• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Who Was Moses Talking To??

JAL

Veteran
Site Supporter
Oct 16, 2004
10,778
928
Visit site
✟343,550.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I sort of agree.
"His face was shining brighter than the sun" (Rev 1). A full exposure to the divine Light would be a full revelation of the divine Holiness (His majesty, purity, power, and love). This would be too terrifying AND too sin-convicting for our biological heart to survive the emotional shock; we'd die of a heart attack. God therefore has to initiate us at low radiance and then gradually increase the radiance - this is called sanctification. So we can EVENTUALLY be exposed to the full radiance without dying - well at least in theory, but the problem is that the human lifespan is too short for this gradual process to complete. Hence "No one (in this life) can see my face (in the fullness of its radiance) and live."

Many biblical saints saw God face to face but it wasn't the full radiance, it was a shaded view.

But Moses was asking for the full radiance in that passage. He wasn't asking for a shaded view. And he got it - well, sort of. Here's the thing. The brightest part of the divine form is HIS FACE. His BACK isn't quite as bright. God knew that Moses couldn't withstand His face but he was mature enough to withstand the fullness of God's back.

And that, my friends, is astonishing. Moses was so incredibly advanced that he could withstand the fullness of Gods back - a revelation that would have instantly killed any ordinary man. Who knows? Had Moses lived just a little longer, and kept maturing spiritually, perhaps he soon would have been able to withstand God's face.
 
Upvote 0

JohnRabbit

just trying to understand
Site Supporter
Feb 12, 2009
4,383
320
i am in alabama
✟100,288.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single



i have seen no scripture that supports what you say, so what you have written is pure conjecture!
 
Upvote 0

JAL

Veteran
Site Supporter
Oct 16, 2004
10,778
928
Visit site
✟343,550.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
i have seen no scripture that supports what you say, so what you have written is pure conjecture!
Ok I cited the Scripture that says His face shone like the sun.

And as for the shading part, it's pretty clear in the passage, God said, "I will cover you with my hand as I pass by" - that's a clear reference to shading.

I'm not sure which parts of my post were conjecture. You might want to be more specific.

Not that it really matters much, I build my theology on a lot of passages so I'm not too terribly worried about one problem passage.
 
Upvote 0

ViaCrucis

Confessional Lutheran
Oct 2, 2011
39,574
29,121
Pacific Northwest
✟814,688.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
Ok I cited the Scripture that says His face shone like the sun.

It also says that His hair was made of wool as white as snow and His eyes like blazing fire, and that a sword protruded from His mouth. This is a vision of Jesus, not a literal description of what Jesus physically looks like. I don't seem to recall the Gospel accounts talking about the resurrected Jesus having fire eyes and a sword in His mouth, because He didn't. The man Jesus Christ who died and rose is the same Jesus who ascended and is seated at the right hand of glory. A flesh-and-bone human being.

-CryptoLutheran
 
Upvote 0

JAL

Veteran
Site Supporter
Oct 16, 2004
10,778
928
Visit site
✟343,550.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
In view of the human tendency toward idolatry, you honestly think that God is foolish enough to show us false images of Himself? Please. I see the Lutheran emblem on your profile. Do you not believe in the Real Presence?That God can assume any physical form?
You should recall that Augustine stated that every visible manifestation of God (every theophany) in both testament was a PHYSICAL PRESENCE. Admittedly he did not go so far as to admit (with me) that God is a physical being – a great mistake, in my view.

Man is made in the image of God – that’s reason enough to surmise a human-like figure, and the Bible abundantly attests to it by documenting such in biblical visions and theophanies. You’re free to draw a different conclusion based on Platonic philosophy but the Bible itself is clear enough.

When the 70 elders went up the mount to see God, it says His feet rested on pavement. Is the Bible trying to deceive us? Is it TRYING to foster within our minds false, idolatrous images for us to worship?Is God really foolish enough to behave that way - and then record it in a book as to mislead all future generations as well?
 
Upvote 0

ViaCrucis

Confessional Lutheran
Oct 2, 2011
39,574
29,121
Pacific Northwest
✟814,688.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others

So then God is literally, physically a bush on fire? Or is He a human-shaped thing? Or is He physically, literally a pillar of smoke/flame? Or is He a great cloud?

Does when God sit down, His feet literally are kicked up and resting upon planet earth?

Indeed theophanies are visible, physical manifestations of God's presence in a localized way. That does not make theophanies the actual, exact, physical definition of the Divine Essence. God clearly has chosen to act and show forth Himself in various ways in the past--that's what a theophany is. It does not mean that God is, actually and literally, in His eternal Essence a flaming bush, a pillar of smoke, or a human-shaped being. It means He appeared this way for very specific purposes. Because He's God and can do that.

-CryptoLutheran
 
Upvote 0

JAL

Veteran
Site Supporter
Oct 16, 2004
10,778
928
Visit site
✟343,550.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Any vision of God is an accurate revelation of Him. It's not a deception.

As for the burning bush, I personally don't think He was the bush itself, more likely the Fire in the bush. But He could have assumed bush-form as well, no reason why not. You're saying He can become bread and wine but not a bush?

John promised a baptism of the Twelve in Fire. The disciples saw (wait for the surprise) Fire descend on their heads on Pentecost. Hm....this Bible is really difficult to follow...
 
Upvote 0

JohnRabbit

just trying to understand
Site Supporter
Feb 12, 2009
4,383
320
i am in alabama
✟100,288.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Ok I cited the Scripture that says His face shone like the sun.

a fact that i think everyone knows on this fourm.

And as for the shading part, it's pretty clear in the passage, God said, "I will cover you with my hand as I pass by" - that's a clear reference to shading.

this is not what you presented in your original soliloquy. what you presented earlier was akin to God dimming His glory like one would dim a lampshade.

I'm not sure which parts of my post were conjecture. You might want to be more specific.

after you state that God's face shines as the sun, you immediately go into conjecture!


Not that it really matters much, I build my theology on a lot of passages so I'm not too terribly worried about one problem passage.

that may be the case, but it does not negate the fact that you spewed conjecture which is edifying to no one.
 
Upvote 0

JAL

Veteran
Site Supporter
Oct 16, 2004
10,778
928
Visit site
✟343,550.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
a fact that i think everyone knows on this fourm.

this is not what you presented in your original soliloquy. what you presented earlier was akin to God dimming His glory like one would dim a lampshade.
Well we do want to explain the passage, right? I suppose there will have to be some conjecture at some points in Scripture due to a lack of clarity.

Anyway my view makes good sense. Imagine God's walking toward you FACING you, and assume His face is too bright (but not His back). Therefore He must shade His face until HE HAS PASSED YOU (until He is no longer facing you) thus allowing you to see His back. "I will cover you with my hand UNTIL I HAVE PASSED BY, And I will take away mine hand, and thou shalt see my back parts: but my face shall not be seen." Once He has passed by, there is no longer any need for the facial covering/shading.

I don't see how you call this conjecture. This passage could hardly make it more clear.

I mean, my view isn't some random conjecture. It's a reasonable, professional interpretation.
 
Upvote 0

JohnRabbit

just trying to understand
Site Supporter
Feb 12, 2009
4,383
320
i am in alabama
✟100,288.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Well we do want to explain the passage, right?

right!


I suppose there will have to be some conjecture at some points in Scripture due to a lack of clarity.



the lack of clarity is cleared up by other verses, you know, here a little there a little... (isa 28:10).

also peter said:


2 Peter 1:20(NKJV)
20knowing this first, that no prophecy of Scripture is of any private interpretation,


Anyway my view makes good sense.

may make sense to you, but is not consistent with the written record!



it's not!

it's simply not what you presented in your soliloquy!



I mean, my view isn't some random conjecture. It's a reasonable, professional interpretation.

it is random, nowhere reasonable, and sorely amateurish!

again i refer you to 2pet 1:20!
 
Upvote 0

JAL

Veteran
Site Supporter
Oct 16, 2004
10,778
928
Visit site
✟343,550.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
(sigh). "Nowhere reasonable"? Ok that sounds like intellectual dishonesty so I likel won't debate this much longer. My conclusion may be incorrect but it's not totally random and unreasonable.

Why do YOU think God covered Moses when passing by? That is, why did He provide the covering only when facing Moses and then withdrew the covering when His back was to Moses? (Personally I'll bet you'll reply with some random conjecture).

Or maybe you're debating whether it was God the Father or God the Son. (That disctinction isn't generally important to me when it comes to visions since either of the two Persons is likely glorious enough to satisfy my need for beauty).
 
Upvote 0

JohnRabbit

just trying to understand
Site Supporter
Feb 12, 2009
4,383
320
i am in alabama
✟100,288.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single


here's conjecture:

"And that, my friends, is astonishing. Moses was so incredibly advanced that he could withstand the fullness of Gods back - a revelation that would have instantly killed any ordinary man."


and this is embellishment on your part, the bible says no such thing!

i'm not trying to give you a hard time, i'm just calling it as i see it!


i'm not debating, i have proved through scripture that it was Jesus who spoke to moses.
 
Upvote 0

JAL

Veteran
Site Supporter
Oct 16, 2004
10,778
928
Visit site
✟343,550.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
So what if it was Jesus or the Father? Does the Son of God have more visible glory, or less, than the Father? Not worth debating in my opinion.

And the part about Moses' maturity isn't total conjecture. You might want to take a look at Numbers 12:6-8 which says that Moses' spiritual maturity is what licensed him to have such face-to-face encounters with God.

If you think you're on a par with Moses - capable of withstanding the same degree of divine revelation as he did - then you either (1) overestimate yourself or (2) underestimate the emotional trauma of a full revelation of the Son's glory.

More likely #2, based on my experience with the church. Most Christians haven't got the faintest clue as to the degree of exhilaration signified in Christ's statement, "I came that they may have life, and have it abundantly."
 
Upvote 0

JohnRabbit

just trying to understand
Site Supporter
Feb 12, 2009
4,383
320
i am in alabama
✟100,288.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single


this thread was started because there are some in this forum that don't believe that it was Jesus Who talked to moses and has nothing to do with more or less glory. however, this fact does have implications on other points of doctrine.



as far as moses' maturity, what you have written about it is conjecture, even though you cite the verses from numbers.


here's proof of your conjecture!

you said:


"Had Moses lived just a little longer, and kept maturing spiritually, perhaps he soon would have been able to withstand God's face."

so taking what you said, one can take scripture and prove you wrong!

Exodus 33:20(NKJV)
20But He said, “You cannot see My face; for no man shall see Me, and live.”

see?

God says that no man can see His face and live!

so your conjecture on moses' maturity would simply contradict the verse!


i'm not trying to down or belittle you. i'm actually trying to be a help!

we simply cannot add, take away from or embellish the scripture as we are admonished not to do so - per 2pet 1:20.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,550
28,531
74
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,300.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian

Perhaps that is why these folks in Revelation 6 are asking the mountains and rocks to hide them from the Face of Yahweh/Jesus?

Reve 6:16
And they are saying to the mountains and to the rocks "be falling on us! and hide us! from Face of the One-sitting upon the Throne
and from the wrath of the Lamb.
[Hosea 10:8/Luke 23:30]

Reve 20:11
Then I saw a great white throne and Him Who sat on it, from Whose Face the land and the heaven fled away.
And place not was found to them.
[Reve 12:8/6:16]

http://www.christianforums.com/t7435912-5/#post54001293
Face of One sitting upon the throne Reve 6/20



.
 
Upvote 0

JohnRabbit

just trying to understand
Site Supporter
Feb 12, 2009
4,383
320
i am in alabama
✟100,288.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single


good point!
 
Upvote 0

YosemiteSam

Newbie
Apr 30, 2010
811
21
in Texas
✟1,012.00
Faith
Marital Status
Single
Your point is????

Point is Cribstyl your post was just defeated. Here we see he has a waist, feet, face...etc... Evidently God does have definition which man can see when allowed...

Gen 2 "Let US make man after OUR image and after OUR likeness"

Get the point?
 
Upvote 0

YosemiteSam

Newbie
Apr 30, 2010
811
21
in Texas
✟1,012.00
Faith
Marital Status
Single


You hear that? NOthing! Excellent scripture driven post!
 
Upvote 0

YosemiteSam

Newbie
Apr 30, 2010
811
21
in Texas
✟1,012.00
Faith
Marital Status
Single

Sir, I am going to challenge you on that.... Ughhhh, okay you're right it was Christ, the Lord of the Sabbath.
 
Upvote 0