• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Who's on First?

Which exists first?

  • Life

  • Non-life


Results are only viewable after voting.

tansy

Senior Member
Jan 12, 2008
7,027
1,331
✟50,979.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Too true -- and when you consider that evolution only explains a species' physical development, and God (so I've heard) is a more "spiritually" minded Supreme Being, does it really matter what we physically developed into, so long as we are able to commune (however it happens) with the divine?

How much less "in God's Image" would we be if we had evolved into two-headed firebreathing chickens?

Well, I'm jolly glad I'm not a two-headed fire-breathing chicken LOL.

You may have a point Nathan..though I tend to think that God planned how we would be,,inclcuding animals and plants, but I do know at least one other Christian who shares your view.
 
Upvote 0

Nathan Poe

Well-Known Member
Sep 21, 2002
32,198
1,693
51
United States
✟41,319.00
Faith
Agnostic
Politics
US-Democrat
Well, I'm jolly glad I'm not a two-headed fire-breathing chicken LOL.

Ah, but if you were a two-headed firebreathing chicken, you'd probably be jolly glad you weren't a one-headed hairless ape.

It was the greek philosopher Xenophanes who rejected an anthropomorphic god -- "But if cattle and horses or lions had hands, or were able to draw with their hands and do the work that men can do, horses would draw the forms of the gods like horses, and cattle like cattle, and they would make their bodies such as they each had themselves."

You may have a point Nathan..though I tend to think that God planned how we would be,,inclcuding animals and plants, but I do know at least one other Christian who shares your view.

Humans are obsessed with superficial physical things -- why assume that God is too?
 
Upvote 0

tansy

Senior Member
Jan 12, 2008
7,027
1,331
✟50,979.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Ah, but if you were a two-headed firebreathing chicken, you'd probably be jolly glad you weren't a one-headed hairless ape.

It was the greek philosopher Xenophanes who rejected an anthropomorphic god -- "But if cattle and horses or lions had hands, or were able to draw with their hands and do the work that men can do, horses would draw the forms of the gods like horses, and cattle like cattle, and they would make their bodies such as they each had themselves."



Humans are obsessed with superficial physical things -- why assume that God is too?

As I say, you may have a point..it's just kinda hard to imagine NOT being as I am - and I have to say i do sometimes say to God things like wouldnt it have been useful if you'd given us pouches like knagaroos to carry things in (with zips of course!), so we don't have to carry bags and we don't lose our wallets etc..LOL
 
Upvote 0

Hespera

Junior Member
Dec 16, 2008
7,237
201
usa
✟8,860.00
Faith
Buddhist
Marital Status
Private
As I say, you may have a point..it's just kinda hard to imagine NOT being as I am - and I have to say i do sometimes say to God things like wouldnt it have been useful if you'd given us pouches like knagaroos to carry things in (with zips of course!), so we don't have to carry bags and we don't lose our wallets etc..LOL

Shucks, while he was at it, a few other design changes! Here we have big powerful hind legs that are so badly engineered we can be outrun by a chicken. Tweak this, lengthen these bones, move that muscle attachment a bit and voila! We can race kangaroos. Imagine the savings in gas.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,435
52,724
Guam
✟5,182,747.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
The poll results seem pretty scientific to me. I.e., about 12 per cent of people will pretty much believe anything.

I wonder if such folks believed walking existed before legs or leg-like appendages?

Or carts existed before horses?

LOL.
Doesn't pantheism teach the Gaea Hypothesis, or is it up to the individual?
 
Upvote 0

tansy

Senior Member
Jan 12, 2008
7,027
1,331
✟50,979.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Shucks, while he was at it, a few other design changes! Here we have big powerful hind legs that are so badly engineered we can be outrun by a chicken. Tweak this, lengthen these bones, move that muscle attachment a bit and voila! We can race kangaroos. Imagine the savings in gas.

Of course, thenagain He's given us the brains to build fast vehicles, make flying machines, constuct spacecraft, build ships, hovercrafts etc etc...so maybe we're not so badly off, after all :D
 
Upvote 0