Who Would You Like to See Posting Here Again?

[AV1611VET]

Could have been a Poe though....

That's true.

But his posting style is very similar to Nathan's, which I observed before I went private and asked him if he was Nathan.

Same profile too.

 

[Landon Caeli]

Could have been a Poe though....

I hope that if he reads this, he PM's me, because I'm totally curious.

...I promise I won't tell.

 

[AV1611VET]

I hope that if he reads this, he PM's me, because I'm totally curious.

...I promise I won't tell.

I told him I wouldn't tell either.

 

[TLK Valentine]

I miss some of our more... "unhinged" posters around here... I won't name names, but this place needs some entertainment

 

[TLK Valentine]

I hope that if he reads this, he PM's me, because I'm totally curious.

...I promise I won't tell.

Nathan Poe was actually the reason I came here -- I had heard about how "Poe's Law" became a meme...

But he was gone by the time I got here. Someone said he was permabanned. If he had a new account, wouldn't that one get banned too?

 

[AV1611VET]

Nathan Poe was actually the reason I came here -- I had heard about how "Poe's Law" became a meme...

But he was gone by the time I got here. Someone said he was permabanned. If he had a new account, wouldn't that one get banned too?

I thought you told me you were Nathan Poe???

ETA: Dear me! I apologize! My mistake!

Are you Nathan Poe?

Yes I'm Nathan Poe--an academic who studies the intersection of comedy and religious credulity.

 

[TLK Valentine]

I thought you told me you were Nathan Poe???

ETA: Dear me! I apologize! My mistake!

That's quite alright, but let's quash that rumor.

Comparing me to Nathan Poe should probably count as a flame... but I'm not sure to whom...

 

[AV1611VET]

That's quite alright, but let's quash that rumor.

Comparing me to Nathan Poe should probably count as a flame... but I'm not sure to whom...

Both Nathan and I have threads started in our honor:

NATHAN POE

AV1611VET

 

[Gottservant]

The thing is, whatever angle you try, to show that safety in numbers applies to Evolution for example, you are told "no, numbers don't evolve" and expected to start again.

When it comes to the faith, you feed your faith with wise words and true sayings, Evolutionists don't do this - it makes the conversation very one-sided?

 

[Shemjaza]

The thing is, whatever angle you try, to show that safety in numbers applies to Evolution for example, you are told "no, numbers don't evolve" and expected to start again.

When it comes to the faith, you feed your faith with wise words and true sayings, Evolutionists don't do this - it makes the conversation very one-sided?

That doesn't make sense. Only you are saying that.

 

[TLK Valentine]

That doesn't make sense. Only you are saying that.

Please be advised that in another thread -- and this is an established fact, not intended as a flame or insult -- Gottservant has self-identified as a diagnosed schizophrenic.

 

[AV1611VET]

Matt Mariott