- Aug 18, 2012
- 20,950
- 17,375
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
If you use warmongering rhetoric, I can only assume you want war.
Who used warmongering rehetoric?
Upvote
0
If you use warmongering rhetoric, I can only assume you want war.
Yeah, they're equally off the wall when it comes to reality, imo."Alex Jones? Hannity? " in the same line?
Wait, what? First, the FBI and CIA are not "the left", not even close. Second, that line about did nothing but say "stop it". seems to be another talking point repeated ad nauseum even though - or especially because - it is factually untrue, ie. more propaganda.I have even said that about the left. Its all the things before Trump.. as in Obama/FBI/CIA knew about what Russia was trying to do and did nothing but say "stop it". I do understand how Trump can see this ONLY about him and then say what he did in Russia.
I agree about "watching" the news - what is there to watch - cable news? But there is good old-fashioned reading. But what has that got to do with right-wingers claim that the "media and left", virtually indistinguishable in some minds, want actual war?For me its the out right hate for Trump.. and then watching the things the NEWS has said.. vs..wont say and its as if they want some kind of war with LEFT VS RIGHT or with Russia. To many lies going on.. I dont even watch the news any more. To much FAKE NEWS. Being.. a tad of truth with some truth left out.
Is this an admission that the wants-war claim is meant to be aggravating or do you actually believe this baseless accusation?Why is the left against President Trump's efforts at peace talks with Russia and N. Korea?
Please give an example of warmongering rhetoric.If you use warmongering rhetoric, I can only assume you want war.
For the last 50 years they have hated the American process of making law, abandoning the legislation process, based upon the will of the people, for the legal process, based upon the will of activist courts. They are now in a hysterical frenzy because seeing the age of non legislated law ending. They are terrified of the state populations actually making the laws in the states."Alex Jones? Hannity? " in the same line?
I have even said that about the left. Its all the things before Trump.. as in Obama/FBI/CIA knew about what Russia was trying to do and did nothing but say "stop it". I do understand how Trump can see this ONLY about him and then say what he did in Russia.
For me its the out right hate for Trump.. and then watching the things the NEWS has said.. vs..wont say and its as if they want some kind of war with LEFT VS RIGHT or with Russia. To many lies going on.. I dont even watch the news any more. To much FAKE NEWS. Being.. a tad of truth with some truth left out.
Please give an example of warmongering rhetoric.
You are aware, are you not, that an agreement to negotiate a final agreement, isn´t a final agreement, aren´t you ? Historically have broken down in negotiation quite often. They also have succeeded as well. We are at the stage of agreeing to negotiate and good will gestures, a long way to go to a fully negotiated and ratified treaty.Not to mention the fact that it does not appear that NK is doing anything 'promised' to the great deal maker.
Who used warmongering rehetoric?
Please give an example of warmongering rhetoric.
Is that like Obama's red line? No sane person (Dem or Republican) wants war including Putin. Most of the talk is rhetoric.During the second debate, Hillary Clinton called for imposing a no fly zone over Syria. Since the Russians had already installed some of their best air defense artillery there, such a policy could have easily facilitated World War III.
Even if the election of Trump did not prevent World War III, it certainly prevented Cold War II.
Cyber retaliation? Maybe?People have referred to Russia's alleged cyberattacks as acts of war, and advocated retaliation against Russia.
During the second debate, Hillary Clinton called for imposing a no fly zone over Syria. Since the Russians had already installed some of their best air defense artillery there, such a policy could have easily facilitated World War III.
Even if the election of Trump did not prevent World War III, it certainly prevented Cold War II.
For the last 50 years they have hated the American process of making law, abandoning the legislation process, based upon the will of the people, for the legal process, based upon the will of activist courts. They are now in a hysterical frenzy because seeing the age of non legislated law ending. They are terrified of the state populations actually making the laws in the states.
For the Right there is no middle ground.
And did you read the article?
If you read the article and actually believe that they are calling for any kind of nuclear retaliation or conventional military response, then you simply don't know how to comprehend what you read. The key word with what you quote mined is "accordingly" which means "corresponding". To respond to a cyber/political attack with nuclear weapons is absurd and obviously contrary to the good general's point.[I said:Lt. Gen. Mark Hertling and Molly K. McKew[/I]]A dozen seasoned Russian military intelligence officers conducted hacking and infiltration operations against U.S. political parties and state elections infrastructure, including voter rolls and registration systems. They established false identifies, covered their trail and used cryptocurrency to hide the origin of their operations. These units created false personas that successfully masqueraded as journalists, other hackers, and other influencers, and they built out the infrastructure of a fictitious “hacktivist” group to release materials stolen from the DNC. The indictment also explains that these GRU cells were generating their own revenue to conduct these operations, both by mining bitcoin and by diverting donations from the Democratic Party via a spoofed webpage. That is true evil genius.
Proxy or official, the Russian operatives were able to create “American” personas that interacted freely with American voters, journalists, activists—and campaign officials. They also seemed to have considerable knowledge of how to target and parse American audiences. All of this was subversive and deceptive—but done right out in the open. It was targeting American society and individuals in a way that bypassed the existing system of protections, including those inherent in our own decision-making.