Subduction Zone
Regular Member
So that you can be a better Christian.Why? so I can make the dean's list?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
So that you can be a better Christian.Why? so I can make the dean's list?
You're not God though.I am rather amazed at the arrogance of some Christians that think that they can dictate to their God how he did things.
I believe the real reason dinosaurs went extinct was because Noah did not bring them on the ark.It would help if we had more written history such as...
This day, 1,250,000 BC, Og Thor discovers the health benefits of the green bean.
Oh, I see.No, so you can better understand God's word.
You are dictating to God how he could only have framed His revelation. You are dictating to God that He could only write the first ten chapters of Genesis in Jacobean English, rather than trying to find out what language it was actually written in.You're not God though.
And when I "dictate" to you what God put in writing, I find it interesting you think I'm "dictating to God."
Is there a mindset that you have about yourself that I don't know about?
Isaiah 14:13 For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north:
14 I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High.
Noah didn't bring any animals on the Ark.I believe the real reason dinosaurs went extinct was because Noah did not bring them on the ark.
How do you know what you will find out? You haven't tried. All you can do, as it appears in your post, is to write an inaccurate parody of what others have found out.Oh, I see.
You mean get more education about the Bible, so I'll come to understand that the "ignorant, goat-herding, desert nomads" copied the story of the Flood from the Epic of Gilgamesh?
I don't "dictate to God." I pray to God.You are dictating to God how he could only have framed His revelation.
And right now you are dictating to your God what he did. You are claiming that he was the one that put it all down in writing. You know that you cannot support that claim so all you have is your own rather vain demands of how God act.You're not God though.
And when I "dictate" to you what God put in writing, I find it interesting you think I'm "dictating to God."
Is there a mindset that you have about yourself that I don't know about?
Isaiah 14:13 For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north:
14 I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High.
By reading other peoples' posts.How do you know what you will find out?
And yet you continually refute that claim.I don't "dictate to God." I pray to God.
Okay.And right now you are dictating to your God what he did. You are claiming that he was the one that put it all down in writing. You know that you cannot support that claim so all you have is your own rather vain demands of how God act.
Quotes of a book that you do not appear to understand do not help you. First you need to understand the Bible and when you are trying to tell God how he did everything that is rather difficult to accomplish.
Probably not. Are you done using circular reasoning?Okay.
Are we done going in circles?
BNR32FAN" said:
Paralysis from fear typically only lasts for a very short time and I’m sure if that were the cause of her failing to cry out for help yes she may die but God wouldn’t condemn her so she would’ve still gone to Abraham’s bosom.
That part of John was probably not in the original work. Most Bibles even note that this is probably the case. It seems to have been added over the years.What a couple of pathetic attempts to justify a law that is both both flawed and evil.
First of all while she is not being condemned by God she is is being falsely condemned by men which you seem to conveniently ignore.
Secondly assuming Deuteronomy 22 is making a case for adultery, Jesus in the New Testament has a more compassionate view on how to treat to an adulteress and doesn't carry out the letter of the law.
John 7:53–8:11
Creationists having a literal interpretation of the Bible will defend every verse in the Bible even when it doesn't involve creationism per se.Yeah, I see that. It looks to me as if both you and sjastro got off onto a tangent, circling around the extent to which we attribute "absoluteness" of one sort or another to the nature of the Biblical corpus.
Which points to the fact the Bible is a human construction not a manual issued by God which is to be followed to the letter of the law.That part of John was probably not in the original work. Most Bibles even note that this is probably the case. It seems to have been added over the years.
That's right.Creationists having a literal interpretation of the Bible will defend every verse in the Bible even when it doesn't involve creationism per se.