• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Do you really care about others or just yourself as a Christian

  • I just care about me and my freedom, ain't wearing no mask

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    9
Status
Not open for further replies.

Angeltp

Active Member
Aug 5, 2020
67
44
Salem
✟26,912.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
That one is a bit complicated as I was from the South. Look up the Free State of Winston.
What about rebellion against bad governments? Let’s say a president or government is ruling in a terrible way which makes the governed to revolt, is that also a sin? Is it a sin to revolt against government when clearly they are not ruling right? Because according to the scripture you used, rebellion against a government is a sin
 
Upvote 0

Angeltp

Active Member
Aug 5, 2020
67
44
Salem
✟26,912.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Drunk drivers don't always know that they're drunk. Someone can be legally drunk and not show symptoms. The point is that there are rules we all follow regardless of symptoms because we have to have some responsibility for how we affect others. The person who prepares your food in a restaurant or in the store you buy it from has to follow certain standards like hand-washing even if they think their hands are clean and they show no symptoms of being sick. You wouldn't hold the person who prepared your food liable if they prepared it after going to the bathroom and not washing their hands? Somehow I can't believe that. That's why public health standards and regulations exist. There needs to be reasonable expectations of how people behave when they are interacting with other people. The blame shouldn't go on the victim of someone else's negligence.


Unless you're living off the grid then you absolutely do "live with these OTHER people". They have certain responsibilities in regards to your safety and you have certain responsibilities in regards to their safety. You can claim your denial of this all you like but it's a fact and it's reality.


I didn't say "government", I said "society". With a society comes benefits AND responsibilities. You're responsible to the society from which you benefit.

I don't know where you're getting 'tyranny' from, nobody brought up tyranny. If you perceive responsibility as tyranny then go live where there is no society, out in the wilderness, off the grid. It's that simple. If you want to participate in society on any level then you must have responsibility towards that society in exchange for the benefits you receive from that society. If all you want is power from the grid, then that's fine, but you have a responsibility to compensate the society that is providing you power by paying that company. If you want to do business with the society and the members of that society then you have to take on the responsibility of living with the people you're doing business with in that society.

But I can tell from your use of the word 'tyranny' that you don't understand the word. There are Christians in this world who live under REAL tyranny, who are persecuted and killed for their faith. Calling mere social responsibility 'tyranny' is an affront to the experience of real Christians around the world.


No, you actually are imposing your ideology on me and everyone in society.


You are telling the society in which you choose to live that they have no right to maintain their public safety and health standards. You could make the same argument about seat belts, that you are not asking anyone to wear a seat belt and that it's 'tyranny' for society to tell you you have to wear a seat belt. Of course, that would be just as wrong. Society (and the government that governs it) does well to defend the rights of its members. That's what wearing seat belts or masks (or shirts or shoes) does for the individuals in a society.

Now, if you really took responsibility for yourself only you would simply leave such a society and go live where you can deal with little or none of these rules and regulations. You can homestead in the wilderness, off the grid, and never have to do anything. But as long as there are people around you in any aspect of your life then you have a responsibility towards them just as they have responsibilities towards you. The whole reason you "own" anything at all in your life is because society makes it happen. Society says that property and land ownership are your right. Society enforces your rights by providing police and courts so that you can protect your ownership rights. If not, then you'd be left to defend your property and with certainty someone bigger and stronger than you would come along and take everything you have. Maybe make you his vassal or serf. What prevents that is society.


That's not a fact, that's a lie. Tyranny is not government. Government is instituted by God. Romans 13 explains it clearly - I don't know if you believe God's Word on this but here's what God says in His Holy Word:
Romans 13
1 Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God.
2 Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation.
3 For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil. Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same:
4 For he is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil.
5 Wherefore ye must needs be subject, not only for wrath, but also for conscience sake.
6 For for this cause pay ye tribute also: for they are God's ministers, attending continually upon this very thing.
7 Render therefore to all their dues: tribute to whom tribute is due; custom to whom custom; fear to whom fear; honour to whom honour.

Now, if you can show me Biblically how earthly government is "tyranny" for enforcing God's justice then please feel free. From what I see, earthly government is not "tyranny" but rather God's ordained ministers unto His Justice and rebellion against them brings damnation upon the rebel.

What about rebellion against bad governments? Let’s say a president or government is ruling in a terrible way which makes the governed to revolt, is that also a sin? Is it a sin to revolt against government when clearly they are not ruling right? Because according to the scripture you used, rebellion against a government is a sin
 
Upvote 0

JackRT

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 17, 2015
15,722
16,445
82
small town Ontario, Canada
✟767,445.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Unorthodox
Marital Status
Married
What about rebellion against bad governments? Let’s say a president or government is ruling in a terrible way which makes the governed to revolt, is that also a sin? Is it a sin to revolt against government when clearly they are not ruling right? Because according to the scripture you used, rebellion against a government is a sin

The American colonists revolted against a government that they considered to be tyrannical. That is a very questionable point of view especially considering what has happened since.
 
Upvote 0

TexFire316

Come as a child, with no agenda
Jan 31, 2017
312
258
69
Conroe, Texas
Visit site
✟44,706.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Bull, I hate the left. I am more conservative than you'll ever hope to be. If you would be smart and read I quoted an article.
That's hurtful, I have very big hopes I have you know. :clap:
Sorry, my first impressions have been known to be wrong before.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RushMAN
Upvote 0

Nithavela

you're in charge you can do it just get louis
Apr 14, 2007
30,572
22,237
Comb. Pizza Hut and Taco Bell/Jamaica Avenue.
✟586,268.00
Country
Germany
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Single
The consequences won't make me believe im wrong nor selfish. The whole world is wrong and selfish and or stupid to give up there freedoms. Land of the free, HOME OF THE BRAVE? What a joke.



Yea, they can refuse service. Its wrong, but sure. But some businesses won't refuse service. Heck, some businesses can refuse service if you DO WEAR A MASK. As a counter culture response. Cudos to them.

And I thought you agreed with me that I'm not responsible? Now your saying I am?



No, thats not how to solve it. The way to solve it is governments leave the businesses alone and the businesses decide there own policy on masks. That, or civil war.
I'll take civil war, please!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: cow451
Upvote 0

Nithavela

you're in charge you can do it just get louis
Apr 14, 2007
30,572
22,237
Comb. Pizza Hut and Taco Bell/Jamaica Avenue.
✟586,268.00
Country
Germany
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Single
Upvote 0

Pommer

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic
Sep 13, 2008
22,344
13,799
Earth
✟239,491.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
No, thats not how to solve it. The way to solve it is governments leave the businesses alone and the businesses decide there own policy on masks. That, or civil war.
Civil war over mask-wearing requirements to get through a pandemic?

What’s next, an insurrection to protest speed-traps?
 
Upvote 0

Nithavela

you're in charge you can do it just get louis
Apr 14, 2007
30,572
22,237
Comb. Pizza Hut and Taco Bell/Jamaica Avenue.
✟586,268.00
Country
Germany
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Single
Civil war over mask-wearing requirements to get through a pandemic?

What’s next, an insurrection to protest speed-traps?
One can only hope. A truly free society is one where everyone kills anyone over anything.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: KCfromNC
Upvote 0

jollybear

Newbie
Nov 22, 2007
92
17
45
✟20,368.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
It appears then.... that you have no concern about how many people you may infect while being a carrier during your incubation period. Nice.

I'm MORE concerned about everyone's freedom. If someone else is afraid and more concerned about the virus than they can wear the masks that supposedly protects them.

I don't see why they should get to choose that any more than they get to choose whether their employees wash their hands after going to the bathroom.

They should get to choose that too.

Yeah, uh huh. Sure.

Ya mess with peoples freedoms then you ask for a backfire. Aspeasally from certain types of people. You dont deserve freedom unless your willing to fight for it. Don't depend upon your veterans.
 
Upvote 0

JackRT

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 17, 2015
15,722
16,445
82
small town Ontario, Canada
✟767,445.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Unorthodox
Marital Status
Married
I'm MORE concerned about everyone's freedom.

Visit the Freedom Café. For those of you who choose not to wear masks, please visit the Freedom Cafe! We trust you to make your own choices if you want to wear a face mask. And, in the same spirit of individual liberty, we allow our staff to make their own choices about the safety procedures they prefer to follow as they prepare and serve your food. We encourage employees to wash their hands after using the bathroom, but understand that some people may be allergic to certain soaps or may simply prefer not to wash their hands. It is not our place to tell them what to do. We understand that you may be used to chicken that has been cooked to 165 degrees. We do have to respect that some of our cooks may have seen a meme or a YouTube video saying that 100 degrees is sufficient, and we do not want to encroach on their beliefs." Some of our cooks may prefer to use the same utensils for multiple ingredients, including ingredients some customers are allergic to. That is a cook’s right to do so. Some servers may wish to touch your food as they serve it. There is no reason that a healthy person with clean hands can’t touch your food. We will take their word for it that they are healthy and clean. Water temperature and detergent are highly personal choices, and we allow our dishwashing team to decide how they’d prefer to wash the silverware you will put in your mouth. Some of you may get sick, but almost everyone survives food poisoning. We think you’ll agree that it’s a small price to pay for the sweet freedom of no one ever being told what to do - and especially not for the silly reason of keeping strangers healthy.
 
Upvote 0

KCfromNC

Regular Member
Apr 18, 2007
30,256
17,181
✟545,630.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
I'm MORE concerned about everyone's freedom.

Freedom to do what, exactly? I mean, freedom as an abstract thing sounds great. But applying that abstract idea is what make an idea useful in a practical sense.

So are we talking about the freedom to worship a religion without government interference here, or the freedom to eat babies? Details like that make a difference.
 
Upvote 0

jollybear

Newbie
Nov 22, 2007
92
17
45
✟20,368.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
Drunk drivers don't always know that they're drunk.

If your head is in a buzz and your wably, dizzy, then you KNOW your drunk.

Someone can be legally drunk and not show symptoms.

I dont care about legal i care about reality and common sense.

The point is that there are rules we all follow regardless of symptoms because we have to have some responsibility for how we affect others. The person who prepares your food in a restaurant or in the store you buy it from has to follow certain standards like hand-washing even if they think their hands are clean and they show no symptoms of being sick. You wouldn't hold the person who prepared your food liable if they prepared it after going to the bathroom and not washing their hands? Somehow I can't believe that.

Well I dont care if you dont believe it and if you dont believe it then our discussion is going to be pointless. If they peed on there hand, I'd expect them to wash it. And I think they naturally would. If they don't always wash there hands I trust they know there hands are clean enough. There not our children.

That's why public health standards and regulations exist. There needs to be reasonable expectations of how people behave when they are interacting with other people. The blame shouldn't go on the victim of someone else's negligence.

Lets stay in context, MASKS. I'm not responsible for your health, if you dont wanna take the risk to get sick, then YOU wear the mask. You take responsibility yourself.

Unless you're living off the grid then you absolutely do "live with these OTHER people". They have certain responsibilities in regards to your safety and you have certain responsibilities in regards to their safety. You can claim your denial of this all you like but it's a fact and it's reality.

No its not a fact or a reality. SOMETIMES its a fact and SOMETIMES its not. In the case of masks its NOT.

I didn't say "government", I said "society". With a society comes benefits AND responsibilities. You're responsible to the society from which you benefit.

Depends on what kind of responsibility your talking about. Stuff like dont steel, dont murder, dont rape, dont break contracts, ABSOLUTELY im responsible. But masks?NOPE im not responsible for your health. You are.

I don't know where you're getting 'tyranny' from, nobody brought up tyranny.

You dont have to bring up the word for it to be obviously applied.


If you perceive responsibility as tyranny then go live where there is no society, out in the wilderness, off the grid. It's that simple.

No its not that simple. I'm responsible in SOME ways to society, not ALL ways.

If you want to participate in society on any level then you must have responsibility towards that society in exchange for the benefits you receive from that society.

When I go to a store, my responsibility is to PAY for the food with MONEY I earned by work. I'm not responsible for YOUR health. Period. I dont know where you people get off on thinking otherwise.

If all you want is power from the grid, then that's fine, but you have a responsibility to compensate the society that is providing you power by paying that company.

Why are you going off on these irrelevant red herrings about paying the power company?

Come on man, I'm not responsible for your health. You wear the mask.

If you want to do business with the society and the members of that society then you have to take on the responsibility of living with the people you're doing business with in that society.

Yea, I pay money i earned via work for products or services. Im not responsible for your health, YOU ARE. Its not me that needs to go live off grid, its you that needs to go live in a country that seeks authoritarian conquest.

But I can tell from your use of the word 'tyranny' that you don't understand the word. There are Christians in this world who live under REAL tyranny, who are persecuted and killed for their faith. Calling mere social responsibility 'tyranny' is an affront to the experience of real Christians around the world.

Yea, those Christians undergo tyranny as well. Tyranny comes in different intensities. Demanding i be responsible for your health is still tyranny. Period.

No, you actually are imposing your ideology on me and everyone in society.

No im not, you can go wear your mask or live in your fearfull bubble, but i won't join you. Your imposing YOUR idea on me because your TELLING ME that I must join you. Well, NO!

You are telling the society in which you choose to live that they have no right to maintain their public safety and health standards.

Lets get this straight. I'm not living with THEM. There not living with ME. Wer living ON THE SAME PLANET. That means im not in THERE house, there not in MY house. I'm not responsible for THERE health, THEY ARE.

You could make the same argument about seat belts, that you are not asking anyone to wear a seat belt and that it's 'tyranny' for society to tell you you have to wear a seat belt.

And yes, its ALSO tyranny for society to tell anyone to wear a seatbelt. Its ok to RECOMMEND, but ORDER this when it SHOULD be a personal choice? No, thats wrong.

Of course, that would be just as wrong. Society (and the government that governs it) does well to defend the rights of its members. That's what wearing seat belts or masks (or shirts or shoes) does for the individuals in a society.

Oh so requiring me to wear a seatbelt protects YOUR rights? Requiring me to wear a mask, protects your rights? Requiring me to wear shoes protects your rights? What kind of upside down thinking is that? No, that does not protect your rights, that imposes your tyranny upon others rights to choose there own way. The sheer audacity. Why can't people mind there own business.

if you really took responsibility for yourself only you would simply leave such a society and go live where you can deal with little or none of these rules and regulations. You can homestead in the wilderness, off the grid, and never have to do anything. But as long as there are people around you in any aspect of your life then you have a responsibility towards them just as they have responsibilities towards you.

Again, it depends on what kind of responsibility wer talking about. Rape, murder, theft, breaking contracts, that kind of responsibility, YES, but your health? NO. You wear the mask.

The whole reason you "own" anything at all in your life is because society makes it happen.

What is wrong with you? Your talking about stuff that is totally unrelated to anything im talking about. And your talking about stuff I already agree with. Of course, someone built trucks and cars and houses and invented and innovated them and we work, and some of our work plays a role in helping to make those things and then we pay money to buy those things. Of course. But, im not responsible for your health, you wear the mask. Whats so hard about that?

Society says that property and land ownership are your right.

So if society decided that its no longer my right, would society be right then? NO it would not.

Society enforces your rights by providing police and courts so that you can protect your ownership rights. If not, then you'd be left to defend your property and with certainty someone bigger and stronger than you would come along and take everything you have. Maybe make you his vassal or serf. What prevents that is society.

[STAFF EDITED]

That's not a fact, that's a lie. Tyranny is not government. Government is instituted by God. Romans 13 explains it clearly - I don't know if you believe God's Word on this but here's what God says in His Holy Word:
Romans 13
1 Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God.
2 Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation.
3 For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil. Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same:
4 For he is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil.
5 Wherefore ye must needs be subject, not only for wrath, but also for conscience sake.
6 For for this cause pay ye tribute also: for they are God's ministers, attending continually upon this very thing.
7 Render therefore to all their dues: tribute to whom tribute is due; custom to whom custom; fear to whom fear; honour to whom honour.

Now, if you can show me Biblically how earthly government is "tyranny" for enforcing God's justice then please feel free. From what I see, earthly government is not "tyranny" but rather God's ordained ministers unto His Justice and rebellion against them brings damnation upon the rebel.

I didnt say OR mean that ALL FORMS of government are tyranny. But holding me responsible for your health IS tyranny.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0

Mayzoo

Well-Known Member
Jun 17, 2004
4,261
1,649
✟250,701.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Visit the Freedom Café. For those of you who choose not to wear masks, please visit the Freedom Cafe! We trust you to make your own choices if you want to wear a face mask. And, in the same spirit of individual liberty, we allow our staff to make their own choices about the safety procedures they prefer to follow as they prepare and serve your food. We encourage employees to wash their hands after using the bathroom, but understand that some people may be allergic to certain soaps or may simply prefer not to wash their hands. It is not our place to tell them what to do. We understand that you may be used to chicken that has been cooked to 165 degrees. We do have to respect that some of our cooks may have seen a meme or a YouTube video saying that 100 degrees is sufficient, and we do not want to encroach on their beliefs." Some of our cooks may prefer to use the same utensils for multiple ingredients, including ingredients some customers are allergic to. That is a cook’s right to do so. Some servers may wish to touch your food as they serve it. There is no reason that a healthy person with clean hands can’t touch your food. We will take their word for it that they are healthy and clean. Water temperature and detergent are highly personal choices, and we allow our dishwashing team to decide how they’d prefer to wash the silverware you will put in your mouth. Some of you may get sick, but almost everyone survives food poisoning. We think you’ll agree that it’s a small price to pay for the sweet freedom of no one ever being told what to do - and especially not for the silly reason of keeping strangers healthy.

Spitting into your food as they prepare it, inserting ingredients that the cooks feel should be in it (edible or not), and everyone is allowed to drive home drunk after we watch them imbibe way too much (because heck, our staff maybe too drunk to tell if you are drunk)....freedom at all costs.

After all, death, dismemberment, and long term disability come with tons of freedom does it not?
 
Upvote 0

ArmenianJohn

Politically Liberal Christian Fundamentalist
Jan 30, 2013
8,962
5,551
New Jersey (NYC Metro)
✟205,252.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
What about rebellion against bad governments? Let’s say a president or government is ruling in a terrible way which makes the governed to revolt, is that also a sin? Is it a sin to revolt against government when clearly they are not ruling right? Because according to the scripture you used, rebellion against a government is a sin
The only exception we see in God's Word for not submitting to earthly government is if it would cause you to sin directly against God. So, a government that taxes you "too much" or otherwise does things we may not like is not causing us to sin directly against God with those things. But a government that tries to force me to worship an idol or to harm other people by enslaving or killing them, I am not bound to obey those laws because we ought to obey God rather than men.

For example - if I lived in Nazi Germany, if I were helping a Jew to avoid being captured and killed, I would be breaking the law BUT it would be to serve God and do His Will. However, if I went to the store and stole a watch and then the Nazi government caught me, I have no excuse, I am bound to the laws and justice of that government.

Look at Daniel who obeyed Nebuchadnezzar right up until he was asked to sin against God. Look at the Apostles like Peter and Paul and John who were martyred, they obeyed the government at all times right up until they were ordered to stop evangelizing and they disobeyed in that because it would have caused them to sin, so they were martyred for it. But this is the same St. Paul the Apostle who was in jail during an earthquake and could have escaped BUT he remained subject to the authorities and stayed in jail, so as to obey the government and thereby obey God.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Angeltp
Upvote 0

Angeltp

Active Member
Aug 5, 2020
67
44
Salem
✟26,912.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The only exception we see in God's Word for not submitting to earthly government is if it would cause you to sin directly against God. So, a government that taxes you "too much" or otherwise does things we may not like is not causing us to sin directly against God with those things. But a government that tries to force me to worship an idol or to harm other people by enslaving or killing them, I am not bound to obey those laws because we ought to obey God rather than men.

For example - if I lived in Nazi Germany, if I were helping a Jew to avoid being captured and killed, I would be breaking the law BUT it would be to serve God and do His Will. However, if I went to the store and stole a watch and then the Nazi government caught me, I have no excuse, I am bound to the laws and justice of that government.

Look at Daniel who obeyed Nebuchadnezzar right up until he was asked to sin against God. Look at the Apostles like Peter and Paul and John who were martyred, they obeyed the government at all times right up until they were ordered to stop evangelizing and they disobeyed in that because it would have caused them to sin, so they were martyred for it. But this is the same St. Paul the Apostle who was in jail during an earthquake and could have escaped BUT he remained subject to the authorities and stayed in jail, so as to obey the government and thereby obey God.
Thanks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ArmenianJohn
Upvote 0

JackRT

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 17, 2015
15,722
16,445
82
small town Ontario, Canada
✟767,445.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Unorthodox
Marital Status
Married
Lets stay in context, MASKS. I'm not responsible for your health, if you dont wanna take the risk to get sick, then YOU wear the mask.

Yes, you are! The charge is reckless endangerment. You can have and transmit the virus even when displaying no symptoms. Masks are far more effective at preventing you from infecting someone else than they are in preventing you from being infected by someone else. Or as a Christian might put it "Yes, I am brother's keeper."
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.