Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Ok .. Its a bit hard to fight against something that isn't already exerting pressure though(?)Actually humans fight against nature.
I'm pretty sure I don't understand 'creations' there ..Maria Billingsley said:I'm sure you agree non human creations work in a harmonious manner?
That's really not an apples to apples comparison. I could say if the moon crashes into the earth harmony will not exist either. They are both mass extinction events and really not what I'm talking about.I'm pretty sure I don't understand 'creations' there ..
That aside though, I'll try an illustration: Imagine the atmosphere has been filled with toxic gases close to lethality levels. Its not so easy to agree there'd be much 'harmony' left there, for any life forms(?)
Interesting perspective .. thanks!That's really not an apples to apples comparison. I could say if the moon crashes into the earth harmony will not exist either. They are both mass extinction events and really not what I'm talking about.
The point I am trying to make is all but one form of life on earth work in harmony with nature. Humans do not.
But He did, at least this one. And its just us in it until He has dealt with sin and then this universe gets remade and we get access to all the rest of what is in existence that we can not access through or own devices in the time we have.Well, God did create the universe just for us...
Re No 2 - Even if we evolved from apes, there is nothing to suggest Jesus wasn't God made into a man. I'm sure God can transform himself into anything He wants (burning bush anyone?). An ape is just a category of zoological distinction, and we are apes, whether created or evolved, just like any 2 models of car are 'cars' even though they are made by separate companies and not evolved.Hmmm ...
Member since February 2011, with 4026 posts.
Okay then.
But to answer your OP, I believe evolution is blasphemy for two main reasons:
- It teaches we are copy errors, made in the image & likeness of God.
- It teaches we are redeemed by a great ape, who died on the Cross for our sins.
"made in the image and likeness of god" - This is probably more about our mental, emotional and psychological makeup than out physical make up. Our level or consciousness and awareness, our ego etc.Evolution does not approach the topic of redemption, does not seek to diminish the achievements of people by classifying humans as great apes. It is just a classification, it isn't an insult nor is it any indication that humans are any less than they are.
Evolution does not teach that humans are made in the image and likeness of god.
I don't actually even know what that means "made in the image and likeness of god"
If a god doesn't eat, doesn't reproduce, then a god would have no need for teeth, mouth, digestive system, anus, sex organs. If a god doesn't walk then there is no need for arms or legs.
I understand that the Christian belief has Jesus as a man and a god. But before god was on Earth in physical form, why would the god need teeth, mouth, lungs, heart etc???
There isn't any evidence that they don't have them either, the bible is silent on that topic because its not primarily a scientific book. Its the story of God's relationship with man and the story of Jesus principally. Like it says in 1 Corinthians 13:12 - wee see only a dim reflection of reality.Yes, because there's no biblical evidence for animals having souls. And no evidence for animals being our ancestors.
Actually the whole topic of souls is problematic because if souls are needed for a living thing to become living (at least from say a mammal up) then how did that souls get there and when. If animals have souls (i hope they do) then if evolution is true, so did the neanderthals, and all the sub types of humans that existed between our monkey ancestor and us. So if all of them had souls will there be neanderthals in heaven??Why would animals having souls be an implication of evolutionary theory?
Well. more correctly the ecosystem works in harmony, not individual species. Take out the predators of a system and the former prey will reproduce to the point they eat the environment empty and then have mass starvation. They don't get together and say, we have to limit our reproduction or we will run out of food, they strip the landscape. So harmony is imposed on them, not because they work in harmony any more than we do.That's really not an apples to apples comparison. I could say if the moon crashes into the earth harmony will not exist either. They are both mass extinction events and really not what I'm talking about.
The point I am trying to make is all but one form of life on earth work in harmony with nature. Humans do not.
This is consistent with the Theory of Evolution.Genesis clearly states the order of God's creation. Each one keeps within their own designation, type and kind. These are plants, animals/creatures and humans. There is never a crossover and there does not need to be.
So then it doesn't matter what physical form we have? How our physical form evolved is irrelevant to the Christian story?"made in the image and likeness of god" - This is probably more about our mental, emotional and psychological makeup than out physical make up. Our level or consciousness and awareness, our ego etc.
Don't know but i suspect that our physical form contributes a lot to our mental abilities. So dolphins have bigger brains than us and may be smarter but they don't build things because they don't have opposable thumbs and live in water which may make experimentation and learning very difficult.So then it doesn't matter what physical form we have? How our physical form evolved is irrelevant to the Christian story?
I'm not up on Christian beliefs, I understand that Christian is a vast umbrella term and so there are many people within this vast group and these people have differing beliefs.
But, for those Christians that are hell bent on fighting against evolution, what is the root of this resistance?
Shoot it down hard. It's a tool of the devil.It really seems that with their arguments they are just reaching for excuses to shoot down evolution.
My thoughts, which could be wrong because of my poor understanding of Christian beliefs. But here they are:
1. Humans are special (god's children, made in god's image) therefore we can't possibly be animals, or apes. Perhaps these people feel uncomfortable about being part of the animal kingdom.
2. All of existence was made as a playground for humans. If humans evolved randomly then it was just chance that we came to be, and then what would be the purpose for the universe existing if humans weren't destined to be? Perhaps these people feel uncomfortable that a universe wasn't destined to have humans, and without humans at the centre of it would be purposeless and therefore goes against the core belief that god created everything for us.
As I said at the beginning this is really about sin. You may think it's about creation and six days, but that simply comes along with it. God said he created over 6 days. It's the very first thing he said so its the very first thing doubted.Am I on track here? Or are there other reasons?
The ones above seem incredibly self centred.
We are spritual beings, that destroys evolution alone, also God exists and had put that spirit on us, we can get close to God, but people ignore him completely, but he is commanding every man and woman to repent because he pointed a day which he will judge with justice the world, those who believed are going to live forever. But the gospel is crazy stuff for those who are perishing, and those can't understand spiritual things, because you need the spirit of God in you to understand them.
I am trying to work out an approach that could satisfy a Christian religious belief and ToE.Don't know but i suspect that our physical form contributes a lot to our mental abilities. So dolphins have bigger brains than us and may be smarter but they don't build things because they don't have opposable thumbs and live in water which may make experimentation and learning very difficult.
So we couldn't just be blobs of jelly either. Out physical form has to support and enable the mental / psychological etc abilities we posses.
A lot of our physical design is also determined by the bio-mechanic forces of a creature of our size. But do we need to have a coccyx bone to have our mental abilities?, probably not so that may well be a pure evolutionary vestige
Yes, the position you state in the 2nd paragraph is possible, not sure if it makes a difference though.I am trying to work out an approach that could satisfy a Christian religious belief and ToE.
I agree with you that our physical form has a major impact on our mental capacity, our behaviours etc. In fact as an atheist, I don't consider our mental capacity to be anything different from a manifestation of our physiology.
BUT, going with the Christian position (of which I know very little), wouldn't it be possible that the god chooses a species (any species) at a time when it has evolved sufficiently to be able to host such an "image". And so, maybe evolution was directionless, merely adapting to changing environments but not seeking a specific form as a goal, and when the patient and timeless god thought the form was sufficient, then the god "created" the human soul????
I would say its a specific doctrine some hold to - that the Bible was inspired in a way of a dictation, ie every word in it is from God, from the perspective of God and without any possible error.I'm not up on Christian beliefs, I understand that Christian is a vast umbrella term and so there are many people within this vast group and these people have differing beliefs.
But, for those Christians that are hell bent on fighting against evolution, what is the root of this resistance?
It really seems that with their arguments they are just reaching for excuses to shoot down evolution.
My thoughts, which could be wrong because of my poor understanding of Christian beliefs. But here they are:
1. Humans are special (god's children, made in god's image) therefore we can't possibly be animals, or apes. Perhaps these people feel uncomfortable about being part of the animal kingdom.
2. All of existence was made as a playground for humans. If humans evolved randomly then it was just chance that we came to be, and then what would be the purpose for the universe existing if humans weren't destined to be? Perhaps these people feel uncomfortable that a universe wasn't destined to have humans, and without humans at the centre of it would be purposeless and therefore goes against the core belief that god created everything for us.
Am I on track here? Or are there other reasons?
The ones above seem incredibly self centred.
My lack of belief in gods has nothing to do with the Theory of Evolution. It isn't a foundation of my worldview.in fact you all need it desperately because without it you have lost one of the main foundations of your belief in no God.
If I was timeless, then I would persist throughout all time. I would never have to wait, I would merely shift my consciousness (in an instant) to the point in time that I felt was interesting.Now if you want something to happen and you have the means to make it happen you usually go out and actively work to bring it about rather than wait for things
The god might have, but didn't need to.After all, as you say, creating the human soul is an action in itself so why wouldn't God also take the action to tweak an evolutionary process to bring about a physical form that was suitable to what He wanted?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?