Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
No, our only virtue comes from God working in us. Salvation certainly doesn't depend on us being good enough to deserve saving.Then what is it actually about?
Ok, so you're admitting that in either case, virtue is necessary for salvation, yes? If you have to be a virtuous Christian to go to heaven, why can't you be a virtuous agnostic and go to heaven?
@renniks No offense, I've read it all before, the semantics and sin-account make sense on paper, but I just don't see how all this maps on to reality; onto real, human life. How is believing in Jesus going to change my life in some way that I can't if I were a stoic theist?
I look at the Christians, and I compare them with the stoics like Epictetus, Cicero, Aurelius, et al, and I don't see any major differences in either their ethics nor their lifestyle. People of both schools of thought demonstrate an understanding and embodiment of transcendent value, of sacrifice, and of virtue.
The reason I don't believe Christianity is true is because the doctrine is not reasonable. God is inherently rational. John says "in the beginning was the Logos and the Logos was with God and the Logos was God.". That makes sense to me, but I don't see any reason why God would have to become flesh in order to forgive us for our sins. If God really does embody the values of forgiveness that Jesus preached (and I believe he does) then why can't he just forgive us? Why does he have to become flesh and die and we have to "believe" it in order for it to take effect? It just seems absurd.
I appreciate you taking the time to explain it but I just don't get it
Well because we could never be perfect or sinless so we could never earn salvation on our own merit. Jesus offers us the gift of salvation based on His righteousness not ours. All we need to do is believe the Gospel.I don't understand why we are saved by faith rather than by our works?
What is "salvation"? To me, salvation could mean a couple of things:
1. Being "free" from sin (no one is sinless, so I guess "free" here means that we are approaching sinlessnes)
2. Eternally striving for the Good, for self-improvement (less sin). A sort of eternal striving in the godward direction.
Is that correct? And if so, why is belief in Jesus the only way that we can be "saved"
Faith saves because when we place our faith (belief, trust, reliance) in Jesus Christ for salvation, then we are accounted as righteous before God. Romans 4:5 - But to him who does not work but believes on Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is accounted for righteousness, 6 just as David also describes the blessedness of the man to whom God imputes righteousness apart from works.I don't mean any offense, but this is just rhetoric. You're not explaining how or why the faith actually saves, and what it even means to be saved. This is just word salad.
Let us look at the quote from St. Paul:
"being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus:" let's pick this apart.
"being justified". "justified" means "declared or made righteous in the sight of God" according to a quick google definition.
"by his grace". As far as I know, God's grace is like "God acting in/through us"
"through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus". This part I just don't understand.
Could you explain what this verse means? Also, can you give a definition of "salvation" because I have this idea that salvation is overcoming of sin by loving and striving for the Good, but I don't understand what Christians mean when they use the term.
@renniks No offense, I've read it all before, the semantics and sin-account make sense on paper, but I just don't see how all this maps on to reality; onto real, human life. How is believing in Jesus going to change my life in some way that I can't if I were a stoic theist?
I look at the Christians, and I compare them with the stoics like Epictetus, Cicero, Aurelius, et al, and I don't see any major differences in either their ethics nor their lifestyle. People of both schools of thought demonstrate an understanding and embodiment of transcendent value, of sacrifice, and of virtue.
The reason I don't believe Christianity is true is because the doctrine is not reasonable. God is inherently rational. John says "in the beginning was the Logos and the Logos was with God and the Logos was God.". That makes sense to me, but I don't see any reason why God would have to become flesh in order to forgive us for our sins. If God really does embody the values of forgiveness that Jesus preached (and I believe he does) then why can't he just forgive us? Why does he have to become flesh and die and we have to "believe" it in order for it to take effect? It just seems absurd.
I appreciate you taking the time to explain it but I just don't get it
Perhaps what you are missing is that this is relational. Beliving Jesus is who he says he is, leads to a relationship with him.@renniks No offense, I've read it all before, the semantics and sin-account make sense on paper, but I just don't see how all this maps on to reality; onto real, human life. How is believing in Jesus going to change my life in some way that I can't if I were a stoic theist?
I look at the Christians, and I compare them with the stoics like Epictetus, Cicero, Aurelius, et al, and I don't see any major differences in either their ethics nor their lifestyle. People of both schools of thought demonstrate an understanding and embodiment of transcendent value, of sacrifice, and of virtue.
The reason I don't believe Christianity is true is because the doctrine is not reasonable. God is inherently rational. John says "in the beginning was the Logos and the Logos was with God and the Logos was God.". That makes sense to me, but I don't see any reason why God would have to become flesh in order to forgive us for our sins. If God really does embody the values of forgiveness that Jesus preached (and I believe he does) then why can't he just forgive us? Why does he have to become flesh and die and we have to "believe" it in order for it to take effect? It just seems absurd.
I appreciate you taking the time to explain it but I just don't get it
>Salvation exists in no one else
What is the definition of salvation?
>His death paid the price we could NEVER pay
Why can't we repay God by genuine repentance and good works? In other words, by being virtuous.
If the "debt" is already paid, then why do we have to believe?
I don't understand why we are saved by faith rather than by our works?
What is "salvation"? To me, salvation could mean a couple of things:
1. Being "free" from sin (no one is sinless, so I guess "free" here means that we are approaching sinlessnes)
2. Eternally striving for the Good, for self-improvement (less sin). A sort of eternal striving in the godward direction.
Is that correct? And if so, why is belief in Jesus the only way that we can be "saved"
Faith is trust. To trust in God (above yourself, above your local pastor, above politicians, above doctrine D2.1, above bishops, above friends, loved ones, other various wisdom ideas, and so on...).I don't understand why we are saved by faith rather than by our works?
What is "salvation"? To me, salvation could mean a couple of things:
1. Being "free" from sin (no one is sinless, so I guess "free" here means that we are approaching sinlessnes)
2. Eternally striving for the Good, for self-improvement (less sin). A sort of eternal striving in the godward direction.
Is that correct? And if so, why is belief in Jesus the only way that we can be "saved"
Salvation is release from the justice of God on one's sin, which is eternal death.I don't understand why we are saved by faith rather than by our works?
What is "salvation"? To me, salvation could mean a couple of things:
1. Being "free" from sin (no one is sinless, so I guess "free" here means that we are approaching sinlessnes)
2. Eternally striving for the Good, for self-improvement (less sin). A sort of eternal striving in the godward direction.
Is that correct? And if so, why is belief in Jesus the only way that we can be "saved"
I don't understand why we are saved by faith rather than by our works?
Although your definitions (1 & 2) sound reasonable, I don't agree with them. I believe what the Bible says about salvation which is:I don't understand why we are saved by faith rather than by our works?
What is "salvation"? To me, salvation could mean a couple of things:
1. Being "free" from sin (no one is sinless, so I guess "free" here means that we are approaching sinlessnes)
2. Eternally striving for the Good, for self-improvement (less sin). A sort of eternal striving in the godward direction.
Is that correct? And if so, why is belief in Jesus the only way that we can be "saved"
There is a teaching of Jesus recorded in Mark 4:1-20 which explains that the "kingdom" of God is a mystery and some will see but not perceive, some will hear and not understand. Faith, belief, understanding is all given by God to every person in God's timing and in God's way. While other people can come alongside you to explain in the best way that we know how, true insight and understanding will come to you from God as you continue to pursue him directly in prayer and the continued study of Scripture. Understanding God is neither fully linear nor fully logical according to our standards and we must come to a place of being willing to accept this - hence the term "faith".I appreciate you taking the time to explain it but I just don't get it
I don't understand why we are saved by faith rather than by our works?
What is "salvation"? To me, salvation could mean a couple of things:
1. Being "free" from sin (no one is sinless, so I guess "free" here means that we are approaching sinlessnes)
2. Eternally striving for the Good, for self-improvement (less sin). A sort of eternal striving in the godward direction.
Is that correct? And if so, why is belief in Jesus the only way that we can be "saved"
I don't understand why we are saved by faith rather than by our works?