• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Why an eternal hell?

Status
Not open for further replies.

J0hnSm1th

Regular Member
Jan 12, 2006
481
48
Australia
✟2,166.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
since people sin against an INFINITELY worthy and holy and good God, the punishment one must receive would be that of equal value, which would be an infinite punishment. Even with your earthly thinking, your logic must end up concluding the existence of an eternal hell regardless. How much more would we have to conclude an eternal hell if we realize His ways are not our ways?
If punishment in hell was eternal then that would make god a monster. I cannot equate that doctrine with the God i know. If eternal torment did exist then what kind of God would bring a sentient being into existence with the foreknowledge that they would end up burning forever?

I agree that hell exists in some form and that the unregenerate go there for judgement and punishment. Put that punishment is for a finite period after which comes oblivion.
 
Upvote 0

Armistead14

Newbie
Mar 18, 2006
1,430
61
✟24,449.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
if grace abounded much more everyone would be saved including the wicked. Grace doesn't about that much. We are still commanded to repent over a hundred times in the Bible. Grace abounds only for those of faith. Even still we are commanded to repent.

Not sure what you're saying, but we must connect the verses of Romans 5. The chapter explains because of the sins of one man, Adam, all men were thrown into sin and death was the penalty. Simply Adam's sin condemned us all to death { and eternal torture, although that's not mentioned}


Then it explains that even as Adam plunged us all to death {and eternal torture} that in Christ all are made alive. Simply, what Adam did, Christ corrected with life. However, it seems that since most will go to eternal torture, Christ didn't correct what Adam did. If Adam sent us all to hell and Christ can only save a few, how can grace abound more than the sin of Adam? You say grace didn't abound that much, well, if most of mankind is in hell, I would agree with you.

Now one can say grace abounded more, we just don't accept it, but that still doesn't solve the problem that Adam's sin condemned more that Christ could save.

Course the bible says Adam sentenced us to death, so to pay for our sins Christ had to die. If the sentence for our sins is eternal torture, then for Christ to make equal payment, he would have to be eternally tortured.

Your statement that grace abounds more for only people of faith makes no sense at all regarding what is being taught in this chapter.
 
Upvote 0

createdtoworship

In the grip of grace
Mar 13, 2004
18,941
1,758
West Coast USA
✟48,173.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Not sure what you're saying, but we must connect the verses of Romans 5. The chapter explains because of the sins of one man, Adam, all men were thrown into sin and death was the penalty. Simply Adam's sin condemned us all to death { and eternal torture, although that's not mentioned}


Then it explains that even as Adam plunged us all to death {and eternal torture} that in Christ all are made alive. Simply, what Adam did, Christ corrected with life. However, it seems that since most will go to eternal torture, Christ didn't correct what Adam did. If Adam sent us all to hell and Christ can only save a few, how can grace abound more than the sin of Adam? You say grace didn't abound that much, well, if most of mankind is in hell, I would agree with you.

Now one can say grace abounded more, we just don't accept it, but that still doesn't solve the problem that Adam's sin condemned more that Christ could save.

Course the bible says Adam sentenced us to death, so to pay for our sins Christ had to die. If the sentence for our sins is eternal torture, then for Christ to make equal payment, he would have to be eternally tortured.

Your statement that grace abounds more for only people of faith makes no sense at all regarding what is being taught in this chapter.

"Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat: Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it."

matthew 7:13-14

so according to that verse there will be few in heaven.
 
Upvote 0

createdtoworship

In the grip of grace
Mar 13, 2004
18,941
1,758
West Coast USA
✟48,173.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
If punishment in hell was eternal then that would make god a monster. I cannot equate that doctrine with the God i know. If eternal torment did exist then what kind of God would bring a sentient being into existence with the foreknowledge that they would end up burning forever?

I agree that hell exists in some form and that the unregenerate go there for judgement and punishment. Put that punishment is for a finite period after which comes oblivion.

I guess drowning an entire race of individuals in a global flood is out of the question too? Or death by fire in the end of the world?
 
Upvote 0

seeingeyes

Newbie
Nov 29, 2011
8,944
809
Backwoods, Ohio
✟35,360.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
If punishment in hell was eternal then that would make god a monster. I cannot equate that doctrine with the God i know. If eternal torment did exist then what kind of God would bring a sentient being into existence with the foreknowledge that they would end up burning forever?

I agree that hell exists in some form and that the unregenerate go there for judgement and punishment. Put that punishment is for a finite period after which comes oblivion.

I guess drowning an entire race of individuals in a global flood is out of the question too? Or death by fire in the end of the world?

The two are not equivalent.

If they were, wouldn't you consider Annihilation an equally valid view?
 
Upvote 0

Metal Minister

New Year, Still Old School!
May 8, 2012
12,142
591
✟37,499.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
J0hnSm1th said:
If punishment in hell was eternal then that would make god a monster. I cannot equate that doctrine with the God i know. If eternal torment did exist then what kind of God would bring a sentient being into existence with the foreknowledge that they would end up burning forever?

I agree that hell exists in some form and that the unregenerate go there for judgement and punishment. Put that punishment is for a finite period after which comes oblivion.
In case you didn't see my post of a blog by the same name:
Metal Minister said:
An excerpt from a blog entitled "Is God A Monster".

Nearly fifty years ago, the British agnostic Bertrand Russell penned these words: "There is one very serious defect to my mind in Christ's moral character, and that is that He believed in hell. I do not myself feel that any person who is really profoundly humane can believe in everlasting punishment" (Bertrand Russell, Why I Am Not a Christian).

Philosopher John Hick echoed those sentiments when he called hell "a perversion of the Christian gospel." He believed the doctrine of hell attributed to God "an unappeasable vindictiveness and insatiable cruelty."

We expect statements like that from fallen, unregenerate minds. But what do we do when we hear similar things from prominent, professing evangelical writers? "How can Christians possibly project a deity of such cruelty and vindictiveness whose ways include inflicting everlasting torture upon his creatures, however sinful they may have been? Surely a God who would do such a thing is more nearly like Satan than like God..." (Clark H. Pinnock, "The Destruction of the Finally Impenitent").

It's become popular today for professing evangelicals to join the ranks of Pinnock, atheists, and agnostics in protesting the doctrine of hell. They are preaching sermons, writing articles, and publishing books, and some are wandering into the comment threads of Christian blogs. Here's a small sampling from Grace To You's blog in our recent series on hell:

"What kind of God torments people for all eternity?" "...Satan loves the false doctrine of eternal torment" "[eternal torment is] cruel and unusual punishment" "[eternal torment] makes God out to be a cruel tyrant," "absolutely cruel and malevolent" "How can you in your right minds even consider this to be justice?"

If the doctrine of hell as eternal, conscious torment hadn't been the position of the Christian church for two millennia, it might be easy to think we're seriously out of step--a bunch of mindless minions who worship a monster-god! But when you examine the biblical evidence, without an agenda, you'll find we sound a lot like Jesus and the apostles.

So, how could someone who claims to be faithful to Scripture ridicule the idea of eternal punishment? What is at the heart of their rejection of a never-ending hell? It's simple, really--they minimize the seriousness of human sin and guilt, and they distort the perfection of divine justice. That's the crime of Protestant Liberalism and every false religion.

Minimizing the Sinfulness of Sin

To one degree or another, we're all guilty of minimizing sin. I remember the first time I read the account of Lot's wife. God turned her into a pillar of salt as she was leaving Sodom. Her crime? A backward glance (Gen. 19:26). Reading that story as an unbeliever provoked me to ask the question: "Was that really an offense worthy of death--turning your neck to take one final look at your home?" As I explored more of the Bible, other accounts of God's judgment appeared equally capricious and severe to me.

Nadab and Abihu deviated from the priestly procedures. God consumed them with fire (Lev. 10:1-2). One man gathered wood on the Sabbath. God commanded Moses to stone him (Num. 15:35). Achan took a few forbidden items from the spoils of Jericho. God commanded Joshua to stone and then burn Achan along with his entire family (Josh. 7:24-25). Uzzah kept the ark of God from falling into the mud by reaching out his hand and taking hold of it. God immediately struck him dead (2 Sam. 6:6-7). Ananias and Sapphira lied to the apostles. God killed them both in front of the entire church. (Acts 5:1-10).

We often struggle to understand how something seemingly so trivial could enact such a severe judgment. Our flesh wants to cry out in protest, "That's not fair!" But responses like that reveal our failure to grasp the depth of sin. We see only actions--a devoted father gathering firewood to keep his family warm; a zealous Israelite anxious to keep the Ark of God off the ground--but God sees things differently, more clearly, than we do. He sees our sin as insurrection, rebellion against His holiness (Ex. 31:14; Num. 4:15). What's more, He sees the hidden motives and intentions at the core of our actions (Mt. 5:28; Heb. 4:12).

One of the most basic tenets of justice is that the punishment must fit the crime. So, if the ultimate punishment for those who die without Christ is hell, then what is the crime? What do men do to merit the eternal sentence of hell? Put plainly, they sin.

You can read the rest here:

http://www.gty.org/blog/B110518

May God Richly Bless you!

May God Richly Bless you!
 
Upvote 0

createdtoworship

In the grip of grace
Mar 13, 2004
18,941
1,758
West Coast USA
✟48,173.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
The two are not equivalent.

If they were, wouldn't you consider Annihilation an equally valid view?

annihilation isn't death by suffocation, or death by third degree burning. Annihilation can be preceeded by heart attack, stroke or any one of relatively minor diseases that may or may not have any suffering/pain at all. Drowning is a tactic used in torture (waterboarding).

So we may say that the torture of hell is equivelent to the torture of drowning, or the torture of burning with fire (iin the end days fire will reign from heaven)

if you do away with one, you have to reanalyze all of scripture.
 
Upvote 0

seeingeyes

Newbie
Nov 29, 2011
8,944
809
Backwoods, Ohio
✟35,360.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
annihilation isn't death by suffocation, or death by third degree burning. Annihilation can be preceeded by heart attack, stroke or any one of relatively minor diseases that may or may not have any suffering/pain at all. Drowning is a tactic used in torture (waterboarding).

So we may say that the torture of hell is equivelent to the torture of drowning, or the torture of burning with fire (iin the end days fire will reign from heaven)

if you do away with one, you have to reanalyze all of scripture.

So torture for a few minutes is the same as torture for a week? Or a year? Or an eternity?
 
Upvote 0
B

Blessedj01

Guest
Oops! Then I'd need to call you a bloke in my Aussie slang lingo.

However, immigrants who come to Australia sure find some of our slang difficult to get to know and use. However, it's part of our culture.

What are the slang terms unique to NZ?

Oz

I'd be fine to call me a bloke, but I don't know if that term's appropriate for God.

"Shiela" is slang for a female in NZ as well, but nobody really says it.
 
Upvote 0

createdtoworship

In the grip of grace
Mar 13, 2004
18,941
1,758
West Coast USA
✟48,173.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
So torture for a few minutes is the same as torture for a week? Or a year? Or an eternity?

still torture, I mean what kind of person tortures for weeks, can also torture for eternity. It is the same personality type. So I guess you have to throw the whole Bible out.
 
Upvote 0
B

Blessedj01

Guest
And still God is taking away all hope for the lost.

God doesn't take away their hope, they simply have none. If you have no hope in God now what makes you think you'll develop some after you die?

After all, He could have saved everyone if He chose to. He didn't.

No he couldn't. That would require forcing you to accept Him, which would make you little more than a robot.
 
Upvote 0

dollarsbill

Well-Known Member
Jan 17, 2012
6,676
147
✟7,746.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
God doesn't take away their hope, they simply have none. If you have no hope in God now what makes you think you'll develop some after you die?
1 Samuel 2:6 (NASB)
6 "The LORD kills and makes alive;
No he couldn't. That would require forcing you to accept Him, which would make you little more than a robot.
God didn't create everyone exactly as He chose to do?
 
Upvote 0

seeingeyes

Newbie
Nov 29, 2011
8,944
809
Backwoods, Ohio
✟35,360.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
still torture, I mean what kind of person tortures for weeks, can also torture for eternity. It is the same personality type. So I guess you have to throw the whole Bible out.

It is? So someone who holds your head underwater and drowns you is the same as someone who holds your head under till you are almost dead, then pulls you out, then dunks you again, then pulls you out, then dunks you again, then pulls you out, etc. for three weeks?
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.