many conflicting meanings that it should be used with great care (or preferably never at all) in order to avoid confusion. 18 common meanings are:
  1. A Gothic Satanist; a worshiper of Satan who, during the late Middle Ages and Renaissance, was believed to use black magic to harm others, by involving the aid of Satan and his demons. They didn't exist
  2. A Wiccan; a follower of Wicca, a recently created, benign, Neopagan religion which is largely based on the some of the symbols, deities, seasonal days of celebration of an ancient European Celtic religion. Wiccans are prohibited from using magic to harm others; they do not believe in the existence of Satan or demons.
  3. A woman of such incredible beauty that she bewitches others.
  4. A woman of incredible ugliness; a hag.
  5. A person who practices benign Magick to influence the world through rituals.
  6. A magician with unusual knowledge who can apparently perform miracles during ceremonial magic rituals.
  7. In ancient Native American usage and the Hebrew Scriptures (Old Testament): an evil person who secretly uses evil sorcery (black magic) to intentionally harm others.
  8. In the Christian Scriptures (New Testament): a criminal who murders people by administering poisons.
  9. A follower of modern-day Religious Satanism, recognizing Satan as a virile pre-Christian, pagan entity.
  10. A wizard who inhabits an alternate world of fantasy and magic, filled with good and evil people with magical powers, flying broomsticks, invisibility cloaks, dragons, talking animals, magical quills, etc. e.g. Harry Potter™ books.
  11. A person, usually a woman, who was born with supernatural abilities and is capable of performing miracles by waving a wand, wiggling their nose, etc. This is often seen in TV programs, like Bewitched or Charmed. They don't exist either.
  12. Followers of a group of Caribbean religions which combine elements of tribal African religions with Christianity; e.g. Santeria and Vodun.
  13. In some African Aboriginal religions, a person who unknowingly has supernatural powers capable of hurting others. Witch doctors attempt to counteract these evil energies.
  14. An expert, as in: "She is a witch of a writer."
  15. A person who uses a forked stick or other instrument to locate sources of underground material -- typically water.
  16. A woman who is not submissive to her husband.
  17. A general "snarl" word for a nasty, vicious person, typically female.
  18. A follower of any religion other than Christianity (e.g. of Buddhism, Islam, Hinduism, Native American Spirituality, etc.).
 
Upvote 0

Lizquests

Active Member
Nov 21, 2003
217
30
51
Wisconsin
✟536.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Havoc said:
A Biblical Definition of Witchcraft is an oxymoron, since the Bible, in it's original languages does not mention Witchcraft, or any word than can reasonably be translated as Witchcraft.

The words Witch and Witchcraft were a mistranslation, probably an intentional one, that King James insisted be included in the version bearing his name.
Well I have found the word Witch in many different Bibles, including the KJV. How do you figure it is a mistranslation and an intentional one? What kind of proof do you have to back this up?
 
Upvote 0

Smilin

Spirit of the Wolf
Jun 18, 2002
5,650
244
59
Appalachia, The Trail of Tears
Visit site
✟30,906.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Lizquests said:
Well I have found the word Witch in many different Bibles, including the KJV. How do you figure it is a mistranslation and an intentional one? What kind of proof do you have to back this up?
http://www.awarenessshop.com/KnowledgeBase/biblicalreferenc.html

Every KJV reference to a witch or witchcraft, the original Hebrew, Latin,
and Greek they were translated from, and what they actually referred to.


I simply state, there is not one valid reference to a 'witch' in the KJV Bible.
 
Upvote 0

Lizquests

Active Member
Nov 21, 2003
217
30
51
Wisconsin
✟536.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Smilin said:
Tea Leaf reading is considered a parlor trick by many, including tarot cards
and ouijah boards.

Consulting or contacting the dead. What does God say about them
contacting us?

Astrology..forbidden by God? pfffttt....it was a sign in the stars
that led the wise men to the birthplace of Jesus. Seems that God
wouldn't use something he forbid.

Astrology has different meanings. I didn't mean the type of looking at the stars/using stars as a guide.

Fortune telling...again a parlor trick by most

Actually I have seen it NOT as a parlor trick. I personally experienced it.

Magic? Tell David Copperfield God doesn't approve.

There is quite a difference between David Copperfield and his illusions and witches or other occults calling on other things but God.

I feel like you are really trying to reach with some of your explanations.

And what constituted witchcraft during that time period? That is KEY
in debating this issue. Yet noone can give a proper definition AND stick
with it for this discussion. You'd also like to consider that over 100,000
humans were executed by the charge of witchcraft during the early
years of the Church by the Roman empire. Political agendas were
the driving factors. Want more details?

It doesn't matter to me what agendas were involved. What matters to me is if someone is practicing magic or not.

Your book sais many things. That believer will take up serpents and drink
poison. That those who abandon their families for Christ will be blessed.
That those who give up their lives for the scriptures will be blessed.

Forgive me if I care too much for my family to drink poison, abandon them,
or blow myself up for Jesus. I'm sure a loving Father would understand.

Again, reading more into this statement. If my family is doing something that is against my Biblical beliefs, I will share the information that I have and hope that their eyes will be opened. Unfortunately, things are slow on that end of it. Some arguements of the family aren't worth getting into with them, but when it comes down to something that is big, if I had to, I would not contact them. I'm glad that I am blessed with a good family.

Those who give up their lives for scripture is wonderful. Meaning to study His word often, and live the way God would want us to live.
BULLDOOKY! My ancestors taught all of the Creation is spiritual.
Demons...pffffttt.... Have you ever met a demon? I've only
experienced spiritual enlightenment from the Creation...nothing demonic.

I haven't met a demon face to face literally, but I have had quite a lot of experiences with them. Demons are out there. Satan exists.

Hmmm...lots of televangelists fall into this category.
And alliance with Santa Clause can lead to transformation into an elf.
Demonic possession is a superstion from the dark ages. We've
explained through psychology mental/personality disorders which
once were classified 'demonic'. The only demons are the ones
we create.

Demons are the ones that are tempting us. We don't create them. Satan tempted Adam and Eve. Or did they just make that up?

Are you Jewish or Christian. Christians aren't bound by the old covenant
are they? The majority of your scriptural quotes are from the OT,
and would only apply to those of the Jewish faith.

I am Non-Denominational Christian. I follow both the Old and New Testament. And they do not only follow the Jewish faith.
Thank you for your concern, yet I am at peace with my own spirituality
and the Divine Creator.
I was at peace also, when I thought that what I was doing at the time was ok.
 
Upvote 0

Volos

Well-Known Member
Jun 25, 2003
3,236
171
59
Michign
✟4,244.00
Faith
Pagan
Marital Status
Married
Originally posted by : Lizquests
I am Non-Denominational Christian. I follow both the Old and New Testament. And they do not only follow the Jewish faith.


A. Under the Law (Old Testament), the punishment was death by stoning.




As I recall that is also the punishment for being gay. Well I am both Pagan and gay so I guess you will be showing up at my door soon to murder me. Question: will you bring your own stones or do I have to provide them for you?
 
Upvote 0

Volos

Well-Known Member
Jun 25, 2003
3,236
171
59
Michign
✟4,244.00
Faith
Pagan
Marital Status
Married
Originally posted by : Lizquests
Even though the definition is hazy, how can it be that people do not see the similarities between words in the bible and witchcraft/witch?




Most likely because what is printed in your bible has nothing to do with my religion or Wicca.


Magic - Witches practice this.
Some do, many do not.



Magic is not limited to Wicca. Most ritual forms of magic stem from Jewish mysticism.


Fortune telling - Some witches use tarot cards.




Some do, most do not.



Most of the Tarot readers I know are Christian.


Sorcery - male form of witches.


Wiccan is a gender neutral term.



the masculine of witch is …witch.
 
Upvote 0

Annabel Lee

Beware the Thought Police
Feb 8, 2002
14,466
1,165
116
Q'onoS
✟46,727.00
Faith
Christian
Politics
US-Others
Upvote 0

Lizquests

Active Member
Nov 21, 2003
217
30
51
Wisconsin
✟536.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Volos said:
[/color][/i]



As I recall that is also the punishment for being gay. Well I am both Pagan and gay so I guess you will be showing up at my door soon to murder me. Question: will you bring your own stones or do I have to provide them for you?
God will be the judge, not me. I haved voiced my opinion on homosexuals as well. But that is a different thread.
 
Upvote 0

Outspoken

Standing in the Gap
Nov 8, 2002
6,441
16
48
✟29,688.00
Faith
Christian
Smilin said:
Noooo... I wasn't ripping things out of context...I just bookmarked it for later
to reference back to. Past behaviors predict future behaviors. I know I'll
remind you of your own words given some of your past behaviors.

And not just your behavior with me.

Have a nice day.
Is easy to see that you're going to rip it out of context. Remind me if you wish, I'll come back and just show you how you ripped it out of context smilin...but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt for now :)
 
Upvote 0

Outspoken

Standing in the Gap
Nov 8, 2002
6,441
16
48
✟29,688.00
Faith
Christian
Havoc said:
Well it's supported by belief, which is hardly a good basis for a claim of absolute truth. Unfortunatly you cannot substantiate the claim so it can therefore be reasonably be regarded as spurious.

I'm not sure about the second half of the statement since I would not be so foolish as to make a claim of absolute truth I couldn't substantiate.
You're wrong on both counts here Havoc. You can't prove the basic wiccan beliefs, which seem to include a creative power in the universe and "We acknowledge a depth of power far greater than that apparent to the average person" or a "three-fold law". None of these things you can prove and are just beliefs. thus you say you hold no beliefs you can't prove, so in the same way i can make the same claim you do in the context of this thread by using your logic. :)Thus my statements stand in context. :)
 
Upvote 0

Havoc

Celtic Witch
Jul 26, 2002
4,652
91
63
Realityville
Visit site
✟29,135.00
Faith
Pagan
Outspoken said:
You're wrong on both counts here Havoc. You can't prove the basic wiccan beliefs, which seem to include a creative power in the universe and "We acknowledge a depth of power far greater than that apparent to the average person" or a "three-fold law". None of these things you can prove and are just beliefs.
I have always said that all religious beliefs, including mine, and yours, are unproveable. Perhaps you should pay a little closer to what I actually say before you get on a soapbox and tell me what I've said.

thus you say you hold no beliefs you can't prove,
I do not say that.

so in the same way i can make the same claim you do in the context of this thread by using your logic. :)Thus my statements stand in context. :)
I'm sorry but that sentance made no grammatical sense at all. If you want to use my logic the only thing you'll be able to safely say is that neither yours nor my beliefs are verifiable or proveable. Since I'm not making any claim of absolute truth that leaves you in a sticky wicket.

You might want to leave advanced wordplay to those who can form coherant sentences. You can't use my words to trap me if you can't reiterate what I say or postulate effectively from it.
 
Upvote 0

Havoc

Celtic Witch
Jul 26, 2002
4,652
91
63
Realityville
Visit site
✟29,135.00
Faith
Pagan
Lizquests said:
Well I have found the word Witch in many different Bibles, including the KJV. How do you figure it is a mistranslation and an intentional one? What kind of proof do you have to back this up?
I'll repost the article I wrote again, although I do wish people would do a search now and then.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

The etymology of the word "Witch" is quite well known. It is Saxon in origin and originally referred to practitioners of The Celtic, Saxon, and Norse religions. The word is derived from the Saxon word "wicce" (pronounced wit-cha), from which is derived the Old English "Witche", and the more modern word "Wicca". These "Witches"were the solitary Village healers and spiritual leaders and were apart from the organised religious structure such as the Druids.

The words used in the Old testament and incorrectly translated as "Witch" refer to the practice of some Hebrew Mystics of the time who used "magic" to curse and harm others. The Hebrews had no contact with the Celts or Saxons and so it is ridiculous to think that your God would have warned the Hebrews to kill people they would never have met. The new testament greek refers to poisoners, not Witches. Witches historically were healers, not killers, and were well respected and sought after.

The use of the word "Witch" to mean any mystical practice that is not Christian is a result of the Witch Panic of the late middle ages, from which King James made much profit and derived no small amount of personal pleasure (more on this later). Christian missionaries continued the practice of labelling anything as Witchcraft even if it had no correspondence with actual Celtic or Saxon Witches.

I can imagine a scene a couple of hundred years ago when the first Christian Missionaries were invading Africa.

"Kimibi, tell those people in that village that we have come to enlighten them."

"Yes Bwana, but they won't like it, they already consider themselves enlightened."

"Well they don't have much choice, we'll save their souls if it kills them. What is that man doing there?"

"Bwana, that man is the Village spiritual leader. He is performing the rituals of the faith of these people. It is called, in their language, Ixpltl."

"Oh, you mean witchcraft."

"What is 'witchcraft' Bwana?"

"That what they are doing."

"Strange Bwana, I don't think it has anything to do with the ancient rituals and traditions of Northern European peoples, but hey, you're the missionary"

Let's say, hypothetically, that the early Hebrews had some people with a gambling problem. Perhaps God might have said "thou shalt not suffer those with a gambling problem to live". If King James then said, "hey... Druids sometimes gamble." and proceeded to have it translated "thou shalt not suffer a Druid to live." would this mean the bible tells you to kill druids? Of course not. Nor would you be justified in calling anyone anywhere who gambles a Druid. But that is basically the sort of thing that happened with the word "Witch".

There are several pieces of evidence that show how the word "witch" was not in the original manuscripts of the Bible, nor any word that could reasonably be translated as "witch". The Hebrew word which is translated as "witch in the King James version is "Kashaph" which, according to Hebrew Scholars, means a person who uses sorcery or poison to harm others.We can see from the following that even before King James time the etymology of the word was known.

From The Discoverie of Witchcraft by Sir Reginald Scott. King James attempted to have all copies of Sir Scott's book destroyed as it contradicted his need to have the word "witch" in the bible (more on that later). Fortunately the book was already in third printing
BOOKE VI
Chapter I - The exposition of this Hebrue word Chasaph, wherein is answered the objection conteined in Exodus 22. to wit: Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live, and of Simon Magus. Acts. 8. page 64) Chaspah, being a Hebrue word, is Latined Veneficium, and is in English, poisoning, or witchcraft; if you will so have it. The Hebrue sentence written in Exodus, 22. is by the 70. interpretors translated thus into Greeke, (sorry-unprintable), which in Latine is, Veneficos (sive) veneficas non retinebitis in vita , in English, You shall not suffer anie poisoners, or (as it is translated) witches to live. The which sentence Josephus an Hebrue borne, and a man of great estimation, learning and fame, interpreteth in this wise; Let none of the children of Israel have any poison that is deadlie, or preparted to anie hurtfull use. If anie be apprehended with such stuffe, let him be put to dfeath, and suffer that which he meant to doo to them, for whom he prepared it. The Rabbins exposition agree heerewithall. Lex Cornelia differeth not from this sense, to wit, that he must suffer to death, which either maketh, selleth, or hath anie poison, to the intent to kill anie man. This word is found in these places following: Exodus. 22, Deut. 18, 10. 2 Sam. 9, 22. Dan. 2,2. 2 Chr. 33, 6. Eay. 47, 9, 12. Malach, 3,5. Jerem. 27, 9, Mich. 5, 2. Nah. 3,4. bis. Howbeit, in all our English translations, Chaspah is translated, witchraft.
The New testament word translated as "witch" is actually "pharmakeia" which means one who uses poisons or drugs. It is the root from which we get our English word "Pharmacy". Of course those Concordances that focus primarily on KJAV will list both words as meaning Witch but that is simply because the KJAV does. Most other translations, most of which are considered more accurate, do not use the word Witch. Here is a cross section reprinted from The Ontario Consultants for religious tolerance.
Interpretation of 19 English translations of Exodus 22:18
Various Biblical translations render this verse as:
American Standard Version "Thou shalt not suffer a sorceress to live."
The Answer: Put to death any woman who does evil magic.
Amplified Bible: You shall not allow a woman to live who practices sorcery.
Good News Version: Put to death any woman who practices magic.
James Moffatt Translation: You shall not allow any sorceress to live.
Jerusalem Bible: You shall not allow a sorceress to live. King James Version: Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live.
Living Bible: A sorceress shall be put to death.
Modern Language Bible: Allow no sorceress to live.
New American Bible: You shall not let a sorceress live.
New American Standard Bible: You shall not let a sorceress live.
New Century Version: Put to death any woman who does evil magic.
New International Version: Do not allow a sorceress to live.
New Living Translation: A sorceress must not be allowed to live.
New Revised Standard Version: You shall not permit a female sorcerer to live.
New World Translation: You must not preserve a sorceress alive.
The Promise: Contemporary English Version: Death is the punishment for witchcraft.
Revised Standard Version: You shall not permit a sorceress to live.
Revised English Bible: You must not allow a witch to live.
In the original Hebrew manuscript, the author used the word m'khashepah to describe the person who should be killed. The word means a woman who uses spoken spells to harm others - e.g. causing their death or loss of property. Clearly "evil sorceress" or "woman who does evil magic" would be the most accurate phrases in current common English usage for this verse.

Interpretation of 22 English Translations of Galatians 5:19-20 Various translations of the Christian Scriptures render this verse as a list of "acts of the sinful nature", or "works of the flesh" and specify the following practices:

American Standard Version: fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness, idolatry, sorcery..."
The Answer: "being sexually unfaithful, not being pure, taking part in sexual sins, worshipping gods, doing witchcraft...."
Amplified Bible: "immorality, impurity, indecency, idolatry, sorcery..."
Authentic New Testament: "adultery, impurity, sensuality, idolatry, sorcery..."
Good News Version: "immoral, filthy and indecent actions; in worship of idols and witchcraft..."
James Moffatt Translation: "sexual vice, impurity, sensuality, idolatry, magic..."
Jerusalem Bible: "fornication, gross indecency and sexual irresponsibility; idolatry and sorcery..."
King James Version: "adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness, idolatry, witchcraft..."
Living Bible: "impure thoughts, eagerness for lustful pleasure, idolatry, spiritism (that is, encouraging the activity of demons),..."
Modern Language Bible: "immorality, impurity, sensuality, idolatry, magic arts...".
New American Bible: immorality, impurity, licentiousness, idolatry, sorcery..."
New American Standard Bible: immorality, impurity, sensuality, idolatry, sorcery..."
New Century Version: being sexually unfaithful, not being pure, taking part in sexual sins, worshipping false gods, doing witchcraft..."
New International Version: "sexual immorality, impurity and debauchery; idolatry and witchcraft..."
New Living Translation: sexual immorality, impure thoughts. eagerness for lustful pleasure, idolatry, participation in demonic activities...."
New Revised Standard Version: fornication, impurity, licentiousness, idolatry, sorcery..."
New Testament & Psalms: An Inclusive Version: "fornication, impurity, licentiousness, idolatry, sorcery..."
New World Translation: fornication, uncleanness, loose conduct, idolatry, practice of spiritism..."
The Promise: Contemporary English Version: "immoral ways, impure thoughts, and shameful deeds. They worship idols, practice witchcraft..."
Rheims New Testament: "fornication, uncleanness, immodesty, luxury, idolatry, witchcrafts..."
Revised Standard Version: fornication, impurity, licentiousness, idolatry, sorcery..."
Revised English Bible: "fonication, indecency, and debauchery; idolatry and sorcery..."
The key word of interest here is the Greek word "pharmakia" from which the English words "pharmacy" "pharmaceuticals," and "pharmacology" are derived. Interpreted literally, it refers to the practice of preparing poisonous potions to harm or kill others.
So it seems that most modern translations of the bible agree that the words should not be translated as Witch. The KJAV seems to be in conflict with scholars of both it's contemprorary and more modern times.

The timeline for the words also do not fit. The word "witch" is derived from various Celtic and Saxon roots which mean variously "to bend" or "wisdom". According to the Scofield Reference Bible this verse from the Hebrew Scriptures (Old Testament) was written in the year 1491 BCE. This is some 650 years before the origin of the Celtic people circa 850 BCE. Add to this that "Witch" refers specifically to practitioners of a set of ancient Northern European and British religions whom the hebrews would have had no chance of encountering then it becomes clear that GOD was warning them about something other than a "Witch".

So why was the word changed to "Witch"? Two reasons are given by historians.

1. King James was not a very morally solid man even by the standards of his days. As well as being a sadist and homosexual he had a tendancy toward underhanded dealings. He believed in the "divine right of Kings", in other words Kings were not subject to laws but answerable only to God. The bible in use by common people of the day, the Geneva Bible, contained what is known as marginal notes, something like a side-by-side concordance and commentary. Many of these marginal notes were critical of Monarchs who followed their own version of morality as did King James. He decreed that the Bishops' Bible, a more politically correct version used by the upper Clergy and lacking marginal notes, be used as the basis for a new translation. The "Authorised" version was to follow the Bishops Bible with as little alteration as possible. The Bishops Bible was criticised by scholars of the time as being less correctly translated than the Geneva Bible.

2. King James Made a considerable sum of money as the Chief Magistrate by accusing people of Witchcraft. The Chief Magistrate was entitled to seize the property and holdings of those accused of Witchcraft. If the person was convicted, which they always were under King James,...
One "witch," Barbara Napier, was acquitted. That event so angered James that he wrote personally to the court on May 10, 1551, ordering a sentence of death, and had the jury called into custody. To make sure they understood their particular offense, the King himself presided at a new hearing - and was gracious enough to release them without punishment when they reversed their verdict. (Global Insights)
...the Chief Magistrate was permitted to keep the property and holdings. King James apparently enjoyed the spectacle of torture as well. He personally supervised the torture of many of the accused and even wrote papers suggesting and devising new methods of torture. It was definately to his advantage to make sure his "authorised" version of the bible specifically contained the word "Witch" as that was the commonly used word surviving in Britain from the time when Witches were the Village healers and Spiritual leaders, before Christianity.

So as we see from historical and biblical perspectives the word "witch" was inserted into the bible in order to persecute Witches in Britain. We can see that there are no words in the original Greek and Hebrew in the bible that can reasonably be translated as "Witch". We also see that most modern translations of the bible, barring those which are merely language modernisations of the KJV, correctly translate the words as being other than "witch".

I hope that clears up the misconception that the bible condems Witches by name. Of course the bible forbids Christians from practicing divination etc, but that is a different matter entirely.
 
Upvote 0

Outspoken

Standing in the Gap
Nov 8, 2002
6,441
16
48
✟29,688.00
Faith
Christian
Havoc said:
I have always said that all religious beliefs, including mine, and yours, are unproveable. Perhaps you should pay a little closer to what I actually say before you get on a soapbox and tell me what I've said.


I do not say that.


I'm sorry but that sentance made no grammatical sense at all. If you want to use my logic the only thing you'll be able to safely say is that neither yours nor my beliefs are verifiable or proveable. Since I'm not making any claim of absolute truth that leaves you in a sticky wicket.

You might want to leave advanced wordplay to those who can form coherant sentences. You can't use my words to trap me if you can't reiterate what I say or postulate effectively from it.
"I have always said that all religious beliefs, including mine, and yours, are unproveable"

then you misspoke here in post 503...
"Well since I'm not making any claims of truth I can't support" or you're saying your beliefs aren't true?

"I'm sorry but that sentance made no grammatical sense at all. "

It makes perfect sense. Read closer ;)

Let me break it down for you then.... so in the same way (just like you) i can make the same claim (you made a claim that you don't have any beliefs that can't be proven) you do in (post 503)the context of this thread (context--you say you have no beliefs you can't prove--I'm taking this as a priori) by using your logic(based on the aprori that you have no beliefs you can't prove).

Soo...I'm still waiting for you to prove those things, or did you mis-speak in post 503 that started this dialogue?

Oh, I don't have to use your words to trap you, you do it quite well yourself, hence they are your words :)
 
Upvote 0

Havoc

Celtic Witch
Jul 26, 2002
4,652
91
63
Realityville
Visit site
✟29,135.00
Faith
Pagan
Outspoken said:
"I have always said that all religious beliefs, including mine, and yours, are unproveable"

then you misspoke here in post 503...
"Well since I'm not making any claims of truth I can't support" or you're saying your beliefs aren't true?

"I'm sorry but that sentance made no grammatical sense at all. "

It makes perfect sense. Read closer ;)

Let me break it down for you then.... so in the same way (just like you) i can make the same claim (you made a claim that you don't have any beliefs that can't be proven) you do in (post 503)the context of this thread (context--you say you have no beliefs you can't prove--I'm taking this as a priori) by using your logic(based on the aprori that you have no beliefs you can't prove).

Soo...I'm still waiting for you to prove those things, or did you mis-speak in post 503 that started this dialogue?

Oh, I don't have to use your words to trap you, you do it quite well yourself, hence they are your words :)
Sigh...

The words "Well since I'm not making any claims of truth I can't support", do not mean I'm saying my beliefs aren't true. They are not saying I don't have any beliefs that can't be proven.

What they DO mean is that I am not making a claim of truth. In other words, I am not saying "Mr Outspoken, the things I believe in are absolutely true and therefore what you believe in are absolutely wrong". That is what a claim of truth would look like. Let's look at it again oK? Do we have it now? Goooooooood.

Do try to keep up next time dear boy.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.