• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Why did America allow slavery?

Halbhh

Everything You say is Life to me
Site Supporter
Mar 17, 2015
17,340
9,285
catholic -- embracing all Christians
✟1,245,841.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
People can be a slave to sin. But before the civil war, we had what they call chattel when one person owned another. How could anyone ever think something like this should be legal? They talk about slavery in the Bible, but that had to do with debt and you could only hold a person for 7 years. Then you had to set them free. If it was a prisoner of war the Jubilee was every 50 years. So no matter what, slavery could not go from generation to generation the way it did in Southern or Rebel America.
More broadly, including also of course for captured or purchased chattel slaves, the essence of the Law was just as Christ said in Matthew 12:

"So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets." -- Christ our Lord in Matthew 7

Now, Jesus understood the Old Testament law better than you and I, right, so...we can take his word for it that this correctly sums up or is the essence of the Law, if we trust him or believe in him. Make sense?

Ergo, it's not merely that an ancient Israelite should refrain from beating their slave to death....(which would incur a serious punishment against them), but more than only that...those that feared God long ago should already treat their slave precisely as they themselves would want to be treated if the positions were reversed.

This is how it was for those that really feared God enough to listen to prophets:

“Is not this the kind of fasting I have chosen: to loose the chains of injustice and untie the cords of the yoke, to set the oppressed free and break every yoke?" -- The Lord God in Isaiah 58:6 - True Fasts and Sabbaths
 
Upvote 0

studentinprayer

Active Member
Mar 8, 2023
38
4
40
Westren Canada / Nashville TN
✟28,317.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Your posts about US history and slavery have been largely incoherent, and frequently wrong. That is why I wrote "WHAT?".
I get why you wrote "WHAT?". It read like gobbly-gook. You’re probably not the only one, it’s why I am thankful you responded.

I am curious about something else. History as a narrative is harshly debated with a limited amount of objective facts. This is a discussion forum amongst people who mostly have read little to none of that debate and vaguely know the facts. My posts, the one you quoted no exception, have been mostly opinion statements in a narrative style.

You say I am frequently wrong and maybe your right, but it makes me very curious why your so confident you have the correct history. Education? Do you mind if I ask at what level. Personal reading? Do you mind if I ask highlights.
According to your profile your aren't any kind of American, you're a Canadian.
I have duel citizenship and live back and forth. I consider myself more American, but I am more historically Canadian as that is my family background and where I grew up.
 
Upvote 0

coffee4u

Well-Known Member
Dec 11, 2018
5,002
2,819
Australia
✟174,175.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
We are not talking about the world, we are talking about the united states. Hopefully we can set an example for the world on how we are to live our lives.
Slavery was a world wide thing not just a US thing.
So you think they were justified in what they did?
Who was justified in what exactly?
Nobody is justified to sin.

People with luxury and privilege still have problems. But no one has any compassion for them. No one wants to hear about rich people problems. They listen to the poor because they think the poor are exploited. But my son has no compassion for the poor. He thinks they should work harder to take advantage of their opportunities.
No one said they didn't but they need to put their problems into perspective. They need to appreciate how privileged they are.
Some of the poor do certainly, others are already working hard at two jobs and still poor. Some have health issues, some are disabled, some are of lower then normal IQ, there are all sorts of reasons someone might be poor.
 
Upvote 0

Diamond72

Dispensationalist 72
Nov 23, 2022
8,303
1,522
73
Akron
✟57,941.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Slavery was a world wide thing not just a US thing.
You like to comment and my main point had to do with young girls being raped or coerced into having sex. As I noted women free and slave were expected to have four or five children by the time they were 20. Was this really legal? Today it is getting to the point where men can get 12 years in prison for doing whatever it is they do to minors. Dugger got 12 years just for having porn on his computer at work.

There were laws against importing slaves so they had to breed them here in this country. Some people report that Louisville produced 5,000 slaves a year to be sold down the river.

337262751_1749548082127753_1574632640864502158_n.jpg
 
Upvote 0

Diamond72

Dispensationalist 72
Nov 23, 2022
8,303
1,522
73
Akron
✟57,941.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
those that feared God long ago should already treat their slave precisely as they themselves would want to be treated if the positions were reversed.
Yes, that is what I said. If good people treat their animals well, then all the more should we treat people well. We do not see enough of that today with a warmonger government that encourages abortion.
 
Upvote 0

Halbhh

Everything You say is Life to me
Site Supporter
Mar 17, 2015
17,340
9,285
catholic -- embracing all Christians
✟1,245,841.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Yes, that is what I said. If good people treat their animals well, then all the more should we treat people well. We do not see enough of that today with a warmonger government that encourages abortion.
Sadly, if evil is not contested, it simply thrives and spreads. So, it's not possible before Christ returns for a nation to disarm safely, as if there were no aggressive leaders in other nations, like Putin.
If NATO didn't help Ukraine...and if Putin isn't stopped in Ukraine, then Putin will definitely continue, with Moldovia next, and perhaps after that the Balkans look very much like part of the old empire he imagines should be reconstituted... So, you'd see Molodivia, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and so on, and then perhaps the Balkans in that scenario where NATO wasn't reacting already, because NATO would look weak, and so the Balkans even would look easy to imagine taking...

You can get a sense of this from street interviews with Russians. Would you like to see some?
 
Upvote 0

Ana the Ist

Aggressively serene!
Feb 21, 2012
39,990
12,573
✟487,130.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
I’ve read a few of your posts now, and I am starting to observe your on a deep journey to do better. To craft yourself into a true man of God. I can’t wait to hear more about your findings.

In this context, I take your deeper question with this thread to be: we’ve all heard it said systemic racism is the root of a lot of evils and correcting it can make society better. How can we do better in that light.

To respond to that in the American context, I would first like to clarify some history, which is rarely contextualize in regards to this subject.

In the Dixie south, who were the ‘insiders’ and ‘outsiders’? The establishment was who one might call good-southern boys and belles, by contrast to the north this was an aristocratic sort preferring a democratized old European style court to that of the more humble stuffy puritan-quaker built north. They valued being clever and politically connected. Appearance was everything. Being an outsider often worse than anything. Unlike the north, the Military was a huge institution. In this way, militaristic ideas and solutions were more prevalent.

I'd add that the protestant work ethnic of the northeast also seemed lack, though I'm unsure why.

The common folk(outsiders) to whom this establishment was disconnected one might call hillbillies(Cajun french canadians, southern Irish, cowboys, farm boys, mountain folk) this group cared little about politics. Their culture was the tribe.They wanted to be left alone. Be independent. But they have all the culture, the songs, the stories, the grit, the fighting spirit that made the army strong. So don't think they are not visible or influential.

They effectively had a subculture...but I think there's three things key to remember. Disdain for education and reading, fervently religious, unskilled and poor. As such, their meager lives were adapted to the conditions of the land. If work could be found on a plantation, it was as a petty worker or overseer. Though uneducated, they would have learned and created racist tropes this way. The term cracker literally refers to these folks who probably learned that harshness might find them employment. Largely though, we're talking about a population that knew few trades.


The civil war despite affecting everyone was between southern and northern elites. It was not a southern slave revolt. It was just another call to arms for the southern hillbillies. Because of that, the deeper wound for those ex-slave blacks was being cast out without warning, ritual, preparation, political power or organization.

There was a startling amount of fondness in this time found in the words of some blacks for slavery. Some remember it as a time of few worries or concerns (not unlike being in any institution where you are expected to obey authorities). Others immediately began taking advantage of their new status....having more skill in the basics of farming or other trades than their hillbilly counterparts. I can only imagine it as a deep source of resentment in the minds of those already poor whites.


Millions made homeless/destitute without community leaders, meaningful suffrage or support. A wise America would have given them a state and assistance to grow instead resentment and prejudice over a costly war done in their name.

Ever hear of Liberia?


American blacks are an industrious community despite many barriers they began to build up and make a culture of their own. Their strongest allies in the south, the hillbillies were embraced making a parallel culture due to a politically enforced racial segregation which spread nation-wide. Not all though were so unpolitical, hardened by war with the racist southern establishment another culture emerged in the black south: racial identitarians, who rally against two groups black hillbillies(who make them look bad) and the white establishment(their natural opponent). Others blacks more industrialist than hillbilly culture allows but not interested in the racial black identitarians moved west/north. This culture of this mostly middle-class blacks marked by facing a lie they were told as children about their journey out of the black enclaves into other white-majority cultures: when racism isn’t in the open, it's often still done with a smile.

I can imagine that living in the south and hearing of the "free north" idealized it to show degree. It would have been a disappointment to find out they're racist too....but their arguments more educated.


Meanwhile, the southern power balance began to shift. The old southern democrats were about to get wiped out by the new power bases which rising up from the hillbillies, black identitarians and non-southern immigrates (who embraced southern culture but not her politics - also sometimes deemed the looming republican majority).

Southern democrats are a pragmatic bunch, so they changed their coalition to try and keep power bringing in the black identitarians and shifting their target audience to disaffected middle-classes like the formerly mentioned blacks living white majority-culture. It was easy, republican leadership were dominated by an out-of-touch industrialist class and far from nimble and politically savvy. This is also why you see the democratic swing in the black vote even before the democratic party embraced civil rights and dropped it’s anti-black positions and why you saw republican black support disappear as they ignore even basic poltical concerns from the black community.

I think you're correct about all this...but it's very much an incomplete picture. Wealthy southern whites literally lost wealth as slaves weren't cheap to buy. Poor whites were engaged in land grabs....and resented losing those opportunities to blacks when it happened. Black enclaves formed quickly....and were able to elect their own local and state legislators quicker than many people realized. This slowed down though....because in many cases, it was tantamount to a death sentence.


So…

You see ‘white guilt’ is actually designed to enforce racial divisions.

I think part of the problem is we speak of race at all.

Systemic racism is very much real, but is as much about expectations as any racist action. Outsiders aren’t trusted like insiders and so we have systemic racism which will happen anytime your a racial minority.

I suppose that's possible...but I'll be honest, in-group and out-group dynamics aren't necessarily going to result in widespread persecution.

Regardless...I've never seen systemic racism described that way.

It something to learn, but it really only requires simple awareness the correction is good social skills not being a werido about it, which unfortunately we’re very bad at teaching and doing.

I have always taken the position of being my honest self regardless of being unfamiliar to the group or not. When you change your demeanor to imitate someone else in a noticeable way....I always take it as condescending.


In terms of feeling it in their blood. I doubt that is a historic wound. It’s the fact black children are vividly told they are hunted down by white people on a daily basis. Any child would feel race anger if they were told all the crazy visual and vivild violent things blacks are told about whites on the daily by tv, internet and conversation. In terms of your feelings, your told those same stories bur identify with a different character.

In terms, of the problems of black majority cities. It all steams from that terrible democratic coalition mixed with a feckless and useless republican opposition which makes no effort to incorporate black communities. Single party administration is always terrible be it left/right, black/white, woman/man etc etc.

I can't pin it down to one thing. I've heard Sowell's explanations of the cultural exchange of black and impoverished or hillbilly whites....and I can understand why he sees it. Church, disdain towards education, honor culture....there's elements of these things in certain ways in poor urban black culture. It's just an insufficient explanation....I can't discount the crack epidemic, which followed the loss of manufacturing. I can't discount the full range of the civil rights movement...with it's rapidly increasing militancy and refusal to accept a cultural future with whites. We remember MLK because he was the most successful. He wasn't the sole influence though...and Malcolm X made clear the line being big B Black politically and just black. His field slave house slave speech drew a line between black communities and whites ever since. Since then, it's arguably the worst racial epithet a black man can call another. There's no similar white corollary....and the neo nazi "race traitor" simply didn't have the same effect. The resulting message was that emulating, assimilating, or seeking paths forward by cooperation with whites meant you were in the house....not to be trusted.

In the minds of some black communities...I suspect that to do as white people do is seen as something akin to "selling out" or betrayal to the black community. It's an issue that seems to complicate their self conception the more they get wealthy.

Problems with American blacks in statistics. Hillbilly culture espeically when moved into an urban environment. You move any hillbilly to any city, they don't thrive. The sad thing is this culture isn't even a majority(just more culturally relevant), most middle-class blacks just get painted with that brush by embracing their blackness no different from any middle-class white southerner who embraces their southren-ness.

About half of blacks are considered "middle class", no?

I think the perpetual view of a completely impoverished race is one held by upper middle to upper class whites. Lack of exposure and a persistent media narrative has left them ignorant of reality.

Both my parents grew up in what we'd probably call "extreme poverty" and came from a poorly educated region best described as "NE Appalachian Hillbilly" and despite this, my mother and father along with 4 of their siblings escaped poverty...the other 4 not so much. They moved into urban areas and succeeded by learning a trade that was in demand, regardless of whether they enjoyed it, and worked quite hard.


And btw, I love hillbillies

No particular love nor hatred of them here. I simply cannot relate well to those relatives.



and just as I can easily live in the rural south by showing respect and keeping to my own business.

For some reason, I've always found N Carolinans extremely hospitable and courteous. Noticeably so.


I can thrive in those urban environments with the same norms. Race has nothing to do with it.

I'll be honest....I know it's wrong to feel so....but once I hear that strong southern accent, I instantly assume that person is slightly dumber than average. I have to remind myself it's not a reasonable assumption.

I'm not particularly fond of big cities....or perhaps it's just people in general. I tend to look at anyone who proudly proclaims their birthplace as somewhat ignorant. New York is a dump. LA is a cultural joke. And the only people proud of Texas are Texans. I know you think you can secede any time you want....but you can't.


Anyway, hopefully you or someone else finds somthing useful in my too long overly analytical post. I look forward to this no unforgiveness.

I think you did a good job. Can't summarize 150 years of race relations in one post. I don't think you perhaps realized how it came off....but would I be right in guessing that you deliberately chose to speak about things many US citizens don't know? We all have an overly simplistic understanding of the antebellum, civil war, restoration, civil rights periods.
 
Upvote 0

Ana the Ist

Aggressively serene!
Feb 21, 2012
39,990
12,573
✟487,130.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
According to your profile your aren't any kind of American, you're a Canadian.

Did Canada break away from N America or something?
Your posts about US history and slavery have been largely incoherent, and frequently wrong. That is why I wrote "WHAT?".

What part do you think was wrong?
 
Upvote 0

Diamond72

Dispensationalist 72
Nov 23, 2022
8,303
1,522
73
Akron
✟57,941.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Thomas Jefferson, prior to 1800, even wrote that sooner or later God would punish them for it.
Jefferson treated his slave like a wife and even gave freedom to her children. I wonder how people could sell their own children into slavery. They would talk about one drop of blood. Even if they were only 1/8 black they could still be considered a slave. The civil war had a lot more to do with setting white people free. This is still a sensitive issue today. On the census people are whatever they want to declare themselves to be.
Your son needs to spend some more time among the world's poor.
His mom is from the Philippines, so he knows all about how opportunities can be few and far apart. He really has no understanding of people that squander their resources and do not take advantage of their opportunities. He considers himself a Filipino. Kind of strange that you do not think Filipinos understand poverty.
buys his own slaves."
Slaves were often put in charge of the slaves. Women were expected to have four or five kids by the time they were 20 then they raised the free and the slave children together. WE see this in the movie gone with the wind. Missy was a slave girl so she had to serve her sister. Mammy was the cook and she raised and disciplined the children. Many slave owners believed that their slaves were a part of their family, or at least presented this view publicly as a way to justify their ownership of human beings.

Trauma is not genetic.
Actually, it is, but that should be the subject of another thread.
 
Upvote 0

Ana the Ist

Aggressively serene!
Feb 21, 2012
39,990
12,573
✟487,130.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Slavery devalued the labor of white men, including skilled labor.

True.

That was certainly understood at the time...the "cheap labor" of slavery was the reason Northern white men fought against its extension into the new Western territories and states.

I'm sure that's part of it....but it depends upon where you were economically. Upper class whites in the north generally preferred the idea of conceding to southern demands if it avoided war. When southern white leaders basically refused any concessions at all....it was taken as an offense....and when war became inevitable, northern whites previously willing to allow some slavery to continue changed their position accordingly.


It's interesting that Southern white men were willing to fight and die for a system that kept them poor.

Well they were also ignorant. It's interesting to me that southern slave owners were willing to arm slaves in desperation towards the end. I don't know if any saw combat. Someone should remake Glory from the perspective of one of the southern black regiments....except as a comedy, call it "You Want Me To Do What?"
 
Upvote 0

coffee4u

Well-Known Member
Dec 11, 2018
5,002
2,819
Australia
✟174,175.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You like to comment and my main point had to do with young girls being raped or coerced into having sex. As I noted women free and slave were expected to have four or five children by the time they were 20. Was this really legal? Today it is getting to the point where men can get 12 years in prison for doing whatever it is they do to minors. Dugger got 12 years just for having inappropriate content on his computer at work.

There were laws against importing slaves so they had to breed them here in this country. Some people report that Louisville produced 5,000 slaves a year to be sold down the river.

View attachment 329788
And this is still happening because the problem is a human one, not a uniquly US one. Sin and how evil the human mind can be will always be with us until the Lord returns.
 
Upvote 0

RDKirk

Alien, Pilgrim, and Sojourner
Site Supporter
Mar 3, 2013
42,907
23,613
US
✟1,806,350.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Jefferson treated his slave like a wife and even gave freedom to her children.

Jefferson was a pig when it came to racial matters. Jefferson wrote that blacks were incapable of delicate emotions such as love, only bestial lusts...which tells you how he really felt about Sarah Hemings. She was essentially on the level of his prize mare. When he took her (at the age of 14) with him to France, he faced the problem that in non-slave France, she could merely walk away from him. So, he made her a "bargain" that if she stayed with him in France and returned with him to slavery to America, he would free her children. In fact, he only freed one of them while he was alive. Two of them escaped, one purchased his freedom, and the others were freed after his death.

Jefferson publicly insulted the noted black poet Phyllis Wheatley, saying her work was ugly and crude. He also had a running feud with black architect and almanac author Benjamin Banneker, claiming that Banneker's almanac was worthless...but while in France, Jefferson claimed he was actually the author of Banneker's almanac.

His mom is from the Philippines, so he knows all about how opportunities can be few and far apart. He really has no understanding of people that squander their resources and do not take advantage of their opportunities. He considers himself a Filipino. Kind of strange that you do not think Filipinos understand poverty.
I've lived several years in the Philippines. Your son might consider himself Filipino, but if he doesn't understand how the economy of the Philippines keeps them in poverty, then he understands less about the Philippines than I do.

But then, I also studied economics at the University of the Philippines while I was there, and I was also a student of their politics. I was there during the People's Revolution that ousted Ferdinand Marcos (and had a minor hand in removing him from the country).
 
Upvote 0

Diamond72

Dispensationalist 72
Nov 23, 2022
8,303
1,522
73
Akron
✟57,941.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
which tells you how he really felt about Sarah Hemings. She was essentially on the level of his prize mare.
Yet they claim they were all one big happy family. Perhaps they were all one big dysfunctional family. So are you saying they treated their animals better than they treated their slaves?

In the case of Patty Hearst, she served 2 years in prison because the judge did not buy into Stockholm syndrome.
 
Upvote 0

Diamond72

Dispensationalist 72
Nov 23, 2022
8,303
1,522
73
Akron
✟57,941.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
And this is still happening because the problem is a human one
There are situations where men have 16 kids. I wonder how many of the girls are so desperate for their father to be a part of their life that they would be willing to do anything to get his love and attention. Of course, none of that matters in court.
 
Upvote 0

RDKirk

Alien, Pilgrim, and Sojourner
Site Supporter
Mar 3, 2013
42,907
23,613
US
✟1,806,350.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Yet they claim they were all one big happy family. Perhaps they were all one big dysfunctional family. So are you saying they treated their animals better than they treated their slaves?

In the case of Patty Hearst, she served 2 years in prison because the judge did not buy into Stockholm syndrome.

If Sally Hemmings had been a slave of her own free will, Jefferson would not have had to promise that he'd free her children to keep her from walking away while they were in France. "Freedom" would not have been her aspiration for her children. Hemmings agreed to remain a slave so that her children could be free. Unfortunately, Jefferson reneged on that agreement.

When one person is a slave, there is no question of free will consent. That's what "slave" means.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Larniavc

"Larniavc sir, how are you so smart?"
Jul 14, 2015
15,946
9,734
53
✟417,860.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
People can be a slave to sin. But before the civil war, we had what they call chattel when one person owned another. How could anyone ever think something like this should be legal? They talk about slavery in the Bible, but that had to do with debt and you could only hold a person for 7 years. Then you had to set them free. If it was a prisoner of war the Jubilee was every 50 years. So no matter what, slavery could not go from generation to generation the way it did in Southern or Rebel America.
No, you could have non Hebrew slaves forever and you could beat them to death as long as they took a bit to die.

The reason for slavery is because it is cheaper than paying to work.
 
Upvote 0

BNR32FAN

He’s a Way of life
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2017
26,265
8,538
Dallas
✟1,145,917.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
People can be a slave to sin. But before the civil war, we had what they call chattel when one person owned another. How could anyone ever think something like this should be legal? They talk about slavery in the Bible, but that had to do with debt and you could only hold a person for 7 years. Then you had to set them free. If it was a prisoner of war the Jubilee was every 50 years. So no matter what, slavery could not go from generation to generation the way it did in Southern or Rebel America.
Well that’s actually correct, only Jewish men had to be released after 7 years not women & children but the root of the problem is that wicked men have often tried to use the scriptures to justify their wickedness. It’s been going on for thousands of years. I imagine it will only get worse before Christ returns.
 
Upvote 0

Halbhh

Everything You say is Life to me
Site Supporter
Mar 17, 2015
17,340
9,285
catholic -- embracing all Christians
✟1,245,841.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
From a Christian point of view, the problem with American slavery was the attempt to justify it based on the Old Testament.

I find it interesting that such justification only appeared after 1800 or so. Prior to that time, even Southern slaveholders were willing to admit that slavery was a sin against God. At one point during the Constitutional Convention, all the delegates from slaveholding states except those from South Carolina had agreed to put abolition language into the Constitution. Thomas Jefferson, prior to 1800, even wrote that sooner or later God would punish them for it.

Something changed in a big way around 1800 to cause slaveholders to stop seeing slavery as a sin and begin attempting to use the Old Testament to justify it (even after Christians in the rest of the world had found in scripture the argument for abolition).
Very interesting. I'm curious to read more on that pre-1800 admitting slavery is wrong among the delegates or other such instances in the South. Is there a handy article you can point me towards?
 
Upvote 0

studentinprayer

Active Member
Mar 8, 2023
38
4
40
Westren Canada / Nashville TN
✟28,317.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Thanks for the thoughtful comments.

I am still very much in the process of pondering the issue as a way of understanding the current political situation. At this stage I’ve thought, read, and listened to a lot of information and opinions on the subject but rarely got to discuss or write on it.

Ever hear of Liberia?

Some. And her history (specifically the ways ex American-slaves treated native Africans) influenced my thoughts on why politically minded southern blacks built their political machine the way they did.

I suppose that's possible...but I'll be honest, in-group and out-group dynamics aren't necessarily going to result in widespread persecution.

Regardless...I've never seen systemic racism described that way.

Fair enough. For me hearing stories and spending time in China completely changed my views on racism, systemic or otherwise. It's a very openly racist society there is not much subtly to it.

....but would I be right in guessing that you deliberately chose to speak about things many US citizens don't know?
Certainly. My posts are trying to rectify diamond7 more conventional lens where he sees this part of our past as satanic evils with visuals like "shackles on her ankles" and systemic rape where as in my view I mostly see the evils of indifference, American slavery just another example and call to do something about modern day slavery and exploitation. I use historic framing, as I find that is where views radically diverge. People with different experiences see the same events differently and without a shift in that frame to a shared one there can be no agreement or learning.
 
Upvote 0