No, it hasn't been discussed at length...it's been discussed, but then as soon as the context is mentioned, certain people simply just ignore the replies and move on to a different thread to trot out the "Charlie Kirk doesn't trust Black pilots" (hoping to get more mileage and likes there in a different thread)
Again...for the 4th time...
His position was that:
In an environment where a certain amount of hiring is based on trying to fill certain quotas, and that initiative trumps "getting the most qualified person", that represents a lowering of the bar by ending up with a larger percentage of people on-staff who simply met the minimum requirements rather than the person who was the best candidate compared to all other candidates.
"Meets the qualifications" is different than "the best"
If a hospital was hiring brain surgeons, and they had a quota where "we have to get at least 5 Pittsburgh Steelers fans on-staff in the neurosurgery department, that's number 1 priority above all else" If I see my surgeon roll up in a Steelers hat and jersey, I'm going to be skeptical. That doesn't mean I hate Steelers fans or think that a Steelers fan isn't capable of being a good brain surgeon. It simply means I realize that if their organization said "no matter what, it'd gotta be a Steelers fan", that very likely means they could've passed over dozens of other more well qualified applicants in order to fill a quota.
Charlie Kirk's position was that if there were no DEI quotas in hiring, and it was all 100% based on who is the best (meritocracy), he'd have no problem with a Black pilot. It's the programs themselves that prioritize other aspects than "who's the best" that made him skeptical.