Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I think that StormyOne, Tall, and Reddog would make decent mods.
JM
I think if someone feels they would do a good job and wants to do it, that they shouldn't be embarrassed or shy at this point. TELL US!
There might be people qualified/excited about it that we're just not thinking about, and I'd give everyone a fair shot.
I think all of us on here would.
I also nominate "OntheDL"!
Sophia did a good job when she was a mod here. But I don't know if she's willing.
Tall may not be an adventist very soon and he also wanted to quit the forum.
Reddog could be a good choice.
Sorry I'm more of a 'come and go as I wish' type of person. I've always had problems with rules and regulations. So I'm not cut out to keep others in line.
Interesting mj..... though I am a moderator of another forum, I suspect that there are members here who call themselves traditional who would not like to see me become a moderator here. While I cannot say for certain if they like me or not, I do know that they don't care for me, nor do they trust me. Consequently, me being a moderator for them would be like a nightmare. Not because I can't do the job, but because of their feelings about me.....I think that StormyOne, Tall, and Reddog would make decent mods.
JM
I have one question. Those members here who believe they would be good moderators, especially those from the traditional side (or the progressive side) who have called all those who don't believe as they do every name in the book but a child of God, how can they be impartial and fair?
Knowing that a person has expressed that they don't consider some people adventists, yet they will have the power to enforce rules here, how is that a good thing?
ROFL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!I have one question. Those members here who believe they would be good moderators, especially those from the traditional side (or the progressive side) who have called all those who don't believe as they do every name in the book but a child of God, how can they be impartial and fair?
Knowing that a person has expressed that they don't consider some people adventists, yet they will have the power to enforce rules here, how is that a good thing?
My question is funny because?
Ahh--DL--you really would have been a good one. After what you said in the TSDA forum--I think you are more highly qualified than anyone in here--I'm serious.
Won't you please reconsider?
Amen Stormy. That is why I have limited my Traditional nominations to TrustAndObey and Reddogs. They are the only two I feel I can trust to be impartial.
You guys need to give it a break. We are looking for a solutions here not fanning more flames, right?She's relishing with glee the thought of being able to crush us out of forum existence the first chance she got. That would be her first order of business as mod.
I am not fanning any flames, but I am concerned that if all the moderators end up being those who consider themselves "traditional adventists" can we expect them to be impartial given some of the harsh things they have said?You guys need to give it a break. We are looking for a solutions here not fanning more flames, right?
This can be avoided by having separate votes from each camp. This is unfortunate but the rhetoric that continues to spue from the Traditional side bespeaks trouble.I would have serious reservations about how the forum would operate if all the moderators here ended up being from the traditional camp....
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?